A former University of South Carolina assistant men’s basketball coach was arrested this week and charged with accepting bribes during his tenure at the school – part of a nationwide investigation that federal prosecutors contend represents “the dark underbelly of college athletics.”
Lamont Evans – who coached at South Carolina from 2012-2016 under head coach Frank Martin – helped recruit star players Sindarius Thornwell and PJ Dozier to the Gamecock program.
Thornwell and Dozier – both of whom are playing in the National Basketball Association (NBA) – were integral components of South Carolina’s first-ever trip to the Final Four back in March.
According to federal court documents released this week, Evans is accused of accepting money from agents and financial advisors in exchange for his ability to “direct and influence certain student-athletes.”
The goal of this “direction and influence?” Getting the players he recruited to sign deals with certain agents, financial advisors and apparel companies.
One meeting involving Evans referenced in recently unsealed court documents took place in March of 2016, while he was still employed by South Carolina. The following month, Evans was hired by Oklahoma State University. He has been suspended from that job pending the outcome of the investigation.
Three other assistant coaches – Auburn assistant Chuck Person of Auburn, Tony Bland of Southern California and Emanuel Richardson of Arizona – were also arrested in connection with the bribery scandal.
Also indicted were James Gatto, the director of global sports marketing at Adidas, and Merl Code – who recently left Nike to work for Adidas. Jonathan Brad Augustine, who runs an Adidas-sponsored “grassroots program,” was also charged. So was NBA agent Christian Dawkins, financial advisor Munish Sood and ex-NBA official Rishan Michel.
According to prosecutors, apparel executives funneled money to families of blue chip college basketball players in order to get them to attend “their” schools – i.e. programs outfitted by these companies.
“The picture painted by the charges brought today is not a pretty one,” said Joon Kim, acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. “Coaches at some of the nation’s top programs soliciting and accepting cash bribes. Managers and financial advisers circling blue chip prospects like coyotes. And employees of one of the world’s largest sportswear companies secretly funneling cash to the families of high school recruits.”
Here is the document …
[tnc-pdf-viewer-iframe file=”https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/u.s._v._james_gatto_et_al_complaint_0.pdf” width=”533″ height=”800″ download=”true” print=”true” fullscreen=”true” share=”true” zoom=”true” open=”true” pagenav=”true” logo=”false” find=”true” language=”en-US” page=”” default_zoom=”auto” pagemode=””]
(Via: U.S. Department of Justice)
Specifically, the indictment alleges that the school is tied to a $100,000 payout to the family of one recruit and possibly a $150,000 payout to the family of another recruit.
“We will cooperate fully with any law enforcement or NCAA investigation into the matter,” a statement from the school noted.
Louisville is already on probation for a scandal involving the use of prostitutes to lure high school recruits to its campus.
As for South Carolina, it’s not immediately clear how badly the school is exposed in connection with this federal investigation.
“These are serious accusations that are not consistent with University of South Carolina values,” a statement from the school’s athletics department noted. “Behavior like this will not be tolerated in our programs. Of course, we will cooperate with investigators and we look forward to justice being done in this case. Because this is an ongoing criminal matter, we will have no further comment.”
Our view? As we’ve been saying for years, it is past time to drop the charade that is the NCAA.
“It’s a scam … the whole thing. From top to bottom,” we wrote back in 2014. “Everything about American athletics – at every level – needs to be fundamentally reimagined.”
Specifically, we argued that a “no subsidy” rule should be put in place for college and professional athletics, leaving the functions of both higher education and college sporting programs to the private sector.
“The co-mingling of public and private funds – which are funneled in, through and around college programs – leads to chronic incestuous corruption,” we noted at the time.
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? Please feel free to submit your own guest column or letter to the editor via-email HERE. Got a tip for us? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question? CLICK HERE. Want to support what we’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE.
Banner via Travis Bell Photography