Disappointing SC Education Field

CLOWNS TO THE LEFT OF US … JOKERS TO THE RIGHT To say the field of candidates for S.C. Superintendent of Education is underwhelming would be an understatement … which is probably why it’s a good thing this office has virtually no power. Seriously … we haven’t seen one candidate…


To say the field of candidates for S.C. Superintendent of Education is underwhelming would be an understatement … which is probably why it’s a good thing this office has virtually no power.

Seriously … we haven’t seen one candidate file for this seat who is worth a damn (not that a candidate worth a damn could do much to wrestle power away from local school boards and the S.C. General Assembly).

We thought a solid candidate was going to emerge this week when Charmeka Childs – a deputy state superintendent – announced her candidacy.

Our founding editor worked with Childs in the administration of former S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford (serving as the ex-governor’s education advisor), and had high hopes she would be building her campaign around aggressive market-based reforms.

Not so much, apparently. At least not according to early reports …

Childs told The (Columbia, S.C.) State newspaper this week that if elected she would “focus on improving the effectiveness and quality of instruction that our teachers offer,” adding “that is something that is an important part of preparing our students for what they will face when they leave high school.”

Wait … huh?

Any candidate for S.C. Superintendent who isn’t wildly embracing a universal parental choice bill as their No. 1 priority should be immediately dismissed as nothing but a status quo panderer. Sure there are other reforms worthy of being adopted, but next to the unrestrained power of the free market everything else is tinkering around the edges …

So if “choice” isn’t the first word out of a candidate’s mouth … don’t bother troubling yourself with the words that follow. Because they won’t matter.

South Carolina has the nation’s worst K-12 system of education, a failed government-run monopoly that falls further behind the rest of the nation with each passing year – relegating tens of thousands of children to second class status. In light of that – and the abject futility of pumping more money into this failure – our challenge to candidates is to either stand up for real reform or stop wasting our time.

The time for tinkering is long since past … only a radical reorientation to the free market can save South Carolina now.

Related posts


Mark Powell’s Palmetto Past & Present: The Angel Of Marye’s Heights

Mark Powell

South Carolina Highway Patrol Investigating ‘Table Topping’


Guest Column: South Carolina Lawmakers Are Spending $4 Million On A Soccer Stadium



GrandTango February 4, 2014 at 7:05 pm

I actually agree w/ FITS on this one.

The education industry, or BigEd is so inundated w/ Liberals no worthy person wants near it…which is what liberals love, so they can continue to screw it up…

southmauldin February 4, 2014 at 7:42 pm

BBRRRAAAAAAAKKKKKK!!!!!!! Liberals!! BBBRRRAAAAAKKKKKK! Obama sucks! BBBRRRRAAAAKKKKK!!!! Imma slap the piss out of ____________ (insert current object of rage). BBBRRRAAAAAKKKKKKK! LiberalTarians! (whatever the hell that is) BBBRRRAAAKKKKKKK! I still don’t have the balls to curse without using @@$$#%&!!! Mom, can you heat me up some Genos pizza rolls and bring them downstairs? BBRRAAAKKKKKKKK!

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 6:34 am

If what you say is true about what I post, you would not fear it so…or care.

You hate Truth, because it will thwart your greed, sloth and power.

Smirks February 5, 2014 at 8:53 am

You can’t handle the truth.

Tom February 5, 2014 at 10:38 am

Actually that is more coherent than most of his posts.

euwe max February 4, 2014 at 8:36 pm Reply
euwe max February 4, 2014 at 7:30 pm


Tee Beau February 4, 2014 at 7:59 pm

Surprised no post on Sally Atwater after La Socialista’s “scoop”. Looks like Warren Tompkins has hit rock bottom in a desperate attempt to regain long lost past influence. FITS mentioned relevant issues, but my God, running on the theme The Widow Atwater? The pertinent question to this Washington Establishment Insider is, “Tell us, Mrs Atwater, what do you remember about South Carolina 34 years ago?”. While we admire Special Ed teachers, we must wonder about somebody who wants to start out at the top, we must wonder about somebody gleeful about Nikki’s flimsy educational plan, ie hypocrisy, and nonexistent coattails. I wonder if it would be inappropriate to ask a special Ed teacher about jumper cables. Warning to candidate Burgess: read up on Willie Horton, and ask John McCain about SC in 2000.

euwe max February 4, 2014 at 8:13 pm

In a February 1991 article for Life magazine, Atwater wrote:

My illness helped me to see that what was missing in society is what was missing in me: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood. The ’80s were about acquiring — acquiring wealth, power, prestige. I know. I acquired more wealth, power, and prestige than most. But you can acquire all you want and still feel empty. What power wouldn’t I trade for a little more time with my family? What price wouldn’t I pay for an evening with friends? It took a deadly illness to put me eye to eye with that truth, but it is a truth that the country, caught up in its ruthless ambitions and moral decay, can learn on my dime. I don’t know who will lead us through the ’90s, but they must be made to speak to this spiritual vacuum at the heart of American society, this tumor of the soul.

