|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
by WILL FOLKS
***
The upcoming year will go a long way in determining whether South Carolina becomes safer, freer and more prosperous – or whether the Palmetto State’s powerful trial lawyer lobby cements its stranglehold over the corrupt uni-party establishment that runs the “GOP-controlled” S.C. General Assembly.
You know, the same legislative establishment that keeps running South Carolina into the ground on virtually every metric that matters…
In 2025, left-of-center trial lawyers won big before the legislature – defeating a comprehensive tort reform bill, staving off meaningful changes to the state’s corrupt judicial selection process (again), preserving a secretive docket that enriches the most powerful politician in the state and positioning one of their own (a former legislative leader) to become the next associate justice of the supreme court.
How did they achieve so many decisive victories? Easy… they purchased them. And they’re continuing to dole out quid pro quos heading into the next legislative session, which kicks off on January 13, 2026 at the state capital in Columbia, S.C.
***
As lawmakers – and the lawyer-legislators who control their votes – prepare to return to the people’s house, the disconnect between what citizens expect of them and what they intend to do on behalf of their special interest puppeteers could not be more pronounced. At a time when citizens are clamoring for sweeping changes to a system that enables institutional graft, erodes competitiveness, accommodates violent criminals, re-victimizes victims and defies constitutional separation of powers – the trial lawyer lobby is digging in its heels to protect the status quo.
And make no mistake: trial lawyers’ efforts have nothing to do with “justice” and everything to do with safeguarding badly broken systems – and the ill-gotten gains they continue to derive from preserving those systems.
The war ahead – which coincides with partisan primary elections for statewide offices and all 124 seats in the S.C. House of Representatives – will be waged on three critical fronts over the coming months.
Here are those unfolding battle lines…
***
JUDICIAL REFORM
***
Two major proposals are currently being considered which would take direct aim at the corrupt judicial establishment in South Carolina. First is the comprehensive judicial selection reform legislation being championed by the pro-citizen DOGE SC movement.
While not as aggressive as constitutional changes advanced for years by FITSNews, DOGE SC’s proposal is easily the most substantive judicial reform bill ever introduced in the S.C. General Assembly. Its passage would not only mark a major step forward in restoring public faith in our courts – it would embolden a constitutionally anemic executive branch and enhance judicial independence.
The DOGE SC bill would fundamentally overhaul the scandal-ravaged S.C. Judicial Merit Selection Commission (JMSC) – the legislatively controlled, 12-member panel which screens judicial candidates and determines which ones advance to a vote by the whole General Assembly.
Last week, DOGE SC leader Rom Reddy touted the “unprecedented momentum behind restoring constitutional balance and judicial integrity” – citing growing legislative support for the bill being pushed by his movement.
***
Judicial Reform Bills Pre-Filed in Both Chambers as Momentum Becomes Impossible to Ignore
— DOGE SC (@officialdogesc) December 23, 2025
Columbia, SC — Judicial reform in South Carolina has reached a decisive moment.
Comprehensive reform of the Judicial Merit Selection Commission has now been pre-filed in both the South…
***
“When nearly sixty House members and a growing group of Senators step forward, it means the people of South Carolina are demanding change,” Reddy said. “The Senate cannot pretend this issue does not exist. Silence is no longer an option.”
DOGE SC is also advancing an equal parenting act which targets another cash cow for South Carolina’s litigious special interests – Palmetto State’s badly broken family court system.
Billed as “a landmark reform” aimed at “ensuring children maintain meaningful relationships with both parents after separation or divorce,” DOGE SC’s proposed family court legislation would establish a rebuttable presumption that equal parenting time is in the best interests of the child “when both parents are fit and willing.”
This legislation has drawn criticism, but it would go along way toward disrupting what amounts to another state-sanctioned racket for the trial lawyer lobby…
***
TORT REFORM
***
Last year’s debate over tort reform highlighted the ubiquitous power of the Palmetto State’s trial lawyer lobby – but it also exposed just how desperate this entrenched special interest is to maintain its vice grip over “justice” in the Palmetto State.
South Carolina’s tort climate has been the subject of significant debate ever since a high-profile case tied to the ‘Murdaugh Murders’ crime and corruption saga exposed the fundamental unfairness of the Palmetto State’s current law. Ironically, that case also exposed the corruption of the plaintiffs’ lawyer lobby – which was briefly led by convicted killer Alex Murdaugh.
Despite such nefarious associations, trial lawyers were successful in killing S. 244 – a comprehensive lawsuit reform bill introduced by S.C. Senate majority leader Shane Massey. While Massey was confident he had the votes to pass this bill, so-called “Republicans” Tom Fernandez, Jason Elliott, Billy Garrett, Mike Gambrell, Stephen Goldfinch, Carlisle Kennedy, Josh Kimbrell, Matt Leber, Luke Rankin and Everett Stubbs sold him out – and consistently voted with Democrats on key tallies.
