SC

Vincent Sheheen Touts His Competitiveness

S.C. Sen. Vincent Sheheen’s campaign is touting a new report in The Washington Post which ostensibly highlights the vulnerability of incumbent “Republican” Nikki Haley in next year’s gubernatorial election. “Just a few weeks ago, the Washington Post ranked the 2014 gubernatorial races across the nation in order of competitiveness,” an…

S.C. Sen. Vincent Sheheen’s campaign is touting a new report in The Washington Post which ostensibly highlights the vulnerability of incumbent “Republican” Nikki Haley in next year’s gubernatorial election.

“Just a few weeks ago, the Washington Post ranked the 2014 gubernatorial races across the nation in order of competitiveness,” an email from Sheheen’s campaign reads. “And for a change, South Carolina was in the top ten, at #7! It’s a striking recognition of the damage Nikki Haley has done to South Carolina. It’s a clear signal of how broken Columbia has become under her administration. And, most of all, it’s a sign that brighter days are ahead. People across the country recognize that South Carolina is ready for a change.”

Ah, “change …”

Never heard a politician promise that before, have you?

Anyway, the Post‘s analysis isn’t good for Haley …

“Democrats are surprisingly optimistic about the re-run candidacy of Vincent Sheheen against Gov. Nikki Haley (R) despite the clear GOP lean of the Palmetto State,” the paper notes. “Haley won with an unimpressive 51 percent against Sheheen in 2010 and has struggled mightily in her first term. Sheheen will get more attention (and likely money) from national Democrats this time around but Haley and her team know they are in for a fight.”

Unlike Haley, Sheheen had a good legislative session – although we maintain that South Carolina will be worse off as a result of his “success.”

Nonetheless he passed his top legislative priority, the expansion of government-run early childhood education (which is the centerpiece of U.S. President Barack Obama’s education agenda).

How did this $26 million measure – which expands a program that has been a proven failure in South Carolina (and across the country) – ever make it through a “Republican-controlled” General Assembly and a “GOP” governor in the so-called “reddest state in America?”

Good question …

But the passage of this plan remains a political “win” for Sheheen, which will contrast favorably for him in the left-leaning mainstream media when stacked up against Haley’s third straight year of getting virtually nothing done legislatively.

What do you think? Vote in our poll and post your thoughts in our comments section below …

***

Related posts

SC

Pro-Palestine Protesters at the University of South Carolina

Dylan Nolan
SC

Hampton County Financial Mismanagement Prompts Investigations, Allegations

Callie Lyons
SC

South Carolina Beach Water Monitoring Set To Begin …

FITSNews

42 comments

Fastmouth June 27, 2013 at 4:59 pm

Vince is a pretty good guy, but I don’t believe he can beat the Gov. As long as the low country and the Greenville/Spartanburg area vote almost strictly republican, it ain’t gonna happen. Population density speaks for itself and those folks are going to vote down party lines.

Reply
Big Daddy June 27, 2013 at 4:59 pm

Vince is a pretty good guy, but I don’t believe he can beat the Gov. As long as the low country and the Greenville/Spartanburg area vote almost strictly republican, it ain’t gonna happen. Population density speaks for itself and those folks are going to vote down party lines.

Reply
Hamby June 27, 2013 at 5:11 pm

South Carolinians are too stupid to vote for “change.” Hell, they even re-elected Mark Sanford. We need to stay at the back of the line nationally.

Reply
Hope & Change-Hahahahaha! June 27, 2013 at 6:20 pm

Exactly. If Sanford can win Sheheen is going to be steam rolled, or in this case steam Muthia.

Reply
Hamby June 27, 2013 at 5:11 pm

South Carolinians are too stupid to vote for “change.” Hell, they even re-elected Mark Sanford. We need to stay at the back of the line nationally.

Reply
Hope & Change-Hahahahaha! June 27, 2013 at 6:20 pm

Exactly. If Sanford can win Sheheen is going to be steam rolled, or in this case steam Muthia.

Reply
Castaways June 27, 2013 at 5:13 pm

But Skipper, the professor said that Mr. Howell……..

Reply
Castaways June 27, 2013 at 5:13 pm

But Skipper, the professor said that Mr. Howell……..

Reply
nitrat June 27, 2013 at 5:44 pm

Why don’t you ask Chris Christie about 4K?
I have read that NJ gives credit for their improvements in educational outcomes to implementing public 4K.

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:31 am

Too bad he does by way of the employers pockets, instead of the UNIONS!!

Reply
nitrat June 27, 2013 at 5:44 pm

Why don’t you ask Chris Christie about 4K?
I have read that NJ gives credit for their improvements in educational outcomes to implementing public 4K.

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:31 am

Too bad he does by way of the employers pockets, instead of the UNIONS!!

Reply
Tangerine June 27, 2013 at 6:08 pm

Sheheen can definately beay Haley! I’m a Republican continually embarrassed by her incompetence and missteps!
I’m running a Sheheen bumper sticker, voting, working for and contributing to Sheheen!

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:30 am

Like I’ve said. Vote for the evilest of the fuckers you can find. Repuklicrat/Demlican? What’s the difference?

Reply
Tangerine June 27, 2013 at 6:08 pm

Sheheen can definately beay Haley! I’m a Republican continually embarrassed by her incompetence and missteps!
I’m running a Sheheen bumper sticker, voting, working for and contributing to Sheheen!

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:30 am

Like I’ve said. Vote for the evilest of the fuckers you can find. Repuklicrat/Demlican? What’s the difference?

Reply
Jimmy Johns June 27, 2013 at 6:46 pm

I’m going to vote for him, but he will be a crap sandwich too.

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:31 am

Bravo!! You are 100% correct. You got the brass ring.