This article was notable for an apology to Michael Dukakis for the “naked cruelty” of the 1988 presidential election campaign.

Ed Rollins, however, stated in the 2008 documentary Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story, that “[Atwater] was telling this story about how a Living Bible was what was giving him faith and I said to Mary (Matalin), ‘I really, sincerely hope that he found peace.’ She said, ‘Ed, when we were cleaning up his things afterwards, the Bible was still wrapped in the cellophane and had never been taken out of the package,’ which just told you everything there was. He was spinning right to the end.”

meh February 5, 2014 at 1:17 am

I really truly hate Atwater, but that story Rollins story, always struck me as apocryphal/BS – sounds great, but I own thousands of books – none of them came wrapped in cellophane. I believe Atwater was probably bull shitting till the very end – but either she or Rollins was lying. It’s classic Atwater too – on first glance ‘still in the cellopne’ viscerally denotes brand new, unused, pritine…but if it’s a book, or a puppy, for instance, it probably did come that way. Part of the reason for the overlooking of this is that Mary, Rollins and Atwater had never been to a book store to realize this isnt how books are sold?

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 1:43 am

He was probably studying to be a “Word of Wealth” televangelist if by some miracle, he survived.

Lee's Contemporary In DC February 4, 2014 at 8:43 pm

I’m eagerly awaiting what story Warren will try to spin out of this piece of whole cloth.

Sally is a sweet girl, but that ain’t a prerequisite, nor a qualifier for Sup’t. of Education.

Horace Manns Great Nephew February 4, 2014 at 8:19 pm

Probably one of the reasons not many of these candidates are mentioning so called “market” reforms in education?

They want to have a chance to win.Except for some of Willies followers here , a few meetings of tea party groups ,and assorted libertarians,nobody cares about that pie in the sky stuff that has no chance of going anywhere.

venomachine February 5, 2014 at 8:04 am

I think a huge part of it is that the vast majority of people believe, rightly in my opinion, the the SC education superintendent’s job is to work on the PUBLIC education system in SC. And it needs some attention.

Diverting time and effort towards school vouchers does not further the goal of improvement.

Smirks February 5, 2014 at 8:25 am

The fact is, there will either be a public education system of some kind to teach those who have no other options, or a portion of the population will simply not be educated at all. That doesn’t change even in the instance of vouchers or tax credits, no matter how much the school choice crowd thinks it can. And no, some fake notion of competition isn’t going to make public schools suddenly make huge changes for the better, either. Actually fighting to make huge changes for the better is what makes public schools improve.

But what does the school “choice” crowd care about that? If they get their voucher and get their kid in the private school they want, who cares if the public schools continue to rot and give inadequate education to a significant portion of the population? That isn’t their problem. Sucks to be those people, right?

Carpetbagging Yankee Sycophant February 4, 2014 at 8:31 pm

What? No Howie Rich proxy? Heavens, what will you do?!

euwe max February 4, 2014 at 9:48 pm

6:30 a.m. You are awakened by your clock radio. You know it is actually 6:30 because the National Institute of Standards and Technology keeps the official time. And you can listen to your favorite radio station only because the Federal Communications Commission brings organization and coherence to our vast telecommunications system. It ensures, for example, that radio stations do not overlap and that stations signals are not interfered with by the numerous other devices – cell phones, satellite television, wireless computers, etc. – whose signals crowd our nation’s airwaves.

6:35 a.m. Like 17 million other Americans, you have asthma. But as you get out of bed you notice that you are breathing freely this morning. This is thanks in part to government clean air laws that reduce the air pollution that would otherwise greatly worsen your condition.

6:38 a.m. You go into the kitchen for breakfast. You pour some water into your coffeemaker. You simply take for granted that this water is safe to drink. But in fact you count on your city water department to constantly monitor the quality of your water and to immediately take measures to correct any potential problems with this vital resource.

6:39 a.m. You flip the switch on the coffee maker. There is no short in the outlet or in the electrical line and there is no resulting fire in your house. Why? Because when your house was being built, the electrical system had to be inspected to make sure it was properly installed – a service provided by your local government. And it was installed by an electrician who was licensed by your state government to ensure his competence and your safety.

6:45 a.m. You sit down to breakfast with your family. You are having eggs – a food that brings with it the possibility of salmonella poisoning, a serious food-borne illness affecting tens of thousands of Americans every year. But the chance of you getting sick from these eggs has now been greatly reduced by a recently passed series of strict federal rules that apply to egg producers.

