Letter: Lancaster SC Bridge Fixed After FITS Report
WHISTLEBLOWERS KEPT PEOPLE FROM “GETTING HURT OR KILLED” Dear Editor, It must be a hard You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
WHISTLEBLOWERS KEPT PEOPLE FROM “GETTING HURT OR KILLED” Dear Editor, It must be a hard You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
9 comments
Sic Willie, don’t hurt your arm patting yourself on the back. BTW, I have searched and searched on your site looking for your structural and/or geotechnical calculations and assessments that ascertained that the bridge not safe. Are they no longer on your site?
Without the calculations, he’s got a 75-95% chance of being right that the bridge is not safe. Play the odds.
All much ado about nothing. Whistleblower full of hot air just like Fits!
Will needs to quit posting letters he writes to himself. The GrandTango stuff is bad enough.
Now if only Lancaster would fix the Susan DeVenny problem….
…. That’s the way it worked in Ben Franklin’s day … And it should work like that everywhere.
“Keep ’em flying!”
(This pugnacious, psydonominous, prickly poster knows the power of the whistleblower … having been run off of several politically corrected, propagandized, pundit and poor policy driven, pseudo-populist papers’ posting points … here in the states and abroad, I’m proud to say.)
http://uglybridges.com/1485705 No inspection reports since 2012…..Hmmmmm
http://uglybridges.com/1485712 Gives you all the info you need to know!
If you knew anything about bridge data you would know that data from the FHWA that all states submit is always 1 to 2 years behind what is actually current. This is where your data originated from. Quit throwing fuel on a non-fire. The bridge was ok before and is now. You peeps and so called whistleblowers are self serving attention seeking juveniles.