Connect with us
Pawleys Front Porch

SC

“Jenny Horne Rule” Proposed In SC House

Published

on

BILL WOULD BAN LAWMAKERS FROM INVOKING ANCESTRAL CLAIMS WITHOUT EVIDENCE

S.C. Rep. Chris Corley of Aiken is pre-filing about a dozen bills in advance of the 2016 session of the S.C. General Assembly.  We’re sure we’ll be writing on most (if not all) of them – especially his proposal to hold a non-binding statewide referendum on the Confederate flag.

But one of Corley’s proposed bills is turning heads inside the S.C. State House – and on the campaign trail in the South Carolina Lowcountry (where S.C. Rep. Jenny Horne is running for the U.S. Congress against incumbent U.S. Rep. Mark Sanford).

Horne, of course, is the state lawmaker whose impassioned, tearful plea during the Confederate flag debate was credited by the national media with turning the legislative tide toward removing the controversial banner from the grounds of the S.C. State House.  But Horne’s speech wasn’t without controversy – most notably her yet-to-be-validated claim that she was a “direct descendent” of former Confederate States of America (CSA) president Jefferson Davis.

Eager to prevent such “errors” in the future, Corley has proposed what he calls the “Honesty, Openness, and Responsibility in Notification of Extraction Rule” for House members.

“No member of the House of Representatives may address the body from any place on the floor of the House of Representatives or any committee of the House of Representatives and claim to be a descendant of any deceased person without having on hand at the time of addressing other members of the House of Representatives undeniable proof of his direct lineal descent,” reads the text of a draft resolution Corley intends to introduce in January.

Ha!

Furthermore, Corley’s bill stipulates that “if the member’s relationship to the deceased party is through a collateral descent or marriage they may not use the term descendant but must instead use the term ‘relative’ when associating themselves with the deceased party.”

And yes, such claims would also require the lawmaker to have the proper ancestral paperwork on hand.

No word yet from Horne on what she thinks of Corley’s proposal, but we’ll be sure to let our readers know if we hear back from her.

***

Comments