***
Once again, “the quiet part out loud.” South Carolina’s trial lawyer lobby effectively bribing state lawmakers… did it work? Stay tuned for an updated report… #SCStatehouse pic.twitter.com/MBzYSTtPFr
— FITSNews (@fitsnews) September 2, 2025
***
Fernandez, Elliott, Garrett, Goldfinch, Kennedy, Rankin and Stubbs are all trial lawyers, incidentally. Unfortunately, none of these “sellout senators” are on the ballot again until 2028 – but Goldfinch is a statewide candidate for attorney general during the current election cycle.
The cost of their betrayal is immense…
Recent studies have shown South Carolina’s notoriously litigious tort climate imposes a weighty “tort tax” – or “lawsuit tax” – on Palmetto families which ranges anywhere from $3,200 to $3,600 annually, per family.
Lawmakers will have multiple opportunities again in 2026 to address this undue burden, whether by restoring S. 244 – which is currently before the S.C. House judiciary committee – or by taking up its companion, H. 3497. They could also look to H. 4544, a medical malpractice bill currently awaiting a hearing before the same committee.
Any one of these three pieces of legislation could serve as the vehicle for the sort of lawsuit reform legislators failed to pass in 2025… assuming rank-and-file “Republicans” summon the courage to stand for the citizens instead of their lawyer-legislator overlords (and the powerful lobby pulling their strings).
***
THE SUPREME COURT
***
In years past, “Republican” lawmakers have installed far left Democrats to key positions within the judiciary – including former S.C. chief justices Jean Toal and Donald Beatty. Both Toal and Beatty were Democrat lawmakers prior to becoming judges, and both predictably ran the judicial branch in a manner befitting those ideological moorings – materially eroding competitiveness, liberty and public safety in the process.
All of which was subservient to the will of lawyer-legislators, of course…
Now, one of the “Republicans” who elected these liberal judges – former House speaker Jay Lucas – is set to follow them onto the bench. Lucas, of course, is one of the GOP legislative leaders who has also steered South Carolina’s ship of state to the left – presiding over the “most liberal GOP legislature” in the entire nation during his tenure as House speaker.
Have things improved since he departed? No… not at all.
Yet not only is Lucas the runaway favorite to win election to the supreme court in two months time, he is publicly defying the mandatory retirement age for judges as he campaigns for this seat – insisting he will stay on the supreme court for as long as he chooses.
Are “Republicans” really going to install a crony of theirs who has such little respect for the rule of law?
Lawmakers are enabling this overt coup because they are upset at associate supreme court justice John Few. Three years ago, Few forced them to rewrite a controversial abortion statute – and it was his insistence on sending them back to the drawing board which resulted in the passage of a constitutional law.
Rather than thank Few, however, they want to take him out…
This is an opportunity to settle scores, in other words – not to mention a chance to replace an independent jurist with one who will do lawyer-legislators’ bidding. More ominously, Lucas’ election would send an unambiguous message to any judicial candidate who dares defy the legislature on any issue: dissent will not be tolerated.
***
FOLLOW THE VOTES
In the upcoming 2026 legislative session, every single member of the S.C. House of Representatives and State Senate – and every candidate running for statewide office – will have the opportunity to address these key issues.
Starting this month, it will be critical to watch the bills they sponsor, track their votes, keep an eye on their campaign finance contributions and follow their public statements… and decide for yourself whether they are part of the problem or part of the solution.
If they are part of the problem, it’s time to replace them with lawmakers who will be part of the solution… lawmakers who will stand for the citizens and against the entrenched cabal.
Make no mistake, we will be tracking each one of these unfolding fronts closer than ever in 2026 – continuing our ongoing crusade to fix a broken system and hold those who profit from its dysfunction and corruption accountable.
***
ABOUT THE AUTHOR…
Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and eight children.
***
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
11 comments
Will, all politics are local.
And historically, worldwide, the man the king feared most was his brother. Most wars, specially in medieval times were fratricidal or quasi-fratricidal wars of succession.
Your idea of justice is judges who ignore the Eighth Amendment.
And your solution to any problem is to throw prisons and/or deportations at it, you even added a gruesome idea of public executions with tickets sold. Really, you did, and recently, too, until I responded politely and scientifically showing your idea never worked elsewhere and could even increase murders locally.
When you devalue others’ human lives, you come to devalue your own, and worse, your and grand-children devalue their own lives and engage in self-destructive behavior and even commit suicides.
