|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Return of the ‘Week in Review’
Relaunching, reimagining… and expanding.

Relaunching, reimagining… and expanding.
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Sign up for our free newsletter and get 2 free articles.
You're in! Loading your article…
You've reached your free article limit. Subscribe for unlimited access.
6 comments
FITS, please tell us again how this blog started.
Sincerely!
You may have young potential viewers/subscribers who do not know your origin story; and it may excite them.
Also, share the pain Mandy Matney and Dylan Nolan caused you. We’re your friends around here. Cry on our shoulders if that helps; only don’t let the babies see you do it.
Won’t be the same without Dylan
Actually, good riddance to Dylan. His hypocrisy was so naked it was not even funny; and he was woefully ignorant of political history before his time. I hope Andy Fancher did not catch the figurative bug; or if he did, he does some heavy-duty sneezing it out in open air and in literal sunshine.
He was an arrogant back stabber
Just related to ALL THREE SUBJECTS of (1) the return of your videos, (2) the still-unreleased Murdaugh opinion(s), and (3) the pain your former employees, I paste here my comment on Mandy Matney’s upcoming contempt hearing:
BTW, Malicious Mandy Matney (“MMM”) also reportedly claimed on her website that she has inside information that Alex Murdaugh’s two murder convictions were going to be reversed last week.
A deposition-taker who has public confidence in the judiciary best interest at heart should ask MMM about that. After all, the standard for a deposition is “reasonably calculated to lead to discoverable evidence.”
The issue of MMM Mafia-like network of soft prostitution and covert bribes to get information or to smuggle it to jurors is relevant to all cases related to the Murdaughs directly or derivatively, all in my opinion free from false humility but always with a reminder that I am NOT a lawyer but have been complimented ON THE TRANSCRIBED RECORD by at least one federal judge as better that lawyers who appear in that jurist’s court.
What time is your show today?