CRIME & COURTS

Upstate Child Sex Case Ends in Reduced Plea, One-Day Sentence

From felony charge to a controversial plea deal…

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
by JENN WOOD *** A felony child sex charge filed against an Upstate, South Carolina man was re
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

CRIME & COURTS

Gabby Petito’s Legacy: Raising Awareness Of Domestic Violence 

Callie Lyons
CRIME & COURTS

Rhett Riviere Scandal: More Charges Coming

Will Folks
CRIME & COURTS

Another ‘Triple Crown’ Target Sentenced in Statewide Drug Probe

Jenn Wood

7 comments

Be Sensible March 5, 2026 at 6:42 pm

This is why South Carolina needs statutes of limitations on all crimes. This happened over thirty years ago. Absent saved clothing like Lewenski had, what possible evidence could exist, today? If it wasn’t important (to the victim) enough to report it when it happened of after attaining adulthood, it really is not important now. Why waste police and court time on ancient history?

Reply
Anonymous March 6, 2026 at 6:17 pm

We do NOT need limitations. In your feeble mind homicide and murder charges must be had in 2 to 4 years.

Good grief!

Reply
Noseyone Top fan March 11, 2026 at 9:55 am

perhaps the victim was scared, and intimidated from reporting. There are lots of reasons for delay not to mention the reporting and arrest in 2023 and adjudication in 2026.

Reply
Veni,vidi,vici Top fan March 5, 2026 at 8:09 pm

He probably donated to Cindy Cricks campaign for solicitor. Fits needs to check on that and see if any of his employees donated for him so his name wouldn’t be on it

Reply
SubZeroIQ March 6, 2026 at 1:45 pm

For a media outlet who is on new-found kick of championing the “impartial jury” part of the 6th Amendment, you are very happy to ignore the “speedy and public trial” the “confronted with the witnesses against him” part, the “compulsory process” part, and the rest of it.
You also are regularly happy to ignore the 8th Amendment wholesale.
And the presumption of innocence receives only lip-service, if any recognition at all, from y’all.
All you seem to want is hanging judges as soon as someone points a finger at a defendant.
And if the judge doesn’t hang the defendant upon your say-so, you want the judge him/herself hanged.
You can’t pick and choose from the Constitution. Respect all of it, or drop the act.

Reply
Anonymous March 6, 2026 at 6:21 pm

Where your short purpose hangs, its all bunched up due to a length issue.

Reply
Anonymous March 6, 2026 at 8:47 pm

SC does need statutes of limitations on almost all crimes. Not to lessen the crime that Mr. Gilstrap was “kind of” convicted of but it is almost impossible to reconstruct what happened, rely on witness memory and produce evidence from 30 years ago.While not casting any doubt on the accuser, I don’t think that we can expect that justice and the truth be served in this type of situation.

A Gray
Travelers Rest, SC

Reply

Leave a Comment