State-level politicians like South Carolina governor Henry McMaster aren’t the only ones swimming in political contributions from SCANA – the publicly traded utility at the heart of a mushrooming scandal in the Palmetto State.
Federal politicians are getting mad stacks of cash, too.
According to OpenSecrets.org, SCANA contributions have comprised $43,250 of Rice’s haul during the current cycle – making the embattled company his largest source of campaign cash. All told, interests affiliated with the electric utility industry gave Rice $62,100 over the same period.
That’s his top special interest category.
As this website exclusively reported (here and here), federal agents are officially in on South Carolina’s increasingly radioactive #NukeGate scandal – probing whether state regulators, bureaucrats and politicians may have benefited improperly from SCANA stock increases tied to legislation and regulatory actions.
Those decisions revolve around the abandoned V.C. Summer nuclear power plant project in Jenkinsville, S.C. – a project SCANA partnered on with state-owned power company Santee Cooper.
SCANA and Santee Cooper spent the past decade collaborating on a pair of next-generation nuclear reactors – which were supposed to have been operational last year at a cost of $9.8 billion. The money was spent, but the reactors weren’t finished. Or even half-finished. Not only that, estimates indicate they could cost another $9-16 billion to complete.
Unable to pony up its share of that amount, on July 31 Santee Cooper pulled the plug on the deal … killing an estimated 5,600 jobs, squandering billions of dollars in investment (including more than $2 billion raised through rate increases on consumers), throwing the state’s energy future into chaos, costing the government utility its credit rating and prompting a class action lawsuit against SCANA.
Documents released earlier this month revealed the utilities knew over a year-and-a-half ago the project was doomed – yet continued to raise rates on consumers anyway. There’s also a looming S.C. attorney general’s opinion on the now-notorious “Base Load Review Act,” which lawmakers rammed through the legislature a decade ago as a means of socializing the investment risk associated with the project.
State lawmakers are currently scrambling for political cover … but their hearings have only further exposed their starring role in this debacle.
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? Please feel free to submit your own guest column or letter to the editor via-email HERE. Got a tip for us? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question? CLICK HERE. Want to support what we’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE.
Banner via Text