CRIME & COURTS

New Murdaugh Filing Elevates Sanctions Battle, Previews Fight to Dismiss Indictments

The latest discovery battle could give the defense new ammunition as it asks a judge to revisit allegations of fabricated evidence, false grand jury testimony and withheld forensic records…

by JENN WOOD *** Attorneys for accused killer Alex Murdaugh are not merely asking for addition
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

CRIME & COURTS

Exotic Auto Rentals and High-End Handbags: Feds Detail Alleged S.C. Stadium Scam

Will Folks
CRIME & COURTS

Who Owns Your Lawyer? S.C. Court Considers Private Equity in Law Firms

Jenn Wood
CRIME & COURTS

Two Young Girls Found Dead In Ladson: Affidavit Details Alleged Neglect

Jenn Wood

3 comments

Avatar photo
The Colonel Top fan September 22, 2026 at 10:03 am

Pooty Poot and Jimbo have repeatedly lied about evidence, reported what wanted you to think about the evidence and spun (against all reality) the evidence to support their version of what happened. They’ll keep throwing bombs, hoping some of it sticks. “Aleck Murdawk” is guilty and he will be convicted again – the really nice thing about this from the prosecution perspective is that they can streamline their case and put him back in the hoosegow in two weeks this time.

Reply
SubZeroIQ September 23, 2026 at 10:26 pm

There is no lying about minutes and seconds on each of Paul’s and Maggie’s phones.
The Prosecution spun a wild story to be believed only if you believe in magic and believe that dogs are gods.
As early as the late morning or early afternoon of Tuesday, 8 June 2021, Rogan Gibson was interviewed by law enforcement and said he had had a four minute conversation with Paul AND Alex between 8:40 and 8:44 pm on Monday, 7 June 2021, about Cash’s tail.
So, the knowledge that Alex was at the kennels that time was not some miraculous last-minute revelation which entrapped an unwary Alex.
The interesting thing is that Paul WAS answering texts from a female friend AT THE SAME TIME he ignored a call from Rogan Gibson.
Why?
The gullible who want to swallow whole the Prosecution’s weird theories of motives and timing, it was because Paul was shot in the FOUR SECONDS between his last text to his female friend and Rogan Gibson’s second call arriving.
The more likely explanation is that Paul was annoyed with the demanding and exploitative Rogan Gibson.
We know Paul was moody. He was capable of charming his Valley-Girl girlfriend Morgan off her feet one minute and slapping her and spitting on her the next.
Earlier that day, Will Loving had inspected the dove field, agreed it had to be replanted, promised to help Paul with that task after work, then bailed out on him.
The rich boys cannot be too stupid to know that their working class “friends” swarm around them to enjoy their “toys” (meaning guns, trucks, and such) and cannot be so selfless at the same time as to give those leeching “friends” priority over everything.
There are simply not enough rich playmates of the same age in a small community like Hampton/Colleton/Allendale. And even if there were, it is not wise for a lawyer who makes his living exaggerating working-class people’s claims against insurance companies to form an aristocratic isolated island of wealth in a community of covetousness.
Rich boys get annoyed at leeching friends who take and take but give nothing back just as smart girls eventually get annoyed at the intellectually-lazy ones who always ask them to do their homework for them.
The most interesting thins is that Maggie read a text from John Marvin and another from Liz SEVERAL MINUTES after Paul was supposed to have been shot in the four seconds between sending a text about movies to a girl and ignoring an incoming call from Rogan Gibson.
Are we supposed to believe that Maggie was happily reading texts while Paul was being shot few feet from her?
Or should we go the more sensible explanation that the shooting cabal descended on Moselle, lay in wait behind the tractors in the hangar until Alex left for Almeda, then did their deed?

Reply
SubZeroIQ September 27, 2026 at 1:22 pm

The prejudicial pre-retrial publicity goes on EXACTLY as did the prejudicial pre-first-trial publicity. But my capacity to refute all of them is limited. See this most recent reply of mine:
? @AlwaysAubreeLayn , you are repeating rumors which are REFUTED by the official trial transcripts of testimony. I will not waste more time on replying to you. If you have court TRANSCRIPTS of what Maggie’s sisters and Paul’s friends supposedly “said so,” copy and paste them citing page and line as I did, or hold your peace.
BTW, the so-called “blood spatter on his clothes” was PROVEN, and admitted by the Prosecution, to be a mistake if not an outright lie. Why are you repeating admitted lies as if they were truth? Why?

Reply

Leave a Comment