Love how this “reform movement with some teeth” is named after something that accomplished nothing except making the government function even worse, and causing incalculable suffering and death.
More important than whether the regulations are authorized by statutes is whether the statutes themselves are scientific.
Statutes are not an end in themselves; but means to an end.
Just because a statute is enacted by a duly-elected body does not mean that it will achieve what it is meant to achieve, even if applied the way the legislature intended.
Is there a constitutional basis for expecting statutes to be scientific? Yes; but it is more explained in the Declaration of Independence: the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Simplifying it, a parent whose child lives is inarguably happier than a parent whose child dies in a car accident.
The question then becomes: do speed limits reduce car accidents?
If they do, then the statute setting speed limits is constitutional and fulfilling the government’s end of its social contract with the governed.
If they do not, then the statute is unconstitutional as controlling people’s lives without achieving the happiness the government exists to facilitate.
What tells us if speed limits do or do not reduce car accidents? Science. Science of dynamics of moving objects. Statistical sciences, etc.
Good night and God bless.
ANY new way of looking at government at every level should and must be given a shot. Because the “same ole same ole” way of governing has no record of success other than keeping many corrupticrats (whether elected or hired) in power.
Bill Sandifer's Panamanian Hooker Top fanJanuary 11, 2026 at 9:37 pm
I predict state or federal indictments (or both!) for Rom by the end of the year. I am paying 6:1 for CSAM, 4:1 for drugs/prostitutes, 3:1 for tax evasion and 2:1 for environmental liability. Fools names and fools faces are often seen in public places.
8 comments
Love how this “reform movement with some teeth” is named after something that accomplished nothing except making the government function even worse, and causing incalculable suffering and death.
Im OK supporting Rom, because whatever else choice is there. But his association (paying) you makes me rethink even that
How much did this handjob cost Rum?
More important than whether the regulations are authorized by statutes is whether the statutes themselves are scientific.
Statutes are not an end in themselves; but means to an end.
Just because a statute is enacted by a duly-elected body does not mean that it will achieve what it is meant to achieve, even if applied the way the legislature intended.
Is there a constitutional basis for expecting statutes to be scientific? Yes; but it is more explained in the Declaration of Independence: the right to the pursuit of happiness.
Simplifying it, a parent whose child lives is inarguably happier than a parent whose child dies in a car accident.
The question then becomes: do speed limits reduce car accidents?
If they do, then the statute setting speed limits is constitutional and fulfilling the government’s end of its social contract with the governed.
If they do not, then the statute is unconstitutional as controlling people’s lives without achieving the happiness the government exists to facilitate.
What tells us if speed limits do or do not reduce car accidents? Science. Science of dynamics of moving objects. Statistical sciences, etc.
Good night and God bless.
ANY new way of looking at government at every level should and must be given a shot. Because the “same ole same ole” way of governing has no record of success other than keeping many corrupticrats (whether elected or hired) in power.
Federal DOGE is already dust in the wind and actually cost America more money. Expect SC DOGE to do the same.
I predict state or federal indictments (or both!) for Rom by the end of the year. I am paying 6:1 for CSAM, 4:1 for drugs/prostitutes, 3:1 for tax evasion and 2:1 for environmental liability. Fools names and fools faces are often seen in public places.
F*ckin’ awesome issues here. I’m very glad to see your article. Thank you a lot and i’m looking ahead to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?