Uncategorized

F-35: The Debacle Continues

LINDSEY GRAHAM’S “AIRCRAFT OF THE FUTURE” STRUGGLES TO TAKE FLIGHT … This website has been following the F-35 program for some time, chronicling how the costs associated with this massive military boondoggle – now in its thirteenth year – continue to spiral out of control. In 2001, the Pentagon announced…

LINDSEY GRAHAM’S “AIRCRAFT OF THE FUTURE” STRUGGLES TO TAKE FLIGHT …

This website has been following the F-35 program for some time, chronicling how the costs associated with this massive military boondoggle – now in its thirteenth year – continue to spiral out of control.

In 2001, the Pentagon announced plans to build 2,866 jets at a total cost of $233 billion. As of 2012, it was promising fewer than 2,500 jets at a total cost of $400 billion.  In other words, the cost per aircraft had more than doubled from $81 million to $161 billion – while the program ran more than seven years behind schedule.

One analyst recently told Vanity Fair the true price of an F-35 – manufactured by Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed-Martin – could wind up even higher.

“The true cost of the airplane – when you cast aside all the bullsh*t – is $219 million or more a copy, and that number is likely to go up,” former Government Accountability Office (GAO) official Winslow Wheeler told the magazine.

For those of you keeping score at home, that’s nearly three times what this plane was originally projected to cost … oh, and it still can’t fly .

According to Reuters, the fighter jet – which was grounded last month after an incident in Florida – has “serious design flaws.”

How serious?  The problems “could render the F-35 unsuitable for combat,” the wire service noted – referring to the fact the plane has been grounded more than a dozen times since 2007.

The latest Reuters’ article also includes scathing rebukes of the F-35 from top military analysts, including two who compared its functionality against the newest Chinese fighters.

“The F-35 is double inferior,” the analysts concluded after their tests, saying the plane “can’t turn, can’t climb, can’t run.”

Yikes …

Another military analyst recently warned the Pentagon that the plane is “a dog … overweight and underpowered.”

None of that has stopped U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (RINO-S.C.) from continuing to advocate for the program, though – in large part because several of the inferior aircraft would be stationed in Beaufort, S.C.

“We love the Marines; we want the planes,” Graham said in 2010. “We’re going to push as hard as we can for the next couple of months to get this over the finish line.”

“The F-35 is the aircraft of the future,” Graham said in another interview.

Is that so?

In reality, F-35 is well on its way to becoming the most wasteful project in military history, a textbook example of what happens when wealthy special interests, bought-and-paid-for politicians and a total lack of accountability coalesce.

The only thing more costly than scrapping this boondoggle?  Continuing to subsidize it through 2037 at a cost of $13 billion a year …

Related posts

Uncategorized

Escaping Your Timeshare Contract Safely & Effectively

FITSForum
Uncategorized

Spy Apps: Balancing Privacy And Practicality

FITSForum
Murdaughs

Buster Murdaugh Files Defamation Lawsuit

Callie Lyons

13 comments

The Colonel July 16, 2014 at 12:52 pm

Will – this is an “airplane story” you can beat the drum on till somebody pays attention. The F-35 should be scrapped and all of the contractors involved should be prosecuted or banned from doing work for the government for the next 20 years.

Reply
shifty henry July 16, 2014 at 3:35 pm

Each individual contractor, down to the lowest peon, should be made to have a weekly “ride” and personally shown the fantastic speed and maneuvers the F-35 is capable of…..

Reply
Vanguard16 July 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm

I read with all the money wasted on the F-35, we could have put all the homeless in our country in a $600,000 house.

Reply
Smirks July 16, 2014 at 1:17 pm

Eisenhower is turning in his grave.

Reply
Jackie Chiles July 16, 2014 at 1:02 pm

Yeesh. What a waste.

Reply
dm10ae July 16, 2014 at 2:16 pm

I agree the F35 is a avionics nightmare -there are like 2 billion lines of code in the program that runs the plane. Did they sub contract to lowest bidder? China? China has incorporated viruses in pcs made in their country-so if that code was placed in F35 avionics then it’s bound to fail. Even India and Pakistan are buying Russian 4th+++ generation planes.

Reply
Mike at the Beach July 16, 2014 at 3:10 pm

Please note for the record that I agree 100% with Will on this story (not that he cares). I just thought it was kindofa historical moment…

Reply
Mike at the Beach July 16, 2014 at 3:10 pm

Please note for the record that I agree 100% with Will on this story (not that he cares). I just thought it was kindofa historical moment…

Reply
Ferengitarian July 16, 2014 at 4:07 pm

Rule of Acquisition #34: War is good for business!

Reply
Elfego July 16, 2014 at 5:25 pm

Government run programs are a cesspool for waste,fraud and abuse! Government no longer can be trusted.

Reply
Deo Vindice SC July 16, 2014 at 8:08 pm

I don’t see the need, but then again, why are we still making M-1 Tanks in the Bo – state, when the Army said enough already ?

Reply
Dan Ruck July 17, 2014 at 9:05 am

Contractors have learned to spread jobs over so many states Congressmen can’t vote to cut them. Meanwhile we build tanks to store in the desert, cargo planes the Air Force doesn’t want, $70,000 artillery rounds… Artillery! Good God, when are we ever going to need that again?

Reply
Same ol' Same ol' July 17, 2014 at 12:10 pm

Sounded like a good idea at the time.

Reply

Leave a Comment