Image default
Murdaughs

‘Murdaugh Murders’ Saga: Alex Murdaugh’s Attorneys File Last-Minute Motion On Blood Spatter Evidence

Lawyers ask judge to exclude any discussion of disputed forensic report …

by JENN WOOD

A last-minute motion was filed on the first day of the ‘Trial of the Century’ by attorneys for disbarred attorney/accused killer Alex Murdaugh. This motion asked South Carolina circuit court judge Clifton Newman to exclude the blood spatter testimony of the state’s newest key witness, Kenneth Lee Kinsey.

Newman will hear the motion regarding Kinsey – and address other pre-trial matters – once the jury selection process has been completed. That process could potentially take another two days, depending on how quickly jurors are qualified.

FITSNews first reported on December 6, 2022 that deputy Kinsey – a former agent of the S.C. State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and a current Orangeburg County chief deputy – had been retained by the state as a forensic expert in connection with this case.

Kinsey was retained around the time prosecutors learned of issues with Oklahoma-based forensic expert Tom Bevel. Bevel was the subject of an extended motion filed by Murdaugh’s attorneys – Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin – prior to the Thanksgiving holiday. According to that filing, prosecutors were planning to submit “manipulated opinion testimony contradicted by exculpatory evidence that the state has destroyed in bad faith.”

*****

SUBSCRIBE …

*****

Specifically, Harpootlian and Griffin claimed SLED agents “cajoled” Bevel into changing a report he produced which originally concluded there was no blood spatter evidence implicating Murdaugh in the crime. Bevel later told SLED agents he was “able to filter the colors of the shirt using Photoshop” and that based on this new information, he was able to identify “over one hundred stains consistent with spatter.”

The original report was allegedly buried in a mountain of evidence turned over to the state. It was discovered by Harpootlian’s paralegal, Holli Miller.

On January 18, 2023, Harpootlian and Griffin filed another motion (.pdf) specifically seeking to prohibit prosecutors from submitting “any testimony regarding blood spatter from Tom Bevel … or other person whose opinion derives from review of Mr. Bevel’s work product.” This prohibition was sought as a “sanction” for what Harpootlian and Griffin described as the “deliberate refusal” of Bevel – and prosecutors in the office of S.C. attorney general Alan Wilson – to comply with a court order compelling them to produce documents related to Bevel’s opinions on key evidence in this case.

The January 18 filing accused SLED agents of “badgering” Bevel as part of a pattern of “bad-faith conduct” aimed at forcing him to change his opinion on the blood spatter evidence.

According to the analysis, Bevel stated there was no “possible way those stains could have been created other than spatter from shooting Paul with a shotgun.”

(Click to view)

Dick Harpootlian enters the Colleton County courthouse on day one of Alex Murdaugh’s double homicide trial. (FITSNews)

The latest filing (.pdf) focused more specifically Kinsey’s report – which claiming that “(a)fter consideration of (Tom Bevel’s) opinion, analysis reports, and follow-up experimentation (by Tom Bevell), this expert cannot render an opinion on” whether ”the blood stains on Alex’s white t-shirt [are] consistent with back spatter from a gunshot.”

They further stated that “without an opinion on whether the stains are ‘blood stains’ or whether the stains are ‘consistent with back spatter from a gunshot,’ any expert opinion testimony he would offer regarding the stains would not assist the trier of fact; and therefore, such expert opinion should be excluded because it will unfairly confuse and mislead the jury.”

The filing added that “SLED’s HemaTrace testing results confirmed the stains are not human blood.” Thus, “Kinsey’s testimony should be prevented because it is not relevant and could potentially result in confusing the jury.”

This is the third motion filed by defense attorneys regarding the spatter analysis – which is considered to be a key component of the State’s case against Murdaugh.

Stay tuned to this news outlet for updates on how Newman decides to rule on these motions …

*****

THE FILING …

file-7328-1

(Via: Colleton County)

*****

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

Jenn Wood (Provided)

Jenn Wood is the director of research at FITSNews. She is also a producer on our Cheer Incorporated podcast and our resident expert on the ‘Murdaugh Murders‘ crime and corruption saga. Wood is a wife and mother of two residing in Louisiana, but she will be in the Palmetto State for the duration of the upcoming double homicide trial. Got a story idea or a tip for Jenn? Email her at jenn@fitsnews.com.

*****

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.

*****

SIGN UP …

*****

Related posts

Murdaughs

Murdaugh Murders Saga: Investigators Release 911 Call In Gloria Satterfield Case

Mandy Matney
Murdaughs

$58 in Maggie Murdaugh’s Bank Account? What New Docs Tell Us About the Murdaughs’ Finances

Mandy Matney
Headlines

‘Murdaugh Murders’ Saga: Scrutiny Of Greg Alexander Ramps Up

Will Folks

2 comments

Avatar photo
mary mcculley January 23, 2023 at 5:12 pm

the pdf link is to the media coverage opinion, not a filing re: evidence

Reply
Clyde Dean January 24, 2023 at 8:14 am

I would like to know how we can see all the motions filed. They are not on the public index where they should be.

Reply

Leave a Comment