7:00 a.m. You go into your newly renovated bathroom – one of a number of amenities that you enjoy in your house. But the fact that you can legally own your own house is something made possible by government. Think about this: “ownership” and “private property” are not things that exist in nature. These are legal constructs: things created by laws that are passed and enforced by government. You couldn’t even buy your home without a system of commercial laws concerning contracts and a government that ensures that sales contracts are enforced. So the fact that you live in your own home is, in part, a benefit of government and the rule of law.

7:01 a.m. Government also helps you own your house in more than the legal sense. On a more practical level, the federal government actually gives you money every year to help pay for your house. It’s called a mortgage interest tax deduction and it is one of the larger benefit programs run by the federal government – amounting to over $60 billion dollars a year. You can also deduct any real estate taxes you pay. These largely overlooked subsidy programs have enabled millions of people to buy their first home or to move up to a larger home than they could afford otherwise.

7:02 a.m. Back in the bathroom. You use the toilet and flush it. Your local government then takes care of transporting this waste, treating it, and disposing of it in an environmentally responsible manner – all without a second thought by you.

7:20 a.m. As you are getting dressed, a glance outside the window shows some ominous clouds. You check the weather on your TV. All these weather forecasts are made possible by information gathered and analyzed by the National Weather Service, a government agency. Every day, on your behalf, it takes in 190,000 weather observations from surface stations, 2,700 from ships, 115,000 from aircraft, 18,000 for buoys, 250,000 from balloons, and 140 million from satellites – all just to help you plan what to wear and make sure you don’t get stuck in a snow storm. And oh yes, this agency may save your life with its hurricane and tornado warnings.

7:30 a.m. Before you leave home, you take your pills to control your high blood pressure. But how do you know that this medicine is safe or effective? Without the testing required by the Food and Drug Administration, you wouldn’t. And without the vigilance of the FDA, you could easily fall victim to unscrupulous marketers of unsafe and worthless medicines.

7:45 a.m. You put a couple of letters in your mailbox. For less than the price of a cup of coffee, a government employee will come to your house, pick up the letters, and have them delivered in a few days to someone on the other side of the country. A pretty good deal.

7:50 a.m. You and your child walk across the lawn to your car and arrive without getting dog poop on your shoes. A small but welcome achievement that is made possible now by a local law that requires people to clean up after their pets. Also, the reason your neighborhood is not plagued by stray cats and dogs is that your local Animal Control officer is on the job dealing with this constant problem.

7:52 a.m. You help your young child into your car and you pull out of your driveway. You have now entered an experience that is improved by government in almost more ways that you can count. Driving your car is inherently dangerous. But it is made immensely safer by government laws and regulations, such as those mandating child safety seats and the use of seat belts – rules that have saved tens of thousands of lives. Driving down the street is also made much safer by a local government that enforces traffic laws and discourages people from driving too fast or driving drunk. Most state governments also minimize your risk of being run into by someone driving on bald tires or with faulty brakes by requiring regular inspections of all vehicles. And state driver’s license examinations ensure that all drivers are at least minimally competent and can actually see the road. In addition, if you are hit by another car, the potentially disastrous costs of an accident are covered because the government requires that all drivers to have auto insurance. In fact, without this extensive network of government laws and regulations covering automobiles and driving, it would be foolish for us to ever venture out on the road.

8:15 a.m. You drop your child off at day-care. It took a long search to find a good program and it is an expensive one, but it is worth it so you can feel confident that your child is in a safe, nurturing, and stimulating environment while you are at work. One of the reasons you can afford this program is the $3,000 child care tax credit you get from the federal government every year. Equally important, your child benefits from the fact that most state governments now enforce day-care requirements for group size, ratios of children per staff member, teacher training, nutrition, health, safety, and space requirements.

8:35 a.m. Your trip on the freeway is much safer due to federal restrictions on the number of hours that truck drivers can operate their vehicles without resting. Thousands of people die every year from truck-related traffic accidents, but it would be much worse without these regulations that keep sleepy truck drivers off the road.

8:55 a.m. You arrive at work and take the elevator. You just assume that the elevator is safe; and it is, thanks in part to the annual elevator inspections conducted by your state government. It is probably nothing you will appreciate until the next time the elevator breaks down with you inside, and that makes you think a bit more about the reliability of elevators.

9:00 a.m. While at work, your rights and wellbeing are constantly protected by a wide-ranging network of federal and state laws. The Occupation Safety and Health Act works to protect you from unsafe and unhealthy work conditions. Federal law protects you from workplace discrimination based on race, gender, religion, national origin, or disability. State laws may also require your employer to purchase worker’s compensation insurance so that you are covered in case you are injured on the job

Noon. For lunch you have your usual sandwich and microwaveable cup of soup. But why did you choose that particular soup? Perhaps because it was low in salt and fat. But how do you know that? Because the government requires all food packaging to have a truthful and easily readable panel on the label that supplies you with the nutritional information necessary to make a good choice. Food companies tell you what they want you to know about their products, but the Food and Drug Administration’s labeling requirements tell you what you need to know to eat in a healthy way.

