PALMETTO STATE SLOWLY BUT SURELY ADVANCING MARKET-BASED REFORM
South Carolina doesn’t have a big parental choice program …
In fact its special needs-only academic scholarship program represents a tiny fraction of the market-based pressure that needs to be brought to bear on the Palmetto State’s worst-in-the-nation government-run school system. Also the program currently only exists as a budget proviso – or a section of the budget that must be reauthorized every year.
Certain state lawmakers fearful of choice have resisted making it a part of permanent law.
Still, it’s a start … a start that is materially improving people’s lives.
For example …
Alexis is a middle schooler at Columbia, S.C.’s Cardinal Newman school.
She’s enrolled in the school’s de la Salle program – a great example of a special needs program within a traditional private school that blends high-intensity expert instruction with the benefits of inclusion into traditional classrooms and school activities. Like so many other successful private sector programs, the de la Salle program was set up by a former public school special education teacher – one who knew that only a private school environment could afford her the autonomy and support necessary to design and implement the type of life-changing program she envisioned.
Alexis’ mom explained that she and her husband were told that as Alexis rose through middle school (she’s headed to high school next year), she was to be put into a public school classroom with other special needs kids and would spend all her time there. Given the lack of individualized attention inherent in such a setting, her family saw this a dead end and sought to find a school with a strong sense of community that Alexis could join.
And so Alexis was pulled from public school when her parents realized she would spend no time in traditional classroom settings or be able to participate in any school activities. They were homeschooling her for awhile, but the impact on the family of losing one stream of income progressively grew tougher. Also, as Alexis grew older her parents knew she needed more socialization, so they transferred her to Cardinal Newman.
Now they are receiving scholarship assistance to help defray the cost of tuition.
Lorraine is a rising first grader set to attend Columbia, S.C.’s St. John Neumann school.
A bright, precocious little girl who struggles with speech and communication issues, her mom is an educator. She knew all too well that her daughter’s speech issues would likely be mistaken for other developmental or intellectual disabilities. Lorraine’s mom and dad wanted a small classroom size and knew families of children with similar special needs who had thrived at that particular school.
They, too, are now receiving scholarship assistance to help defray the cost of tuition.
This is what choice is all about … investing in life-changing solutions, not more of the same top-down, cookie-cutter failure. And best of all … these solutions are being achieved at a fraction of the cost of government’s failed approaches to special needs education.
These kids were transferred from public schools by parents who were frustrated – and who were making great financial sacrifices for the daughters they love. They are now at schools that can (and have) innovated to offer highly specialized services in a way that even the best intentioned public school districts cannot – thanks to highly litigious one-size-fits-all state and federal special education laws and regulations.
Why wouldn’t we want to see more success stories like these? And why wouldn’t we extend this program to help low-income children who are also being held back by government’s one-size-fits-all approach?
It makes no sense to keep pouring billions of dollars on failure … especially not when success can be had so cost-effectively in the marketplace.
Both Alexis and Lorraine’s scholarships were issued by the Saint Thomas Aquinas scholarship funding organization. Their check ceremony (held earlier this month) was one of dozens happening all across the state. More ceremonies are scheduled in the coming weeks with scholarships to be issued by Advance Carolina and the Donors Enriching Students Knowledge (DESK) scholarship funding organizations.
Special credit goes to S.C. Senators Kevin Bryant (R-Anderson) and Tom Davis (R-Beaufort) – who championed these initiatives at the very early stages. Credit also goes to S.C. Senator Wes Hayes – typically on the wrong side of these votes – for his work in pushing the program forward.
In fact we’re told Hayes has actually helped perfect some of the statutory language for the program in addition to supporting it with his vote.
Good for him …
Also props to Access Opportunity – host of the IndependentEd.org website. This group is coordinating, planning and partnering with the schools, scholarship providers and the parents – driving the movement and providing something truly unique in the national school choice movement.
Who knows? Maybe one day South Carolina will be known nationally for something good in education.
“Choice Scholarships” should offered to all students when their local public school is not preparing them for the important decisions we all had to make in supporting ourselves away from mom and dad. Students have only 12 years of school to learn, let us give them a real chance to succeed by increasing their school choices and opportunities.
They have unlimited choice. They can send their child to public school or any private school they want.
IF, they have the money/resourses.
Exactly similar to a public bus vs your own car, public bathroom vs your own home.
I thought children with speech and communication issues were mainstreamed in public schools and that was mandated under the ADA. Has that changed?
The entitlement is mandated, but not the enrollment. Parents aren’t forced to take advantage of the public school programs (although many do).
Mike – Thanks for the clarification.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), In 1997, IDEA was modified to strengthen requirements for properly integrating students with disabilities. A positive impact for many children, but eventually it becomes bogged down with mandates and bureaucracy. Private and charter schools can be more flexible and most importantly involve the parents instead of strict federal criteria.
BT – Thanks for the clarification.
Kevin Bryant and his girlfriend were not in the photograph. Too bad, she is a nice looking young thing.
Performance will ALWAYS over-ride the ignorant rhetoric of liberals…especially when we cannot afford any more failure, because democrats have so messed up everything…
It’s why the democrats are in so much trouble because of Obamacare…Governing based on lies will eventually catch the Greedy liberals…and we’ll get our chance. We just have to make SURE to implement Conservatism… and that makes it that much harder for the left to steal power through media Bull-S#!t…
True that. If states were more like Texas and stop letting school’s teach critical thinking skills and obey the law of God, we’ll finally get our country back…
The DNC has OUTLAWED critical thinking, and demands that law be based in Ignorance. That’s why every comment from the DNC’s [email protected]$$#$, like you…are so colossally stupid…
I have no problem with low-income families getting help with schools that will help their kids. What this school choice debate has been so far is rich families that can afford to send their kids to private schools wanting a tax break. That’s the problem! Since we didn’t have kids, we didn’t use “the system”, so based on the rich family tax break argument, we shouldn’t have to pay school taxes either!
hey culture trumps strategy
sic(k) willie is such a wacko. Still sucking Howie the Voucher Clown’s money to promote the Voucher Scam. Call it what you want. It’s still a Voucher Scam.
S.C. already has a wonderful school choice program.
Send your kids to any school you want including public schools or private. Just don’t rob from those who need help the most to pay for your private schools.
Vouchers would do nothing for those who need help the most except leave them further behind. Vouchers abandon those who need help the most.
That’s why vouchers are a scam, and those who promote them are Voucher Clowns.