A full-on panic ensued at government-run Santee Cooper earlier this week when the debt-addled utility’s chief executive officer published his latest work of fiction in the pages of The (Charleston, S.C.) Post and Courier.
But Bonsall’s attempt to curry favor with the S.C. General Assembly backfired big time when he acknowledged that Santee was continuing to negotiate a “memorandum of understanding” with Atlanta-based Southern Company.
“We are exploring additional joint efficiencies under a memorandum of understanding with Southern Company,” Bonsall wrote in his column.
Wait … what?
Legislative leaders – and governor Henry McMaster – expressly enjoined Bonsall from engaging in such negotiations last September, arguing the discussions with Southern violated a law passed last spring to govern the debate over Santee Cooper’s ultimate disposition.
Santee Cooper backed down, but it appears as though its leaders have continued to negotiate with Southern anyway.
“Once a rogue agency, always a rogue agency,” we noted … a refrain that appears to be catching on.
Curiously, though, it was an addendum to Bonsall’s column that set tongues a-wagging in the S.C. General Assembly. There, lawmakers are continuing to discuss whether to offload Santee Cooper to the private sector in the aftermath of its calamitous involvement in NukeGate, the botched construction of a pair of since-abandoned nuclear reactors in Jenkinsville, S.C.
According to the version of Bonsall’s column that was originally published by the Post and Courier, the section referencing Santee Cooper’s offline negotiations with Southern hinted that these and other moves could result in “hundreds of millions of dollars in savings.”
Wait a minute … “hundreds of millions of dollars?”
Talk about some serious negotiations, right? In fact, the only agreement we can think of capable of producing such a sizable fiscal impact would be an deal by Santee Cooper to purchase power from Southern’s yet-to-be-completed nuclear reactors at the Alvin W. Vogtle electric generating plant near Waynesboro, Georgia.
Plant Vogtle, of course, is Santee’s only remaining option to replace its inefficient, uneconomic, environmentally unfriendly coal-fired plants – which it has vowed to take offline as part of its so-called “reform” plan.
So … will the new Vogtle reactors be completed?
As lawmakers were rubbing their eyes at this dollar amount, the “hundreds of millions” reference disappeared from the column – replaced by a far-less-revealing reference to “millions of dollars in savings.”
“This op-ed has been updated to correct a mistake caused by an editing error,” a notation added to Bonsall’s piece innocuously informed.
Translation? Pay no attention to that rare kernel of truth that accidentally landed in one of its propaganda pieces.
Oh, and adjust your calculators two spaces to the right …
So … who made the “error?”
The Post and Courier – which has been a servile apologist for Santee Cooper during the recent legislative negotiations – did not say. Nor do we expect its editorial board will ever say.
But state lawmakers – including those who explicitly instructed Santee Cooper to adhere to the law and refrain from negotiating further with Southern – took keen notice of this “error.”
And Santee Cooper’s legislative team immediately plunged into “panic mode,” according to one of our sources.
In fact, Bonsall and his team were busy “doing damage control” in the aftermath of the publication of this column which, ironically, was intended to smooth over its increasingly rocky relationship with lawmakers.
Seriously … can this utility do anything right?
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your own letter to the editor (or guest column) via-email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE. Want to help support what we’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE.