Random

Wrap It Up …

PORN INDUSTRY HIT WITH “RAW DOG” BAN Male porn actors will be required to wear condoms on the set of adult movies filmed in Los Angeles County after voters approved a controversial – and likely unconstitutional -ballot measure. Los Angeles County voters approved Measure B – a.k.a. the “Safer Sex in…

PORN INDUSTRY HIT WITH “RAW DOG” BAN

Male porn actors will be required to wear condoms on the set of adult movies filmed in Los Angeles County after voters approved a controversial – and likely unconstitutional -ballot measure.

Los Angeles County voters approved Measure B – a.k.a. the “Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act” – by a 56-44 percent margin.  As as result, porn stars must now “glove their love” while working on set or face stiff fines and penalties.

(Get it?  Stiff?)

Needless to say several of the industry’s biggest stars aren’t taking this laying down …

“How much is it going to cost the industry, and is it worth it to register our businesses out of town and then go shoot outside of Los Angeles County?” porn star James Deen told The Daily Beast.  “Is it worth it to migrate to Las Vegas, which is said to be welcoming with open arms? Florida, and I believe Arizona as well, said something about wanting the billion-dollar industry.”

Um … ya think!

Beyond the fiscal implications, this measure – pushed by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation – fundamentally infringes on these performers’ freedom of expression.  Not only that it’s completely unnecessary as the porn industry already safeguards against sexually transmitted diseases via rigorous testing and screening methods.

“We have zero – zero HIV transmissions,” Deen continued. “Our system works. We are very safe, we are very careful, and to say our system is not working is very insulting.”

Also if government can mandate condom use on a porn set – what’s to stop it from mandate condom use in our bedrooms?

Not surprisingly, industry experts are already challenging the condom requirement on First Amendment grounds – as well as on the grounds that the local measure represents an unconstitutional local infringement of state authority.

Good for them … we hope they win.  No matter what one thinks of the porn industry, this sort of overreach is a joke.

In other news from California, voters approved a massive $6 billion income tax hike – which we expect will take a much bigger chunk out of the state’s long-term competitiveness than this new “raw dog ban.”  It’s also yet another reason why South Carolina should be taking steps to improve its tax climate …

***

Related posts

Random

Bitcoin: What It Is, How To Invest In It, And The Risks Involved

FITSForum
Random

Prioleau Alexander: On June Weddings

E Prioleau Alexander
Random

Prioleau Alexander: Get Your App Off My Lawn

E Prioleau Alexander

29 comments

5 and a half if I stretch it November 8, 2012 at 1:07 pm

“Stiff penalties” would have been funnier than “stiff fines”.

Reply
Uncle Remus November 8, 2012 at 6:50 pm

It is harder to see the female juices on close ups when condoms are used. You see them occasionally in these films. Better without them. Nice to see the veiny cock sliding in and out with the lips opening and closing

Reply
TontoBubbaGoldstein November 11, 2012 at 8:15 pm

Uncle Remus,
When you comment on a thread such as this you should change your handle to “Uncle Reamus”…..or “Uncle Creamus”…..

Reply
Raspy November 8, 2012 at 1:17 pm

Why did you blur out her thingies?

Reply
little rocky from arkansas November 8, 2012 at 2:15 pm

“thingies”? You have to over 14 years old to post on this site.

Reply
Super Brandon November 8, 2012 at 1:23 pm

Actually, it doesn’t matter where the “action” is filmed. OSHA requires all employees who may come in contact with the body fluid of another to wear protective gear. Most commonly this would be gloves or eye proctections, but it could easily be a condom. BTW the fines are stiff.

Another example of creating a new law, while not enforcing current law.

Reply
Original Good Ole Boy November 8, 2012 at 8:55 pm

So I guess they would need to kiss through saran wrap as well?

Reply
Super Brandon November 12, 2012 at 10:49 am

OGOB,

By OSHA standards, yes.

Reply
The Artist formerly known as ? November 12, 2012 at 11:58 am

Yet another industry OSHA will drove overseas.

:)

Reply
Mrs. Sic November 8, 2012 at 1:23 pm

What if the two stars that are “filming” are married? Are they still required to wrap it up? This is ridiculous. I could see how they would require the stars to wrap it up if one of the parties asks that they do, but for the government to be able to have a say so is once again interfering in our personal freedoms.

Let’s pack our bags…

i want out of this F’d up country!

Reply
? November 8, 2012 at 1:40 pm

lol, great question!

Can we expect you and Will to test the law? Inquiring minds want to know(and where we can buy the film). :)

I keeeeeed!

Reply
Todd November 8, 2012 at 1:28 pm

RIP money shots.

Reply
Uncle Remus November 8, 2012 at 6:49 pm

And the cream pies! Love the creaming filling oozing out!

Reply
SparkleCity November 8, 2012 at 2:03 pm

The girl looks kinda like Brittany Spears

Or maybe its Bree Olsen?? (Charlie Sheen’s old girlfriend who is a porn star)

Reply
Uncle Remus November 8, 2012 at 6:48 pm

That is no Brea Olsen. She is kinda hot but I do not recognize her. ANyone know who it is?

Reply
Mr. Dixie November 8, 2012 at 2:26 pm

I had rather be the guy on the left.

Reply
Tally Whacker November 8, 2012 at 2:39 pm

If the male actors are bitching and moaning, I for one, will be glad to take their place in the films! If I do though, there will be an additional expense to the studios for some wide angle lens.

Reply
By 5 and a half if I stretch it November 8, 2012 at 3:10 pm

I’d need a telephoto, sigh…

Reply
jimlewis,owb November 8, 2012 at 3:24 pm

“thingies”

Thingies is exactly what this damn site needs more of. Big ones, little ones, perky ones, big nipple ones, fucking blue veined ones.

Had enough of whatchamacallits to last for a few months. By the way what ever happened to the whatchamacallit over at Turdsville, USA. You know the short little pecker fucker who got fucked in the congressional primaries.

Now that both Lt. Short and his fat fart friend from Lexington are no longer sucking on Mother Carolina thingies maybe they will go into the consulting business.

Perhaps something along the lines of hands on rump sperm donors to pig farmers. Any pig farmer desiring to raise short fat butt ugly pigs would probably be more than happy to sign up their sows for servicing.

Reply
Raspy November 8, 2012 at 3:50 pm

LOL!

Reply
little rocky from arkansas November 8, 2012 at 9:02 pm

Gee Whiz – that’s kind of harsh, isn’t it?

Reply
little rocky from arkansas November 8, 2012 at 9:19 pm

O MY GAWD!

I just took a close look at that girl’s face – that’s my 3rd cousin Nestor Hector Jerome Shuler from Pansy Rye, Ark – HE is now a SHE!

It’s true what the family was saying about Nestor – I’ve got to call Mamma!

Reply
Uncle Remus November 8, 2012 at 10:55 pm

My guess is this girl is about to get a double penetration. One in the snatch and the other in the dumpster. Then one finishes with a cream pie while the other provides the messy facial. Why do they like the facial? Never understood a girl who wants it all over her face.

Reply
little rocky from arkansas November 9, 2012 at 5:05 am

A daily dose will help straighten her wrinkles.

Reply
Perer November 8, 2012 at 11:49 pm

Fuck Will, show us her TITS!

Reply
sid November 9, 2012 at 3:23 pm

“In other news from California, voters approved a massive $6 billion income tax hike….”

Was protection required when they voted to let the government screw them?

Reply
Buford Pusser November 9, 2012 at 4:27 pm

That girl is named “DP”.

the web has killed that industry anyway…I’ve got about 60 DVDs and VHS tapes I need to sell…if interested, meet me at the rocket.

Reply
top jock November 11, 2012 at 9:17 am

This site gets just keeps on getting bigger and better — bring on the 3-ways and DP!

Reply
9" November 11, 2012 at 9:11 pm

QP,stud: Two in the muff and two in the butt..

Reply

Leave a Comment