How do you know the lettuce in your sandwich is not laced with unhealthy doses of pesticides? Because the Department of Agriculture has developed and is enforcing uniform standards for pesticide residue on raw foods.

Microwave ovens are potentially very dangerous machines, but you can use this one with confidence because of detailed government regulations that limit the maximum amount of radiation leakage and mandate two different safety interlocks that prevent its operation with the door ajar or open.

12:45 p.m. After lunch, you walk to a nearby ATM and get some cash out of your account – and your money is actually there. That wasn’t always true during the economic depression of the 1930s when many banks failed. But your money is safe — as it was during the recent financial and banking crisis — because the government guarantees your deposits. In addition, those pieces of paper you put in your wallet are only worth something thanks to the federal government. Our monetary system is entirely a government creation, and the value of money is only maintained because the government regulates the money supply and protects it from counterfeiters. Quite an important service really.

1:00 p.m. Back at work you hear rumors about a new downsizing plan being talked about by management – a fairly typical occurrence in these days of heightened national and international corporate competition. You know your job is one that could be lost, but you also know that you will be eligible for state-mandated unemployment insurance should that happen. This is just another way that government helps you to cope with the economic risks and uncertainties of a modern economy.

3:00 p.m. On a break, you call your elderly mother in the hospital to check on how she is recovering from her broken hip. Thanks to Medicare, her medical expenses are covered and she does not have to worry about this becoming a financial disaster for her. Thanks to the federal Family and Medical Leave act, you will also have the right to take several days off to tend to your mother when she comes home from the hospital.

3:10 p.m. You call to arrange for a physical therapist to work with your mother when she comes out of the hospital, and again this is paid for by Medicare. And you can be reasonably confident that she will get good therapy because your state Department of Health has a program of examining and licensing these therapists in order to ensure the quality of their work.

5:00 p.m. You leave work—thanks to the government-mandated 40-hour workweek. Labor Department regulations prevent your company from making you work past 5:00 unless it pays you overtime.

5:15 p.m. You stop at a local gas station to fill up. The very fact that this oil company offers this gas to you for sale is dependent on the existence of certain government laws. This company would not do business in your town without a legal system that assures them that you will pay for any gas you pump into your car. This economic exchange – like buying your house – would not be taking place without a system of statutory and common law that protects private property and regulates sales transactions. This simple sale is covered by Article Two of the Uniform Commercial Code – dozens of pages of laws that regulate every phase of a transaction for the sale of goods and provide remedies for problems that may arise.

5:15 p.m. You pump 15 gallons of 87 octane gas into your car and pay for it. But how do you know that you really got 15 gallons, and not 14½? And that the gas was actually 87 octane? This is only ensured by the presence of that little sticker on the gas pump that shows that a worker from your city’s Division of Weights and Measures has inspected the pump and the gas. These public employees make sure that you get what you pay for – from a pound of sliced turkey breast to a carat of diamond – by constantly testing and inspecting all commercial meters and scales, and by verifying the accuracy of checkout scanners. This is a crucial service, since more than half of the income of the average family is used to purchase necessities bought by weight or measure or scanned at a checkout station.

5:15 p.m. How do you know the price you are paying for this gasoline is a fair and competitive one? In many states, the Department of Attorney General has been responsible for finding and prosecuting cases of price manipulation and price fixing by oil companies and distributors.

5:30 p.m. As you drive home, you notice the tree-lined streets and the nice houses in your neighborhood – generally a pretty good place to live. Thanks again to government. Without zoning rules, you might have an auto body shop or a fast-food outlet move in next door. Or worse yet, a fertilizer plant or a toxic waste site. But there are no noxious smells in the air, no excessive and dangerous traffic on your street – thanks to your government. Pleasant and livable neighborhoods are only possible with extensive government planning and zoning regulation.

5:35 p.m. As you approach your house, you see your child coming down the sidewalk. The government-provided sidewalk. The sidewalk that allows your child to walk to the neighbor’s house down the street to play with a friend without the risk of being hit by a car.

5:45 p.m. You go for a jog in your local public park.

6:30 p.m. You take your family out for dinner at a local pizza restaurant. You enjoy a good meal and no one gets sick from E. coli or other food-borne illnesses. This is in large part because your local government conducts regular inspections of all food establishments to protect the health of customers.

7:30 p.m. Back at your house. You settle in for a quiet evening at home – one that is undisturbed by those annoying telemarketers calling you up to try to sell you something. This is because you have signed up with a state or federal no-call registry – a government service now enjoyed by over 60 million Americans.

8:00 p.m. You do a quick check of your e-mail – just one of the many services you enjoy over the internet every day. We all tend to think of the internet as the product of those talented and imaginative entrepreneurs in the high-tech companies. But the internet actually began with government programs that created ARPANET and later NSFNET, early computer networking systems that developed the software and networking infrastructure that form the foundations of today’s internet. The government also helped to fund research that led to web browsers like Internet Explorer and search engines like Google.

11:00 p.m. You go to bed. During your sleep, you are protected by a smoke detector that your city requires to be installed in every residence. Maybe you would have bought one of these yourself, but this law helps to ensure that everyone is protected from the dangers of fire.

4:00 a.m. You are asleep in your comfy bed. Unlike that time you stayed in a small inn in Costa Rica, where you were woken up regularly at 4 in the morning by the roosters crowing in the neighborhood. By law, no one can keep roosters in your neighborhood and so you remain in blissful slumber.

Government: The Illusion and the Reality

So goes your typical day as an average middle-class American – if you happen to be paying attention to all the different ways that government laws and programs help you lead a better life. For most of us, thinking about our day this way is a real eye-opener. We like to see ourselves as rugged individualists, leading our lives without any help from anyone, especially government. But this is an illusion. As we have just seen, the reality is completely different. We are constantly benefiting from a variety of government laws and programs. Federal, state, and local government employees are literally working around the clock to make our lives better in innumerable ways. Ironically, even those conservatives who complain that they don’t want government “interfering” in their lives depend heavily and repeatedly on government throughout their day. And the examples described earlier are only a small sample of the many ways that government programs improve our lives. They do not even include many of the most important services of government, such as preventing economic depressions, catching criminals, caring for our fragile ecosystem, dispensing justice, thwarting terrorist attacks, and eradicating deadly diseases. A detailed description of all the various ways that our lives are improved by the activities of local, state, and federal governments could easily take up hundreds of pages.

Many conservative critics of government like to portray it as a malevolent force whose extensive network of laws and regulations are increasingly invading our lives in harmful ways. They have it half right: government policies do affect our everyday lives in many ways, but these efforts are usually beneficial. For most of us, most of the time, government is not some faceless bureaucrat who is constantly ordering us around; it is more like a guardian angel: an invisible benevolent being that accompanies us throughout their day, easing us through potential difficulties and protecting us from impending harms. Admittedly, the angel analogy is a bit exaggerated, but the underlying truth is not: government has an extensive and overwhelmingly positive effect on our everyday lives.

Why We are in Denial About the Value of Government

So why are most people in denial about the beneficial roles that government plays in their lives? There are several answers. First, most Americans have become so used to the benefits of government that they simply take them for granted. Benefits that are provided reliably for long periods of time – such as clean water and a stable currency system – tend to fade into the background and to not be considered benefits at all. They disappear from our consciousness.

Our failure to notice or appreciate what government does for us also has to do with the unique and peculiar nature of many government benefits. The benefits we get from paying our taxes are usually not immediate, and they are often not particularly tangible either. They can be remote and elusive. This is easy to see if we contrast government benefits with the benefits we receive from exchanges in the marketplace. When we go to the store, we hand over our money and immediately get something very concrete in return – a candy bar, a blouse, some groceries. This kind of exchange is very satisfying; we see what we get for our money right away.

Not so with many of the exchanges we have with our governments. We shell out money for our taxes, but what we gain in return is frequently delayed or remote. For instance, we pay our local government to treat our sewage, but the environmental payoffs may not be immediately obvious to us. When we later go fishing or swimming in our local lake or river – waters whose purity depends upon adequate sewage treatment – we probably do not see this enjoyable experience as a result of our sewer tax. When benefits are remote like this, it is hard to make the connections between them and the taxes we pay. It is unlikely, for example, that we associate sending our check to the IRS with getting reliable weather forecasts every morning, or with the purchase of a flack vest that saves a police officer’s life in Los Angeles, or with badly needed emergency aid that goes to a hurricane victim in Florida.

Government benefits are also different because they are often less tangible than the goods we get from a store. These benefits frequently take the form not of the presence of something, but of the absence of something. Think of it this way: much of the job of government in our lives is to ensure that bad things don’t happen to us. We pay taxes so that our homes don’t get burgled, and our food doesn’t make us sick, our banks don’t fail, and our bridges don’t collapse. In other words, often when people in government are doing their job right – nothing happens. No wonder no one notices. So while we really do get a lot for with our taxes, we often get it in a form that is largely invisible to us. This is one of the reasons why we too easily fall for the illusion that government is doing nothing for us.

