Connect with us

Headlines

South Carolina Public Service Commissioner Faces Hearing Over Potentially Illegal Communications

Tom Ervin in hot water over email to Conservation Voters of South Carolina …

Published

on

A member of the embattled South Carolina Public Service Commission (SCPSC) will be the focus of a teleconference hearing tomorrow (December 20, 2019) over allegedly improper ex parte communications with an environmental advocacy organization.

Ex parte in this case refers to communications regarding official actions in which only one party to the matter is present during a discussion with its eventual arbiters.

When such communication involves SCPSC commissioners – who are responsible for governing the Palmetto State’s regulated utilities – it can be statutorily illegal.

Former independent gubernatorial candidate Tom Ervin – who ran unsuccessfully against GOP incumbent Nikki Haley and Democratic state senator Vincent Sheheen in 2014 – is the commissioner scheduled to face questioning from a legislative panel over his correspondence with the Conservation Voters of South Carolina (CVSC).

The legislative panel hearing the matter is led by fiscally liberal Republican Thomas Alexander, a state senator who has played a starring role in the Palmetto State’s spectacularly failed attempted intervention in the nuclear power industry (NukeGate).

Here is a notice of the hearing …

(Click to view)

SCPSC-Ervin

(Via: S.C. Senate)

As noted, the hearing notice addresses Ervin’s communication with CVSC leaders via an electronic mail. Specifically, the notice addresses S.C. Code of Laws §. 58-3-260(I) – which governs “communications between commission and parties” and establishes “penalties” for communications determined to have been in violation of the law.

Documents obtained by this news outlet indicate CVSC executive director John Tynan formally reported Ervin on December 18, 2019 “concerning a communication” sent to him and “another employee” of his organization.

Tynan noted his organization “is not a party to the dockets to which the contents of the correspondence applies but is obligated under the above referenced statute to make this report.”

Here is that letter …

(Click to view)

CVSC-ex-parte

(Via: Provided)

Developing …

-FITSNews

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? Please feel free to submit your own letter to the editor (or guest column) via-email HERE. Got a tip for us? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE. Want to support what we’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE.


Comments