Alex Murdaugh Not Happy With Hulu Series

Malicious Mandy Matney (“MMM”) is not a monster you, FITS, created; she was a monster before she came to you; you only fed her a salary and let her grow.
But don’t continue to feed her by calling her “intrepid.” “Unscrupulous” is the right word for her.
And for a blog that depends on people READING your articles, YOU should read MMM’s book “Blood on their Hands” cover to cover as I did.
Or at least Jenn Wood should. So should Dick and Jim, or at least the sharp-eyed paralegal Holli Miller should.
And definitely Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) should bite the proverbial bullet and read “Blood on their Hands” and “The Devil at His Elbow” no matter how painful readings these would make. RAM and Holli might even catch more tell-tales than I did.
But a crucial tell-tale is from THIS outlet having reduced the number of free articles/month and/or raised the price of the monthly subscription EXACTLY one week before Paul and Maggie’s demise. You, Will Folks, justified the necessary revenue by the need to pay MMM and her “work wife” Liz Farrell, whom you had just brought on board.
As far as I remember, MMM and Liz Farrell wrote on NOTHING else on your outlet; and, though I do not watch it, their podcast BASICALLY talks about nothing else except when they attack black judges, notably Judge Manning, and black lawyers, notably Marvin Pendarvis.
Say what you want about RAM’s financial dealings; but RAM does NOT appear to have been a racist in his choice of friends, employees, or clients.
But Ever-Bluffing Eric Bland definitely is a racist; and so are MMM’s podcasts which EBEB promotes.
I do not have a bias; I have righteous indignation against those who manufacture FALSE criminal charges to gain unfair advantage in civil litigation (even though that is DIRECTLY forbidden by the rules governing lawyers’ conduct) because I have been, and continue to be, a victim of that sin (“thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor”) myself.
And I have FIRST-HAND knowledge of the tactics used by those who bear false witness against their neighbor and the tactics of those who suborn them to do so.
Many of those tactics used against me were used against RAM and by the SAME people, including John Meadors, David Fernandez, and Johnny James.
One of those tactics is to ascribe a motive so far-fetched and stupid that no self-respecting person would believe it but to keep repeating it as if it were a brilliant discovery that only geniuses would have thought about it.
It worked on RAM; but, thank God, it did not work on me as I defended myself WITHOUT A LAWYER.
Another tactic is to ignore the obvious with such a cold-blooded straight face that a jury is misled into believing the obvious is unimportant.
In my case, Hatchet-for-Hire Heather (Weiss) presented photos of previously-convicted and re-convicted and ALSO later re-convicted drug dealer Cory/Corey Lamont Curry masturbating at me in my own parking lot but wanted my jury to believe I was the criminal for having taken those photos of that Curry in the act of shooting me the fingers of both his hands and threatening to steal my camera and rape me and use my own stolen camera to photograph himself in the act of raping me.
With all that evidence, and with Hatchet-for-Hire Heather HERSELF having been the first prosecutor to convict that Curry of PWID-crack cocaine, Curry was listed as a prosecution witness against me under a false claim that I harassed HIM by photographing him as he delivered drugs in the vicinity of my residence.
Another example is Hatchet-for-Hire Heather pretending that I made a toddler cry by taking her photo from over 30 feet away when that photo shows that toddler’s supposed baby-sitter, one Teresa Felicia Ingram Jackson, physically abusing that toddler by directing her stroller towards the noon-day sun without shielding her eyes and by giving her a key chain to play with and put in her mouth, a CLASSIC choking risk.
Always, before taking my word, take the record.
With RAM, they ignore the obvious: that darn kennels video was not sent, NOT because Paul was shot right after filming it, BUT BECAUSE it shows no “pone” on Cash’s tail after Paul sleeving that tail through his palm then displaying that palm to the video and showing no “pone” in it. It means that what Paul had previously thought was a lesion, a “pone,” on Cash’s tail was either an optical illusion or a piece of dirt that had since fallen off and there was no longer any need to consult the veterinarian friend of a friend of Rogan Gibson, Cash’s owner.
Another tactic used by EBEB against both RAM and Marvin Pendarvis is to make the client play dumb to the lawyer to entrap the lawyer in a lie.
That email Tony Satterfield sent RAM was several months AFTER the details of the entire settlement were unearthed by MMM from court records. So, Tony was not really inquiring, he was playing dumb to RAM.
The same theater was played by Marvin Pendarvis’ client at EBEB’s behest.
So, the money “Cousin Eddie” was harping on RAM to get “for the boys” may not have been for drug dealers but for Tony Satterfield and his brother somebody Herriot.
Also, I always believed, and still do, that at least one of the real killers, if not both or all three of them, is a female trained in hunting animals but not in human combat. That is because the initial shots are aimed at the height of a game animal’s head, not a standing human’s head.
Whom does that fit? Mark “the tiger” Tinsley’s daughter for one.
Paul’s ex-girl friend for another. According to “The Devil at His Elbow,” it was none other than the Murdaughs who had taught her to hunt. And she had a love-hate relationship with Paul, who MIGHT have (when mad at her) likened her “work” modeling at “It’s Retail Therapy” to soft prostitution.
And for a third, a lesbian ne’er-do-well called Olivia Boyles, who responded to MMM’s advertisement after the boat crash and stoked the filthy rumor that Paul and Buster killed Stephen Smith with a baseball bat because Stephen was the secret gay partner of one or both of the Murdaugh boys.
A vicious lesbian was one of my false accusers, too. Her name is Amanda Star Blanton; and last I knew she was employed by none other than Sheriff Chuck Wright.
Blanton, along with most of the South Carolina gay “community” were and still are mad at me for a May 1993 column I had written for The State newspaper proving that the Kinsey Report is statistically flawed, that not 10% but at most 0.1% of the population is actually gay, and that the LeVey “study” reversed cause and effect.
I had written that it does NOT prove that most gay men are born that way but that the differences in their brains LeVey found are the RESULT of their estrogen intake to femininize their appearance.
The current clamor for sex hormones for supposedly transgender boys proves my prescience.
But those people, including Amanda Star Blanton, fantasized that I wanted children protected from gay propaganda, not because I believe it harmful to children but because I was supposedly in denial about my own orientation. For the record, my “orientation” is CELIBACY outside marriage and monogamy in marriage. I never had any lesbian relationship or desire for one. But that did not stop my false accusers as it did not stop Paul and Buster’s false accusers, including MMM and NetFlix.
RAM and Buster, don’t get mad, get justice within the law AS REFORMED to be more scientific.
FITS, get a journalistic coup by getting RAM’s reaction to this comment of mine and, if possible, to all my comments on your outlet.