The Conservative Campaign Against Government

There is, however, another much more disturbing reason that most of us mistakenly believe that government doesn’t do much for us: it’s because this is what we are being constantly told. One of the most consistent political messages promoted by conservative pundits and politicians in this country is that our governments are essentially thieves – that they take our taxes but rarely give us back anything of value. The political right is continually telling us that we benefit little from public programs. Here’s how Dick Armey, former Republican House Majority Leader, used to drive this point home: “I don’t want to give the impression that most government programs are designed, even ostensibly, to help families with the needs of everyday life. Most government programs don’t even pretend to do that, and very few American families would notice their disappearance.”2

This idea that government programs do not benefit the average American is simply one part of a larger smear campaign against government being waged by the right-wing in the country. During the last 30 years, conservatives have spent a great deal of time and money trying to convince Americans that government is bad. They have relentlessly promoted a series of negative stereotypes about government, invoking ominous images of “Big Brother” and the “Taxman.” They have blindly ignored everything that is right with government and aggressively advanced a vision of government as a dark force in society. We have been continually told that government is inefficient, ineffective, corrupt, oppressive, overly expensive, and bad for business. The core message has been clear: government doesn’t help us, it hurts us; it doesn’t solve problems, it is the problem. This claim that “government is bad” has been a central political theme in virtually every Republican election campaign during the last three decades. Americans have always been somewhat suspicious of government, but this tendency has been greatly exacerbated and exaggerated by a steady diet of anti-government rhetoric coming from the political right.

The media often go along with the conservative smear campaign against government – sometime intentionally, sometimes not. Explicitly right-wing media outlets like Fox News are full of daily diatribes against big government. Conservative commentators lambaste “wasteful” social programs, “ridiculous” regulations, and the “stupid” liberals who support these things. Even the more neutral mainstream news outlets inadvertently convey an almost entirely negative view of government to the public. It is not news when government works well, only when it fails. So news stories focus on policy blunders, government waste, and corrupt politicians. When is the last time that you heard something positive about government in the media – something about how government is working to improve people’s lives?

In this context, it is hardly surprising that most of us mistakenly believe that government programs do little to benefit us – that is what we are being constantly told. Every day we are hearing about what is wrong with government, so it is inevitable that we tend to develop an incomplete, distorted, and negative view of the public sector. But it is time to set the record straight about this much-maligned public institution. That is the purpose of this website.

David Kochs Lawyer February 4, 2014 at 10:28 pm

Yeh but what about tax cuts for rich people?You know so they can”create” jobs?


euwe max February 4, 2014 at 10:37 pm

You got me thar, pardner!

the obvious is too painful February 5, 2014 at 1:07 am

Yeah, yeah, but why won’t government just ‘get out of the way’ so business can prosper? Look at Haiti, Myanmar, most of Africa/Central America et cetra, they don’t have all of these pesky regulations and government investments or saftey nets -and by TEA party logic, they are therfore flourishing…right? Right?

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 1:35 am

I know exactly what they’d tell you: lies. They are no different from any other libertarian, they were all disloyal. I tried to run the forum properly, by the book, but they fought me at every turn. The members wanted to walk around with their shirt tails hanging out, that’s all right, let them. Take the subject line, a typo, no more, no less. But they encouraged the crazies to go around scoffing at me, and spreading wild rumors about steaming in circles and then old yellow strain. I was to blame for Damned Tango’s incompetence and poor syntax. Damned Tango was the perfect poster, but not Max. Ah, but the taxes, that’s, that’s where I had them, they laughed at me and made jokes, but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt, and with geometric logic, that a a reason for taxes did exist, and I’ve had produced that reason if they hadn’t pulled my account out of action. I, I know now they were only trying to protect Will Folks. … Naturally, I can only cover these things from memory. If I left anything out, why, just ask me specific questions and I’ll be glad to answer them, one by one.

Your_Mama February 5, 2014 at 3:39 am

Damn and just when you were starting to make sense – you slip off into cognitive dissonance…

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 5:16 am

cognitive dissonance
deep cover

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 4:21 pm

um… did you get the reference? I wouldn’t mention it, but I killed off one of my more valuable brain cells adapting the Caine Mutiny to my ramblings, and though it ruins it to explain it, I can’t help myself.

Did I mention I was the dean of the university of humility?

Smirks February 5, 2014 at 8:35 am

Somalia has pirates. America doesn’t. Why? The government. Now I can’t sail the high seas while drinking rum and plundering booty. Thanks, Obama.

Arrrrrrgh! Bloody landlubbers… I create jobs for me mateys!

Long rants not effective February 5, 2014 at 9:35 am

I gave you a “thumbs down” on the basis of brevity(or lack thereof).

You could have simply said, “We have clean water and know what time it is because of government” for example and made your viewpoint known. (regardless of whether it represents reality or not)

Even for those who might be open to your rant, the length is simply too long not only for the comment section of a regional blog, but the NYT’s would have at least cut it in half if they would have deemed it “op-ed” worthy.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 9:41 am


tomstickler February 5, 2014 at 11:10 am

Plagiarism is for people like Rand Paul. Give some credit for this fine post.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 11:22 am

They stole my post!