Salafis (Islamic extremists) totally devalue Jewish lives; that is why it is very easy for them to recruit suicide bombers, And against those, traditional punitive solutions withint the legal system are TOTALLY powerless. TOTALLY. I mean totally. How do you deter a man who thinks he can go to paradise by killing Jews and/or Christians SPECIALLY if he dies in the process? You can’t.
How do you deter a woman who hates her husband so much she kills her own children to get back at him? You won’t.
The two real solutions are love and science. And you cannot legislate the first; but you can legislate the second.
You are clearly paid, and DOGE SC is clearly deluded, to promote the idea that having a magical governor find and appoint magical judges will solve all problems.
The reality is there are no magical governors and no magical judges.
The scientific realities are that rational individuals will do what is in their self-interest every time. The trick is to scientifically construct a system that makes self-interest also coincide with public interest.
The Declaration of Independence speaks of the pursuit of HAPPINESS, not the pursuit of money.
I will not debate whether money buys happiness or does not because, even if you believe that money (and money alone) can buy happiness, you tacitly admit that money is not a goal in itself but a means to an end: happiness.
So, the trick to solving the problem of money corrupting the judicial process is to eliminate the (figurative) middle man. That is construct a system that makes people happy without needing money (beyond basic needs) to reach that level of happiness.
That is surely easier said than done. But doing it is made much harder, even impossible, with your rabid rhetoric for replacing a faulty system with a system of no promise to improve anything.
Your hateful rhetoric also kills the other solution: love.
You and your clan even exploited the reasonable and wounded Mr. Ferderico (to whom my condolences go) for your paid-for ends. He began by the very sensible request for a law criminalizing gun owners who leave a loaded weapon unlocked. That is how Ms. Ferderico was killed: with the unlocked loaded gun of her host who had left it visible in his apartment for a criminal on a rampage to find. You and David Pascoe and the so-called judicial reform movement are not supporting that most sensible idea of Mr. Ferderico’s, or even letting him repeat it, all because you fear the gun lobby.
If you let this comment of mine through, I shall, God willing, follow with further ideas for a prevention-not-punishment oriented legal system.
If you don’t let it through, you can always go coercive-control yourself.
Senator S Goldfinch was indicted and plead guilty to selling aborted fetuses across state line.
He is loved by the pro-abortion/trial lawyers coalition.
To be fair lawyer/senator Massey represent insurance companies in insurance lawsuits, just how well do you think his insurance reform “bill” would work for SC citizens?
When Will was throwing his fiancée down the stairs he wasn’t too worried about violent crime. He knows nothing about the legal system. Definitely gets paid to lie. I hope he gets caught in one of his multiple lies. He is a violent man with no brain who writes bullshit. And has fans who are an embarrassment.
But you, yourself, paid for a top-fan badge. Should that be a top-embarrassment badge?
Should you paid-for top-fan badge be a top-embarrassment badge then?
Yeah probably. You make a good point. But it just seems irritating that Will gets to write whatever he gets paid to write, and then act like he is a real news guy. I assume “top fan” just means I come here a lot. But that’s because I cannot stand the lies and propoganda he gets paid to spread.
Thanks for responding civilly.
And I agree that many, perhaps most, positions Will Folks takes are nakedly either paid-for or pandering to the racism/xenophobia of the majority of his readers/subscribers.
But, to Will Folks’ credit, he MOSTLY honors his open-mic promise in letting through my comments which are sure to antagonize the majority because I am a non-lawyer independent thinker who, for example, insists that life begins at conception and that the death penalty promotes crimes and murders in addition to being murder in itself. Probably only Pope Leo XIV and his cardinal/bishop for South Carolina are such staunch combined anti-abortion-anti-capital-punishment for South Carolina; and neither of them is likely to read, much less comment in, FITSNews.
But I believe in the parable of the seed-sower; and I hope that, as a father of eight, Will Folks takes seriously his duty to expose his children to examples of moral courage.
So, let’s keep posting, God so willing and FITS permitting.
Happy New Year!
Update: I withdraw my mistaken compliment to Will Folks as generally keeping his open-mic policy. He has six times so far refused to let through my reply to CongareeCatfish even though it is, like all my writing, Catholic-school-polite, medical-school-scientific, and Dr.-Marie-Faltas-quality reasoned, objective and witty.
Of these three major issues, the matter of Lucas trying to take the Supreme Court Chief Justice slot concerns me the most in the short run. He is clearly unqualified for the job (but to be fair, there’s only a handful of people who are) and trying to make some extremely “creative” fairy-dust argument that the age restriction – that has been around a long time- won’t apply to him is extremely concerning. That speaks volumes as to what he will do on the court to engage in specious legal acrobatics achieve the outcome he desires.
I thrice tried to post a reply; but to no avail.
I shall, God willing, try one more time. If Will Folks still censors it, I’ll leave you to imagine it.