SC

Liquor Bill: What Special Interest Shilling Looks Like

HOW ONE “BUSINESS ADVOCACY” GROUP DETERMINES ITS POSITIONS …  || By FITSNEWS ||  Years ago this website exposed the so-called S.C. Business and Industry Political Education Committee (SC BIPEC) for shamelessly kowtowing to liberal leaders in the S.C. General Assembly. The group – which claims to be about “promoting and protecting the…

HOW ONE “BUSINESS ADVOCACY” GROUP DETERMINES ITS POSITIONS … 

|| By FITSNEWS ||  Years ago this website exposed the so-called S.C. Business and Industry Political Education Committee (SC BIPEC) for shamelessly kowtowing to liberal leaders in the S.C. General Assembly.

The group – which claims to be about “promoting and protecting the free, private and competitive enterprise system through research and education” – is in reality the very worst sort of special interest shill.  Just this year, for example, we exposed efforts by its leader – Tom DeLoach – to bully lawmakers into supporting a crony capitalist handout masquerading as a free market reform.

Now we see the flip side of the coin …

According to an email exchange obtained by FITS, DeLoach openly admitted to a rival what motivates his organization to assign so-called “business positive” or “business negative” ratings.  You know … aside from his desire to curry favor with big-spending politicians.

In discussing a related liquor bill – one supported by the state’s wholesalers – DeLoach discusses his rationale for assigning the legislation a forthcoming “business negative” rating.

“SC BIPEC is similar to most associations in that we represent our Members and their respective perspectives,” he wrote.  “No wine and spirit wholesalers are a member.”

Take a look …

(Click to enlarge)

Screen Shot 2015-06-02 at 10.55.59 AM

(Pic: Provided)

Yeah …

In other words if your organization is a member of DeLoach’s group, “business positive” or “business negative” labels seem ready to be assigned or withheld to various pieces of legislation as needed.

If not … you’re S.O.L.

Obviously that’s something lawmakers should bear in mind when SC BIPEC releases its “rankings.”

As for the liquor legislation at the heart of all the cantankerousness, we will continue advancing the position opposed by all of the special interests – namely that government has no business regulating this industry in the first place.

Banner Pic: Travis Bell Photography

***

Related posts

SC

News Flash: Jesus Is Not Your Boyfriend

Will Folks
SC

Upstate Elementary School Sexual Assault Case Headed For Trial

Will Folks
SC

Palmetto Past & Present: South Carolina’s ‘Buckeye Rebel’

Mark Powell

4 comments

Tom June 2, 2015 at 1:19 pm

Lobbyists and influence peddlers are not ethical people? You mean they are not providing an unbiased analysis of legislation for the good of the state and its people? I am shocked. How could this have gone unnoticed for so long?

Reply
ALEC June 2, 2015 at 2:14 pm

Oh, a lot of the legislation we produce goes unnoticed to most. It’s a good thing, otherwise we couldn’t take over America piece by piece.

Reply
Toyota Kawaski June 2, 2015 at 4:40 pm

SC BIPEC releases its “rankings.” SCRG, SCPC, Gov.Haley, Howie Rich….. left a few off the list for Legislatures to bear in mind.

Reply
Limbaughsaphatkhunt June 2, 2015 at 7:36 pm

You can thank Citizens United for this. Corporations are now people and money is free speech. Lawmakers no longer need to cower behind closed doors and backroom deals. Lobbyists stuffing their pockets with cash to get legislation passed is a 1st Amendment right now.

Meanwhile…Nero is fiddling away.

Reply

Leave a Comment