Yep! February 5, 2014 at 11:49 am

Oh no, you posted someone else’s thoughts without crediting them.

How horrible for you.

Do you feel like a fraud or does your inner ego help cultivate the proper response to avoid dealing with your conscience and save face?

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 12:35 pm

a) fraud

I also use the dictionary.

Yep! February 5, 2014 at 11:47 am

“Plagiarism is for people like Rand Paul.”

or others that post the “Borowitz Report” without crediting it to the proper author until one day someone points it out.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 12:38 pm

Please allow me to extend my heartfelt thanks for making it your private hell to correct these callous infringements to the sanctity of intellectual property.

Yep! February 5, 2014 at 1:41 pm

Without you realizing it, I did you a favor and you somehow didn’t catch that your response would have been better suited to Tom. Then again, sarcasm doesn’t come off well in print.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 1:46 pm

It’s all good. I try to imagine the whole interaction process as a bunch of people in the cold sharing a single bottle of Mad Dog in a brown paper bag…

pointless February 5, 2014 at 12:57 am

since whatever person is elected to superintedant of ed is going to have to run the state’s PUBLIC school system – whether each and every school, or only 10 perecent of the schools because all the rest went ‘private’ by being funded with taxpayer money, how does their position on school choice really matter?

If someone is running for the post and constantly going off about school choice to divert tax payer funds to private schools that wont come under their purview as superintendent – I will truly wander what the point of their candidacy is and why they dont just talk about the job their running for REGARDLESS of their position on ‘school choice’?

ALG sucks February 5, 2014 at 4:58 am

“Any candidate for S.C. Superintendent who isn’t wildly embracing a universal parental choice bill as their No. 1 priority should be immediately dismissed as nothing but a status quo panderer.”

And any candidate or “journalist” being funded by Howie Rich who does not spew the nonsense might be immediately stripped of funding.

You earned your $1 for today Will…good Boy! Now sit.

Smirks February 5, 2014 at 8:42 am

Candidate X: “I have great plans to reform our education system, plans that have been proven to work, plans that both Republicans and Democrats can get behind. I would like to implement those plans”

Howard Rich: “Does it involve vouchers?”

Candidate X: “Uh, no?”

Howard Rich: “Fuck off.”

FITSNews: “Candidate X is a ‘Republican’/leftist Democrat status-quo educrat politician, here are five ALG/Cato articles that agree with me.”

I’m a better psychic than Miss Cleo.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 9:12 am

What we do KNOW…is that democrats have had a stranglehold on the education system for 50 years, and it just gets worse, and more immoral…and now you’re trying to stuff Common Core down our throats. It’s the Obamacare of schools.

You have to be one pretty closed-minded SOB to hate a man, because he does not feed your greed and continual failure of our children.

Thomas February 5, 2014 at 8:18 am

Any S.C. Superintendent that does not push public schools away from the “Communist Core” curriculum and into the first, tried, and proven IB Certification methods for teaching and learning is just hooking up for a boost in pension payouts from a troubled and unsustainable SC retirement scam. Any push into “Communist Core” would validate Choice Scholarships with school access to the SC teachers retirement system as part and parcel to implementing a school choice, school equality law.

Smirks February 5, 2014 at 8:27 am

Really? “Communist Core?” I get the criticisms of Common Core, but please, stop inserting “socialist” and “communist” into everything you hate just because you hate it. Enough with the Red Scare bullshit.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 9:30 am

Just read what the US Supt. of Education said is the REASON for Common Core. It was very racist, hateful and fit in w/ Obama’s plan for REVENGE on the Americans he does not like.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 9:39 am

You certainly aren’t like a box of chocolates. Forrest told me.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 9:46 am

But you are like a box of rocks. Hard, not too bright and negative…and difficult to break through to.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 9:58 am

Common Core is much needed in our educational system. Actually a curriculum that teaches something other than teaching to a test. Also teaches critical thinking skills, which is obviously much needed as referenced by some posts in this thread. And, sir, you’ve described your angry, negative self to a “T.” Also, I’m against vouchers if they take ANY funds from public education. It’s just another attempt a socio-economic segregation…. not to mention the “other” type. Party on, sweetness.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 11:01 am

You might need to do some homework. Common Core is a “common” standard that maintains the need for strict and uniform testing.

