Connect with us

Biz

Duke Energy Drops The Hammer On Impoverished Pee Dee Region Of South Carolina

Another massive rate hike is coming to the Palmetto State …

Published

on

A month after putting the hammer to ratepayers in the more prosperous Upstate region of South Carolina, one of the nation’s most unscrupulous power providers is sticking it to residents of the impoverished Pee Dee area of the Palmetto State.

Charlotte, North Carolina-based Duke Energy – fresh off of a massive proposed rate hike for customers of its Carolinas subsidiary – is now proposing to jack rates over multiple years for customers of its Progress subsidiary, which serves an estimated 172,000 people in one of the poorest areas of the state.

Duke actually announced its latest rate hike proposal late last week – no doubt hoping the news would be buried over the Labor Day holiday.

“We know how important electric service is for our customers and no one wants to see bills increase,” Duke’s South Carolina state president Mike Callahan said in a statement announcing the proposed increases. “This is particularly true now as rising costs across most sectors of our economy impact consumers and businesses throughout South Carolina and the nation.”

Yet that is precisely what Duke is doing …

Duke’s multi-year rate hike would begin taking effect on April 1, 2023 – with another increase scheduled for April 1, 2024. All told, it would raise the total monthly bill for a typical residential customer from $133.01 to $151.77. That’s being billed as a 14.1 percent rate hike, but it is actually much worse than that when you consider this company just raised rates by 8.3 precent.

Prior to the rate hike which went into effect on July 1, 2022, Duke’s customers in the Pee Dee were paying $122.86 per month – which would make the April 1, 2024 target a whopping 23.5 percent rate increase.

Commercial and industrial customers would also see huge increases over the coming year-and-a-half.

As for the 640,000 customers of Duke Energy Carolinas, the company announced its intention last month to apply for a massive 13.2 percent rate increase on residential customers, an 18.3 percent rate increase on commercial customers and an even larger 24.4 percent rate hike on industrial customers.

For those of you keeping score at home, the typical ratepayer would see their monthly bill rise on average from $119.32 to $135.07. A hearing on that increase is scheduled for next week in Columbia, S.C.

In addition to this increase, Duke Energy Carolinas is expected to file for a general rate hike in the first quarter of 2023.

All this just in time for the recession, right?

*****

DON’T MISS A STORY …

*****

Duke’s proposed rate hikes must be approved by the S.C. Public Service Commission (SCPSC), a panel of political appointees which until recently served as a rubber stamp for utilities. Regular members of our audience will recall this commission curtailed Duke’s effort to raise rates (and fees) on consumers three years ago – a move which prompted chief executive officer Lynn Good to threaten pulling investments from the Palmetto State.

Duke’s 2019 rate hike – and the general opprobriousness of its executives – stood in stark contrast to the approach of Virginia-based Dominion Energy, which actually declined to implement a rate increase that it had previously planned for 2020 due to the economic impact of the Covid-19 crisis on consumers.

Clearly, Duke has no such similar concern for its consumers …

What is driving these rate hikes? Poor resource planning … well, that and Duke’s failed attempt to pass the costs of its braindead decision-making onto Palmetto State ratepayers via a ridiculous “taxation without representation” scheme.


North Carolina lawmakers were dumb enough to fall for this scam, and it looked as though South Carolina was poised to follow suit. Fortunately, S.C. attorney general Alan Wilson stepped in – issuing a sharply worded opinion from solicitor general Robert D. Cook declaring the attempted fleecing to be unconstitutional.

Again, though, the real story here is Duke’s continued failure to responsibly manage its energy mix – including its continuing over-reliance on dirty coal as well as its uneconomical attempt to “bridge” to renewables via a buildout of natural gas infrastructure.

“Duke has made terrible decisions regarding its energy mix – decisions which are already costing ratepayers billions of dollars,” I noted in a post back in May. “The company must not be allowed to pass the cost of those bad decisions onto ratepayers – especially if these ratepayers are to be allowed no say in the matter.”

Unfortunately, it looks like Upstate and Pee Dee residents are about to pay a hefty price for Duke’s failure …

*****

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

(Via: FITSNews)

Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and seven children. And yes, he has LOTS of hats (including that Boston Red Sox lid pictured above).

*****

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.

*****

SIGN UP TODAY …

*****

Advertisement
Comments