State House

South Carolina Senator: No Judicial Elections Without Reform

Wes Climer throws down a gauntlet …

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A South Carolina state senator has vowed to block further legislative elections of judges until his colleagues pass a judicial reform bill changing how candidates for the bench are chosen.

S.C. senator Wes Climer of Rock Hill confirmed reports on Monday afternoon (October 2, 2023) that he is planning to filibuster legislation scheduling judicial elections during the 2024 legislative session – at least until lawmakers approve changes to a cliquish panel of powerful lawyer-legislators dubbed the S.C. Judicial Merit Selection Commission (SCJMSC).

“Absolutely,” Climer told me. “We can’t have judicial elections again without reform.”

Climer indicated he had spoken with several senators eager to back his play.

For those of you unfamiliar with this entity, the SCJMSC is a 10-member panel controlled by powerful lawyer-legislators. The panel screens judges prior to submitting their names for legislative election – a process rife with corruption and insider deal-making.

South Carolina is one of only two states in America in which the legislature picks judges. As we have seen in far too many cases, lawyer-legislators reap the rewards of their influence over this process by receiving preferential treatment on behalf of their clients. As this news outlet has consistently noted, the current system has enabled institutional corruption, shredded the rights of victims, empowered violent criminals and materially eroded public safety.

It has also turned the judiciary into little more than a political annex of the legislature.

Support FITSNews … SUBSCRIBE!

***

S.C. attorney general Alan Wilson has been leading a push to reconfigure the SCJMSC. Freshmen lawmakers Joe White of Newberry and Heather Bauer of Columbia have also been building support for the issue within the S.C. House of Representatives. In the State Senate, Dick Harpootlian – who has been battling with Wilson in the ‘Murdaugh Murders’ saga – has emerged as a new ally in the fight after he witnessed the corruption of the process unfold in his backyard.

“It has become increasingly clear to me that we need to pass legislation to reform the current process of selecting judges in the state of South Carolina,” Harpootlian wrote in a letter two months ago to Senate judiciary chairman Luke Rankin. “Currently, there are five bills pending in the Senate judiciary committee concerning the Judicial Merit Selection Commission. I believe we need a subcommittee to review these bills and refer proposed legislation to the full committee.”

The general consensus? That this commission – and the current rules which govern its deliberations, processes and decisions – must be dramatically reconfigured. Or rather reconstructed. At a bare minimum.

My view? Bigger change is needed … but certainly I don’t want to stop lawmakers from taking these initial actions.

While Climer is intent on holding up all judicial nominations until they do, he did say there would be one exception to his filibuster – the ascension of supreme court justice John W. Kittredge to the top spot on the high court. Kittredge is in line to follow outgoing chief justice Donald Beatty, whose six-and-a-half year tenure at the head of the South Carolina judicial branch has been an unmitigated disaster.

Will Climer’s gambit work?

Filibusters on hot-button issues – especially during election years – can be effective. For example, state senator Tom Davis used a filibuster to block a gas tax hike during the 2016 legislative session. Unfortunately, “Republican” lawmakers sat Davis down the following year – mustering just enough votes to end his filibuster.

It takes a hard twenty-four votes to shut down a filibuster on a bill’s second reading though the chamber. On its third reading, three-fifths of all senators present and voting must vote to sit a senator down (i.e. end the filibuster). There are forty-six seats in the chamber, although two are currently vacant. Both of those seats will be filled by the time lawmaker return to Columbia, S.C. for the 2024 legislative session.

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

Will Folks (Dylan Nolan)

Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and seven (soon to be eight) children.

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to proactively address? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.

***

Get our newsletter by clicking here …

*****

Related posts

State House

Supreme Court Drops The Hammer On Marvin Pendarvis

Will Folks
State House

Yes, Welfare Agencies Are Sending Voter Registration Forms To Illegal Aliens

Dylan Nolan
State House

Judicial Reform’s Last Gasp In South Carolina

Will Folks

7 comments

Avatar photo
The Colonel Top fan October 2, 2023 at 9:57 pm

Finally, some courage and leadership on a much needed reform!

Reply
Nanker Phelge October 2, 2023 at 10:58 pm

SC’s very own Tubby Tuberville. Yeehaw.

Reply
Anonymous October 3, 2023 at 7:10 am

Problem is the house elects judges not the senate so it’s all just political posturing

Reply
J Doe October 3, 2023 at 10:35 pm

It’s both House and Senate voting combined in joint session.

Reply
J Doe October 3, 2023 at 7:11 am

Stupid idea. There is a huge number of judicial vacancies currently and many other judges on the verge of retirement. We need to fill those seats so justice does not continue to be delayed for people.

Reply
Vulpes' Chicken Coop Management October 3, 2023 at 8:08 am

Reform is great, until you realize these jokers are the ones that will be doing the reforming.

Reply
G Top fan October 3, 2023 at 1:26 pm

Don’t allow lawyer/legislators to practice law in State Courts. They will say that isn’t fair because they need to make a living, however, no one is forcing them to run for office. Either be a lawyer or a legislator or practice solely in federal court.

Reply

Leave a Comment