Whether FITS lets this comment of mine through on the initial article under which I posted it, it is worth pasting here too:
“Touch DNA” is no different from any other DNA of the same person.
“Touch DNA” is obtained from the nuclei of the skin cells shed from the skin all the time and sticking to the object touched.
Usual DNA is extracted from EITHER buccal swabs (also containing shed skin/mucosal cells lining the inner mouth cavity) or the nuclei of white blood cells or young (not fully formed) red blood cell. Mature human red blood cells have no nuclei.
So, for the same person (except in rare cases of mosaicism and/or chimerism), DNA is DNA. By pure sequencing, you cannot tell which cell that DNA came from.
So. Maggie’s DNA being found on the spent cartridges MORE LIKELY means those cartridges were contaminated with Maggie’s blood AFTER THE SHOOTING.
It does NOT NECESSARILY mean that Maggie had ever touched those cartridges while alive.
Also, it it more likely than not means that the real killer(s) brought with them Paul’s stolen guns which were at least two.
After seeing that BOTH Paul’s and Maggie’s INITIAL shots were non-fatal and NOT aimed at the head, I REASONABLY INFERRED that the shooter was a female trained in hunting game animals, not killing humans in military combat or in law-enforcement activity, BECAUSE the shooter(s) by muscle memory INITIALLY aimed at the height of a game animal’s head, not a human head, and aimed at the human head only after the first shots left the intended victims alive.
And I have several PLAUSIBLE theories AND NAMES of who those likely female real killers are and how each of them would have had access to Paul’s stolen guns or had earlier stolen them herself.