Opponents don’t like it because it is just another plan for centralized control, and benefits the curriculum-makers (education industry parasites) who can get the gov’t contract to sell to every school district in America, if CC is imposed.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 12:31 pm

Common Core is designed to help the USA become competitive on the global market. We are currently ranked 17th in Reading with a score of 500; 23rd in Science/score 502; and 31st in Math/score 487. This is according to the PISA rankings that are used for education. PISA averages= Reading 493; Science 496 and Math 501. We are not competitive with these scores.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 12:53 pm

Nice cut and paste [email protected]$$…but yall have been spending Trillions to get us behind, claiming you had all the answers. Why in the H#!! should we give you more control of the thing you have Effed Up so badly????

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 12:57 pm

That isn’t a cut and paste, my words but using readily available statistics. Looks like you are the [email protected] now, well, you’ve looked like a [email protected] since I first discovered your posts. BTW, you and your ilk are the fu*ker uppers and have been for a very long time.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 1:08 pm

So you’re saying: Conservatives have been in charge of education???…LMAO…You are very uninformed. (not a surprise.)

Anyway: your initial, and erroneous, claim was that CC would eliminate standardized tests. Now you’re pulling statistics about World Rank as your excuse for CC.

Do you think I’m that stupid…or are you that stupid?

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 2:12 pm

I think you are really more than stupid. Imbecilic is more like it. BTW I was referring to more than education in that post. Bless you heart. Her comes the short bus.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 2:59 pm

Typical liberal. You get a kick out of attacking special needs children to try to insult me, because I revealed you as the dolt you are.

People who ride the short bus don’t have a choice. I’m assuming you do have a choice. Yet, you represent yourself as very simple-minded, w/ no ability to articulate why you believe some of the ignorant and failed policies you promote. The special needs kids I know have an innate ability to learn from their mistakes and they don’t HATE their benefactors. That’s more than I can say for you, and the rest of the America-hating liberals.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 3:07 pm

All your posts are typical asshatery. You are America-hating. It’s obvious in every thing that you post. You are sucking off the teat of the government while at the same time hating it and yourself. You have a choice, yet choose to be a hateful, ignorant asshat. It’s not too late to change but you would have to be self aware first. No one would ever accuse you of that, however.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 3:47 pm

One thing I’m sure of. You have some IQ issues. Now I don’t hold that against anyone. I am more than anything grateful for my intellect and the discernment the Good Lord has bestowed upon me.

And while I don’t fault you for not being bright, it does bother me when people who do not have adequate intellectual ability, spout off all the time.

It’s how you ended up looking so bad in this exchange. It may be a good idea to study each salvo, and response. And figure out that educating yourself is a good idea, before running your mouth. Lest you look even more ignorant.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 3:50 pm

I’m not the one looking ignorant, hateful, or myopic. Troglodyte alert!

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 4:14 pm

Quit trying so hard. We know the deal.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 4:31 pm

Woman! Know your place!

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 5:03 pm

I guess “they” expect intelligent women to repeat by rote what “they” tell her to say and think, walk 5 steps behind with head down, and stfu. Not going to happen.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 5:05 pm

I have no idea what they mean when they talk about women beyond their sexual slobberings. A “Southern Gentleman” seems to be a conservative fiction.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 5:12 pm

That’s all they can do…. talk about it in derogatory terms about women. If they ever got a real woman they would be flummoxed.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 5:23 pm

It’s their own personally created hell – dictating rather than sharing. Personally, my libido feeds on the desires and pleasures of a woman – not my own. Hell, I get all of that I can handle at the two palms.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 5:23 pm

It’s their own personally created hell – dictating rather than sharing. Personally, my libido feeds on the desires and pleasures of a woman – not my own. Hell, I get all of that I can handle at the two palms.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 5:07 pm

The women I know are the ones asking (liberal) women, like you, not to speak. “They” are afraid that you make the gender look bad.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 5:08 pm

Bwaaahaaahaaa. Funniest thing I’ve read today. Well, almost.

SCBlueWoman February 5, 2014 at 5:11 pm

What man told them to think that? I’m sure the are afraid. Afraid to say what they really believe. Don’t upset the apple cart. Grin and bear it. All that kind of stuff.

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 4:28 pm

It’s how you ended up looking so bad in this exchange.

I haven’t heard anyone say that you were lacking in intelligence, were rude or used name calling as a debating technique… I think we can safely say that your character is what makes your exchanges such a pleasure to read.

GrandTango February 5, 2014 at 12:52 pm

We seem to have some education EXPERTS on here who are IGNOARNT (imagine that) about Common Core. Below is what US Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in promoting Common Core standards:

“It’s fascinating to me that some of the pushback is coming from, sort of, white suburban moms who — all of a sudden — their child isn’t as brilliant as they thought they were and their school isn’t quite as good as they thought they were, and that’s pretty scary. You’ve bet your house and where you live and everything on ‘My child’s going to be prepared.’ That can be a punch in the gut.”

euwe max February 5, 2014 at 4:23 pm

We seem to have some education EXPERTS on here

Yes, but no one here can take your place in that area.


Leave a Comment