HILLARY CLINTON’S LATEST “OBAMATRADE” TROUBLE
For months, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has been trying to convince her “progressive” base that she opposes U.S. president Barack Obama‘s crony capitalist Pacific Rim trade deal.
GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump has been having none of it – pointing out that Clinton helped draft the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and has been weak and conditional in her opposition to the controversial measure.
Trump has also referenced the starring role Clinton’s husband, former U.S. president Bill Clinton, played in advancing similar “rigged trade” agreements – which are opposed not only by conservative “Trumpkins” but also “progressives” who backed the presidential candidacy of independent socialist U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders.
Anyway, Clinton’s problems were compounded this week when one of her closest allies – former Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairman and current Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe – stated that the Democratic nominee would support TPP once she was in the White House.
“Yes,” McAuliffe told Politico. “Listen, she was in support of it.”
McAuliffe isn’t talking out of his ass, either. He’s run two national campaigns for the Clintons, and has been a member of their inner circle for decades.
Also worth noting? Clinton’s vice presidential selection – Tim Kaine – is an ardent supporter of TPP.
“Just like I have warned from the beginning, Crooked Hillary Clinton will betray you on the TPP,” Trump tweeted following McAuliffe’s pronouncement.
Clinton’s campaign rushed to distance itself from McAuliffe’s remarks but “the damage was done,” according to Amber Phillips of The Washington Post.
“It reinforces that the Clintons will say anything to get elected,” Phillips wrote, adding that the McAuliffe miscue gave Trump a “bigger opening” on the trade issue.
Phillips also pointed out how the gaffe highlighted Clinton’s lingering trustworthiness problem.
“Even though McAuliffe tried to walk back his comments after the campaign did damage control, voters skeptical of Clinton … are now forced to choose who they want to believe,” Phillips wrote. “For those voters, we’re guessing it won’t be the campaign of a candidate they already struggle to trust.”
Up and down the political spectrum, there is a growing acknowledgment that rigged trade deals are not “free trade” – and have done considerable harm to the U.S. economy. That’s why majorities of “Republicans,” independents and Democrats oppose such agreements.
In fact according to polling done last month by the Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution (.pdf), GOP voters oppose “free trade” deals by a 60-35 percent margin. Independents oppose such deals at a 50-43 percent clip, with Democrats opposing them by a narrower 49-45 percent margin.