Media

TV Station In Crosshairs Of Child Welfare War

STRANGE ALLEGATIONS LEVELED AGAINST WLTX … BUT WHY? || By FITSNEWS ||  Most local television stations in South Carolina are utterly worthless … unless of course you’re looking for regurgitated, left-of-center talking points spoon fed straight from government bureaucracies and powerful corporate interests. Oh, and “stories” based on advertising revenue as opposed to…

STRANGE ALLEGATIONS LEVELED AGAINST WLTX … BUT WHY?

|| By FITSNEWS ||  Most local television stations in South Carolina are utterly worthless … unless of course you’re looking for regurgitated, left-of-center talking points spoon fed straight from government bureaucracies and powerful corporate interests.

Oh, and “stories” based on advertising revenue as opposed to newsworthiness …

We’ve chronicled the worthlessness of the Palmetto State’s legacy media establishment (which is government-subsidized, by the way) again and again and again and again.  It’s a complete joke … which is sad given the obligation they have to watch out for the people of this state.

As it relates specifically to this story, South Carolina’s “MSM” sat on its hands for more than three years while FITS exposed all sorts of scams, frauds and (eventually) life-threatening incompetence perpetrated by the S.C. Department of Social Services (SCDSS).

Eventually one station – WTLX TV 19 (CBS – Columbia, S.C.) – picked up our reporting (albeit without credit).  Their report snowballed into a full-blown feeding frenzy – and less than four months later the director of the agency was forced to resign.

Months later a damning audit was released, once again confirming much of our reporting on this troubled agency.

Has any of this fixed SCDSS?  Hell no … although lawmakers led by S.C. Senator Katrina Shealy are doing their best to turn things around.

Earlier this week, WLTX – which has continued to follow the agency – posted a story about a child welfare case involving a 22-year-old who was sentenced to nineteen years in prison for sexually abusing a minor under the age of 11 years old.

MARY STURGILL
MARY STURGILL

The story was written by reporter Mary Sturgill, who arrived at WLTX last December from a TV station in Idaho (where she won awards for her reporting on sex offenders).

Of interest?

According to Sturgill, “the Department of Social Services was notified twice about the abuse” the girl suffered – but that the situation “was never reported to police until the girl gathered evidence and took it to school.”

Not only that, SCDSS appears to have placed the girl back into an environment where abuse was occurring.

Why should you care about this?  Well, for one thing it’s yet another example of this agency’s ongoing incompetence.

But there may be something bigger at work …

Not long after this story aired, FITS received a tip pointedly impugning Sturgill’s journalistic integrity.  Specifically, we were told she deliberately misrepresented herself to court officials (and others) as a state-appointed guardian ad litem in an effort to obtain confidential information about the case.

WLTX declined to comment on this allegation, but a respected media lawyer who is familiar with the case told FITS the charge against Sturgill was a “total fabrication.”

“If she was lying about who she was why did she leave her business card at the clerk’s office?” he said.

Not only that the lawyer – Columbia, S.C.’s Jay Bender – provided us a copy of an email he sent to S.C. family court judge Monét S. Pincus this week.  That email – related to the case in question – would appear to indicate other strange things are afoot.

“A person appeared at WLTX purporting to be a process server and delivered a document styled ‘Order for Emergency Hearing,'” Bender wrote the judge.  “The document indicated that DSS and a guardian ad litem … would move to make WLTX a party to the litigation in order to seek the imposition of a prior restraint.”

What sort of prior restraint?  And to what end?

At first glance, SCDSS apparently doesn’t want the name of the minor child released … but WLTX has not released the child’s name (and according to our sources at the station, has no plans to release).

So what gives?  Why would such a seismic allegation be leveled at a reporter?  Accompanied by such a seemingly unnecessary threat?

Hmmmm …

Is SCDSS exacting revenge against the station for its prior coverage?  Or is it hoping to muzzle the station moving forward?

Either way, Bender adamantly opposed the agency’s effort.

“If the public is to be in a position to fully evaluate the performance of DSS and other agencies charged with the protection of our children, the public must have access to records and proceedings by which DSS actions are considered,” Bender concluded.  “Secrecy should not be the norm.”

We agree …

Anyway, we’ll be sure to let our readers know what else we’re able to uncover about this bizarre case.

***

Related posts

Media

Ronna, We Hardly Knew Ye

FITSNews
Media

‘Promise Man’ Threatens Life Of South Carolina Journalist

Andrew Fancher
Media

Welcoming Andy Fancher

FITSNews

12 comments

She Sucks March 20, 2015 at 2:15 pm

Pincus is a horrible family court judge!

Reply
What Goes Around, Comes Around March 20, 2015 at 7:07 pm

Another Segars-Andrews, eh?

Reply
idiotwind March 20, 2015 at 2:27 pm

who on earth watches local tv news? difficult to imagine what the audience must be like, but i’m gonna guess they aren’t looking for hard hitting truthiness.

Reply
jimlewisowb March 20, 2015 at 2:28 pm

I may be wrong but didn’t Gov. Muffinburger just anoint a Super Cockroach to run DSS like a Lean Green Mean Fightin Machine

If the new DSS Director is in the Dark about this effort, then it confirms she is just another Bobble Head Cockroach Appointee

If the new Director is 100% in charge of this effort well then, don’t we have yet another Queen Bitch ah-knockin at the door

Either way it looks like Senators Shealy and Lourie got punked

Reply
Squishy123 March 20, 2015 at 4:01 pm

You mean Dawnde, Papa Joe and the human salamander at WIS didn’t take time out of talking up the latest festival in Columbia to report this news? Maybe they could have Joe Gorcho report it in all the funny voices he does.

Reply
This is hoooome March 20, 2015 at 5:00 pm

WLTX sucks horribly, especially with their stupid-assed song played on Fridays. It irks me to no end.

Reply
euwe max March 20, 2015 at 6:16 pm

In a libertarian universe, we’d just sell the kids to the highest bidder at auction – and *no one* would have evidence of abuse, because privacy and self-determination trumps little kids.

Reply
FastEddy23 March 20, 2015 at 8:30 pm

… That’s what they do in Dubai… The “white slave” trade is centered in the Muslim countries of East Africa.

(That’s what that Dubai Port Deal was really about a few years back. Filling those empties with young boys and girls bound for the slave markets of the Persian Gulf. … No kidding.)

Reply
DSS Is Notoriously Fucked Up March 20, 2015 at 7:02 pm

There are plenty of cases on the books, and there are plenty of parents who have victimized by DSS, that entities and lawyers at DSS better shut the fuck up and knock off their pathological lying or they will end up stripped up everything they own.

Reply
FastEddy23 March 20, 2015 at 8:28 pm

FITs! You da man! Keep up the good work! Hit ’em again, harder, harder …

Reply
Bubbaknows March 21, 2015 at 12:03 am

Get your facts straight before you pull your hair trigger. The action against WLTX wasn’t initiated by DSS.

Reply
Manray9 March 21, 2015 at 10:46 am

“(L)eft-of-center talking points?” C’mon, Sic. Either you don’t have a clue about what constitutes “left of center” or you’re simply disingenuous. There SHOULD be some left of center points made by the media in SC. The problem: there is virtually no political or public interest reporting on SC television — left, right or center. That’s a major reason behind the perpetuation of the crony capitalist “business as usual” environment here. If there were some real reporting on the shenanigans in Columbia, things may finally change, but instead — all the sheep say “baaa.”

Reply

Leave a Comment