Speaking of making and/or keeping America healthy, and of Alex’s secrets and “crimes,” here is my response to a comment on FITS’ most recent Week-in-Review:
I am “talking about” “people like” highway patrolman Thomas Moore and now-aspiring politician JJ, both of whom are now clients of Ever-Bluffing Eric Bland (“EBEB”), and both of whom appeared on talk shows and testified against Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) in court in bond hearing(s) and/or in sentencing hearing(s) related to RAM’s so-called “financial crimes.”
Both Moore (white) and JJ (black) appeared as strong as oxen and IMPLICITLY admitted having received larger than expected settlements EVEN AFTER a clandestine cut RAM had kept for himself.
Moore even, in my opinion free from false humility, tried to obstruct justice by going and harassing the wonderful Dr. Erin Presnell to make her change her diagnosis of vehicle-versus-pedestrian collision after she had performed the first autopsy on Stephen Smith. Moore wanted Dr. Presnell to change her diagnosis to a strike with a baseball bat or gunshot wound or some figment of Moore’s fabrications intended to frame the innocent Buster Murdaugh and perhaps Paul, too.
Of course, the second autopsy performed on Stephen Smith, performed at tax-payer’s expense after EBEB’s nagging despite EBEB having collected $100K+ from a Go-Fund-Me page purported to fund that second autopsy, and performed by EBEB’s hand-picked pathologists, only CONFIRMED Dr. Presnell’s initial diagnosis.
EBEB still does his best to hush the result of that second autopsy and to hide where the Go-Fund-Me loot went. But that is for another day and another comment.
The present point is: not everyone whose tire separates receives any compensation, or even replacement of the defective tire, whether or not human injury results.
It takes a lawyer like RAM with a vast network of soft-bribed/soft-threatened insurance adjustors, insurance defense lawyers, and even judges, to extract such huge settlements.
I, for example, bought four expensive tires WITH INSURANCE from a name nation-wide company; and, at different times, each of the four tires separated while relatively new and still under warranty; but that company refused to replace them because they stopped making that size. That company refused to even refund me the price of the replacement tires I had to buy from another company. And no lawyer would represent me in small-claims court for such a relatively small amount.
Had RAM been still in practice, all it would have taken would have been a phone call from him to the tire company for four free replacement tires to have been delivered to me with a proverbial bow on them.
Incidentally, on cross-examination, RAM testified he had represented clients in cases as small as a $50 overpayment to a cable company. Creighton Waters did NOT challenge RAM on that aspect of his past law practice.
MY POINT IS: part of the loot RAM secretly kept out the settlements was not ALL out of RAM’s personal greed but was to continue feeding into the vast network of soft bribes/soft threats that made such disproportionate settlements possible.
Incidentally, too, faced by a plaintiff’s lawyer other than RAM, the tire companies could/would have (successfully?) challenged the Plyler and Pinckney cases as caused by the distraction of the driver(s), not the tire separation.
And MOST SIGNIFICANTLY, none of those so-called RAM “victims” did anything to prevent the tire companies from continuing TO THIS DAY to make tires that separate.
Failure/refusal to prevent FUTURE human injury is, in my opinion free from false humility, the REAL crime in all the stories of RAM’s so-called “financial crimes.”
And EBEB and Creighton Waters are collaborators in those failure-of-prevention crimes. Did Creighton Waters or Alan Wilson or anyone in between refer the separating-tire-makers for criminal investigation into POSSIBLY criminally-negligent tire-making?
Of course not. Lawyers of all colors and positions are not about preventing human injury; they are about making money off it or allowing their friends, relatives, and/or future employers to do so.
Now, you tell me: who are the real victims here?

One more broadcast for Alex to be unhappy about: A new CW 3-part series.
Here is my comment on it lest they remove it there?
Not a word about Becky Hill’s indictment? Not a word about the second autopsy of Stephen Smith confirming the result of the first autopsy? And not a word about Gloria Satterfield’s death having been IN HOSPITAL due to pre-existing conditions, NOT her fall at Moselle? The Satterfield estate already got $10 MILLION for the demise of their chronic diabetic relative; and Eric Bland STILL wants $4.3 million more?
Who are the greedy ones here? Who are the evil ones here?
At least HULU disclaimed its broadcast as drama. What is YOUR excuse for presenting this garbage as journalism?
And, in case anyone missed my numerous previous posts about this: the Prosecution’s claimed moment of the end of the victims’ life is WRONG. At autopsy, the food in Maggie’s and Paul’s stomachs was too little and too digested for their lives to have ended only 22 minutes after their KNOWN large, and relatively fatty, last meal.
Liz Farrell said one, BUT ONLY ONE, truth: Social media defeated the Murdaughs.
But who was behind that social media?

