S.C. Attorney General Alan Wilson testified before the U.S. House of Representatives oversight and government reform subcommittee this week regarding the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. “Obamacare”).

A copy of Wilson’s prepared remarks, provided by his office, is included below …

“Thank you for the opportunity to share the concerns of Attorneys General from across the country. Last month, thirteen state Attorneys General, led by West Virginia’s Patrick Morrissey, wrote Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Our letter outlined twenty-one simple, time-sensitive questions related to consumer protection and fraud prevention concerns associated with HHS Navigators and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

My testimony today has nothing to do with the merits of the Affordable Care Act. It has everything to do with the first obligation of government, the security and safety of its citizens, and sharing with Congress the need to indefinitely suspend implementation of the Affordable Care Act until security risks are mitigated; privacy protections are provided; and legally mandated deadlines are properly met.

Despite the President saying last month “we’re well on our way to fully implementing the Affordable Care Act,” important deadlines are being routinely missed, and more importantly, security concerns are being dismissed. An unpublished Congressional Research Service memo cited by Forbes last month noted the Administration has missed more than half of the legally imposed implementation deadlines (41 of 73).

In order for the ACA to adequately determine the eligibility of consumers for exchange subsidies it must create a data hub that connects data bases from seven different agencies which include Medicare, Medicaid, the IRS, Homeland Security, HHS, VA and the Social Security Administration.

Last week, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services confirmed the ACA’s data “hub” complies with federal standards. However, the hub has not been beta-tested, independently verified or properly audited by the Inspector General. More troubling is the fact senior HHS technology officials lowered previous standards earlier this year by saying, “Let’s just make sure it’s not a third-world experience.”

When it goes live on October 1, it may not be a third world experience, but it will be a con-man’s all-you-can-eat buffet overflowing with a gold mine of sensitive information from the agency databases I just mentioned.

This information in the Hub should be guarded as if it were the gold in Fort Knox, not haphazardly. The Hub should be required to exceed minimally adequate protocols which have allowed the records of more than 20 million veterans to be compromised during at least eight hacks of the VA’s unencrypted computer system between 2010 and 2013.

States are also victims of similar attacks. Exactly one year ago, more than 3.6 million South Carolinians were put at risk when hackers obtained our social security numbers and personal information during a major security breach at the South Carolina Department of Revenue.

Such attacks make the Hub’s insufficient security testing that much more troubling. However, that is not our primary immediate concern. Last month’s letter was prompted by the fact that HHS is not requiring groups receiving roughly $67 million in Navigator grants to properly screen, train, or conduct background checks on individuals who will be entering sensitive information into the federal data hub.

The Vice President for a group which received a $1.2 million grant to “conduct target marketing campaigns and public education events” throughout South Carolina said last week (in The State), “It’s like the Girl Scouts (selling cookies), you go to shopping centers and set up tables to capture people as they come and go.”

The fact is – it is more difficult to help Girl Scouts sell boxes of cookies than it is to become a Healthcare Navigator. While groups like the Girl Scouts require employees to complete background checks, there are no such requirements for Navigators. This is despite the fact that HHS Exchange Regulations require Navigators to “safeguard consumers’ sensitive personal information” including but not limited to health, income, employment, tax, and social security information. The only requirement for Navigators is that they complete 20 hours of online training, less than most states require for a driver’s license.

This weekend, newspapers across the country ran headlines such as, “Rollout of Obamacare spawns slew of scams: Con artists are busy dialing seniors and other consumers as they try to cash in on the confusion around the Affordable Care Act.” Last week, the South Carolina Department of Insurance issued a consumer alert due to the proliferation of online, in person, and telephone scams.

The first obligation of government is maintaining the safety and security of its citizens. Ironically, the implementation of a federal program, designed to provide health care to all Americans, puts us all at severe risk because it is riddled with scams and security breaches. Americans should not have to barter their privacy and financial security for health insurance.

Thus far, the Administration’s implementation of the Affordable Care Act undermines a fundamental responsibility of the federal government – the security of its citizens. Until HHS answers our questions and rectifies this matter by properly safeguarding Americans’ personal information, Congress must suspend implementation of the ACA.”

(Editor’s Note: The above communication is prepared testimony from a public official and does not necessarily reflect the editorial position of FITSNews.com. To submit your letter, news release, email blast, media advisory or issues statement for publication, click here).