Reply
Jimmy Johns June 27, 2013 at 6:46 pm

I’m going to vote for him, but he will be a crap sandwich too.

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:31 am

Bravo!! You are 100% correct. You got the brass ring.

Reply
Wayne Morgan June 27, 2013 at 7:36 pm

Yes he can beat her. He will be great Gov.

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:31 am

Beat undoubtedly. Great???

Reply
Wayne Morgan June 27, 2013 at 7:36 pm

Yes he can beat her. He will be great Gov.

Reply
Frank Pytel June 28, 2013 at 6:31 am

Beat undoubtedly. Great???

Reply
Jo Jo June 27, 2013 at 9:17 pm

4k’s not a proven failure, First Steps is.

Reply
Jo Jo June 27, 2013 at 9:17 pm

4k’s not a proven failure, First Steps is.

Reply
Cleveland Steamer June 28, 2013 at 1:26 am

Another damn towelhead, civil war-states rights-Bob friggin Jones , wtf

Reply
Cleveland Steamer June 28, 2013 at 1:26 am

Another damn towelhead, civil war-states rights-Bob friggin Jones , wtf

Reply
Polyphemos June 28, 2013 at 2:23 am

The average four year old does not have the mental maturity to retain information without constant daily repetition and multilevel external and internal reinforcement.

Imagine a self-learning computer which has only one command – “expand pleasurable knowledge.” That’s your average 4-yr-old. At this level, a child sees himself in the eyes of his parents faces, moods, words, and actions at a fundamental level. Gross motor skills are refining, generalizations must be molded gently, but firmly, and most importantly, time away from parents must be balanced by time with parents in order for fundamental progress in basic familial socialization to take place.

Too much separation at four years can cause basic confusion in the average child. Whether you are a follower of Skinner or Erikson, you cannot deny that years birth to 7 are absolutely critical as far as familial socialization is concerned. Frankly, there needs to be far more research before we go blithely of into the woods, jerking children this young from their mothers to prove a political point.

4-yr-old Kindergarten for two or three hours a day, four or five days a week.. maybe.. MAYBE. But not more than that. Better not to have a child than abandon a child from years 2 – 6 to a worthless school system.

Now, if you have a child with a higher learning capability, that’s a different animal, but I’m discussing children of average intellect, here. IQ 90-115.

Reply
Slartibartfast June 28, 2013 at 2:23 am

The average four year old does not have the mental maturity to retain information without constant daily repetition and multilevel external and internal reinforcement.

Imagine a self-learning computer which has only one command – “expand pleasurable knowledge.” That’s your average 4-yr-old. At this level, a child sees himself in the eyes of his parents faces, moods, words, and actions at a fundamental level. Gross motor skills are refining, generalizations must be molded gently, but firmly, and most importantly, time away from parents must be balanced by time with parents in order for fundamental progress in basic familial socialization to take place.

Too much separation at four years can cause basic confusion in the average child. Whether you are a follower of Skinner or Erikson, you cannot deny that years birth to 7 are absolutely critical as far as familial socialization is concerned. Frankly, there needs to be far more research before we go blithely of into the woods, jerking children this young from their mothers to prove a political point.

4-yr-old Kindergarten for two or three hours a day, four or five days a week.. maybe.. MAYBE. But not more than that. Better not to have a child than abandon a child from years 2 – 6 to a worthless school system.

Now, if you have a child with a higher learning capability, that’s a different animal, but I’m discussing children of average intellect, here. IQ 90-115.

Sheheen doesn’t know how to deal with education problems except to throw money at it. He will fail as every other person who has tried to fix our educational monstrosity has failed. It must be ENDED and something better, something not THIS, put in its place and Sheheen DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO DO THAT!

Reply
Marie Harrison June 28, 2013 at 10:17 am

Sheheen will be our next rock star. Haley was a rock star wannabe.

Reply
RBS June 28, 2013 at 4:00 pm

Elevating politicians to “rock star” status is absurd. They are not celebrities, they are not “famous” and, despite what many of you want, they are not a privileged class.

Reply
Marie Harrison June 28, 2013 at 10:17 am

Sheheen will be our next rock star. Haley was a rock star wannabe.

Reply
RBS June 28, 2013 at 4:00 pm

Elevating politicians to “rock star” status is absurd. They are not celebrities, they are not “famous” and, despite what many of you want, they are not a privileged class.

Reply
yukong June 28, 2013 at 10:37 am

Just what we need, another lawyer

Reply
yukong June 28, 2013 at 10:37 am

Just what we need, another lawyer

Reply
Elfego June 28, 2013 at 12:36 pm

Vince;
Were you part of the crowd and the DNC that booed the name of God?

Reply
Elfego June 28, 2013 at 12:36 pm

Vince;
Were you part of the crowd and the DNC that booed the name of God?

Reply
Teddy June 29, 2013 at 5:14 am

Sheheen is a big gov’t liberal who will assist with Obamacare implementation and other anti-business intiatives.

Reply
Teddy June 29, 2013 at 5:14 am

Sheheen is a big gov’t liberal who will assist with Obamacare implementation and other anti-business intiatives.

Reply
yes we can June 30, 2013 at 7:40 pm

Unless there is a viable challenger for Haley in the primary, I know lots of Republicans quietly pulling the voting lever for Vince. He’s a likeable guy and everyone knows the SC has no power. Its a legislative state.

Reply
yes we can June 30, 2013 at 7:40 pm

Unless there is a viable challenger for Haley in the primary, I know lots of Republicans quietly pulling the voting lever for Vince. He’s a likeable guy and everyone knows the SC has no power. Its a legislative state.

Reply

Leave a Comment