“I’d like to know more about that,” one constituent asked West, referring to the oath. “I’m not sure I’m okay with people having to sign a pledge.”
“I don’t think that should be done behind closed doors,” the female constituent continued. “I think voters have the right to know what the leadership is asking our representatives to sign.”
“I agree,” another female constituent added.
As do I …
(Click to view)
(Via: FITSNews/ YouTube)
West largely whiffed in his responses to these questions …
“I can’t discuss what is actually going on within the caucus but I can tell you that everything is gonna be put out this week for public view – I’m assuming even the caucus rules are going to be put out there,” West said.
Actually, those rules are already out there. This news outlet published them (.pdf) yesterday when we aired an excerpt from an interview with newly elected state representative Joe White of Newberry County.
The rule driving this debate holds that no lawmaker “shall engage in campaign activities of any kind against any other caucus member in good standing.”
“It’s an incumbent protection racket, in other words,” I noted in a recent report.
Beyond this, several House members have accused “Republican” majority leader Davey Hiott and S.C. speaker pro tempore Tommy Pope of “weaponizing” the rule by adopting an excessively broad interpretation of the term “campaign activities.”
Among the purportedly verboten “campaign activities?” Posting images of the House’s electronic voting board on members’ social media pages – and a prohibition from discussing the “internal processes” behind House votes during public appearances.
West fired back at those characterizations …
(Click to view)
“There are some things that have been said that really aren’t true – one of those would be that you can’t take a picture of the (voting) board and put it up on Facebook,” West said. “Anybody in that room – in the chamber, in the balcony, anywhere else – that’s public information.”
“I think the concern has been … that there is a lot of misinformation and disinformation out there and the truth is I think there’s a lot of people who are trying to represent their constituencies and do the right things,” West said.
Wait … what?
Posting images of the House voting board is akin to “misinformation and disinformation?”
Last time I checked, West had it right the first time when he referred to this as “public information.”
“So there wasn’t – you weren’t asked to sign an oath?” one constituent pointedly asked the veteran legislator.
“You had to sign that you received the rules and read the rules,” West responded.
Challenged on this point, a constituent told West she had “heard personally that if you did not sign that oath you are not allowed in the meetings.”
“Right, that is the way it is right now,” West confirmed. “That is correct.”
House leaders were reportedly negotiating with the 20 lawmakers who have refused to sign this oath into the morning hours on Wednesday, but as of this writing there is no resolution to the standoff.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR …
Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and seven children.
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
SIGN UP …