And here is my reply to another commenter on that CW faux documentary:
? @marycahill546 , your obsession with framing Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) is as puzzling (because you sound more educated than the others and I could not detect an OBVIOUS financial interest of yours in the matter) as it is self-betraying and self-defeating.
Let’s be logical here:
Are you saying that cell phones have a MAGICAL mechanism which makes them lock REGARDLESS OF BATTERY POWER as soon as the owner is shot?
And how would the cell phone know that its owner is shot anyway?
Or are you saying that RAM locked Maggie’s phone BEFORE shooting her?
If so, then Maggie could have been shot ANY TIME, even a whole hour, AFTER her cell phone locked.
That would mean that Maggie could have been shot by any one at any time between the time her phone locked and the time RAM discovered Maggie’s body.
Same with Paul with this added question: since RAM was at the kennels while Paul took that TOTALLY irrelevant and useless video of by-then-perfect-looking Cash’s tail, why would RAM not have also taken Paul’s phone and disposed of it along with Maggie’s phone?
And here is a clincher: if RAM went to such great trouble to get rid of Maggie’s cell phone the night of 7 June 2021, why would RAM be in such hurry and panic to help SLED locate it the morning of 8 June 2021?
Just to save you time inventing more untenable explanations, MY explanation is that Maggie had laid her cell phone down on her bike or on the side-by-side or somewhere to have BOTH HANDS free to handle the dogs. The REAL killers (and they were several) found it and had to get rid of it BEFORE the attack lest it record what happened and/or lest Maggie reaches for it to call for help.
Please use your education to think sensibly.

Barbara Ann Mixson appears to be the only one of Alex’s former employees, colleagues and clients, who has not so far sold him for money or to save their own skins.
This is what I wrote about Blanca’s today’s interview with Will Folks, in which Blanca mentions Barbara BTW:
At 23: 01 Blanca WRONGLY assumes no one else had gone into the house that night.
In fact, Blanca did NOT know about Paul and Maggie until THE MORNING AFTER when Alex called her from Almeda and asked her to go tidy Moselle up for visitors.
By then, AT LEAST TEN OTHER PEOPLE had been to the house that night, INCLUDING Mark Ball and his wife and Buster and Brooklyn.
So, whatever was done to the laundry room was DEFINITELY not done by Alex, who NEVER entered the house after getting a gun after discovering the bodies.
Don’t take my word. Take the transcripts of the trial testimony.
Blanca has to say Alex did it to sell her book just as Becky Hill had to push for a guilty verdict to sell her book.
What people would not do to innocent others for money!

Following Napoleon Bonaparte’s “cherchez la femme,” voici des femmes who COULD have been the real shooters of Paul and Maggie:
? @Carrie-k1m3i and ? @KarenSmith-g8e , at least three young women in possession of Paul’s previously-stolen guns and with some training in hunting game animals but no training on shooting humans as in the military or in law enforcement.
I drew that conclusion from the fact that the first shots at each of Paul and Maggie were, due to muscle memory, aimed to the height of a game animal’s head, not a human head.
The list of POSSIBLE candidates starts with Paul’s ex-girl friend who had had a love-hate relationship with Paul and had, ironically, been taught to hunt by the Murdaugh’s themselves.
The list goes through Gloria Satterfield’s sister, Ginger, and ends with Mark Tinsley’s daughter, Emma, who had had a love-hate relationship with her father after he divorced Emma’s mother. But, according to “The Devil at His Elbow,” a book by Valerie Bauerlein (who is now a paid publicist for Mark Tinsley in his new Spivey case), Emma “returned to [Mark]” after the Murdaugh shootings.
Add an unexplored Lesbian by the name of Olivia Boyles; and an unnamed woman who jumped off a bridge the night of the shootings.
Also worth considering is an email from Private Investigator Sara Capelli sent Mark Tinsley an email overflowing with guilt that Sara had caused Paul’s demise.
A common thread tying all those women (except possibly Sara and Emma) is that Mandy Matney had privately interviewed them before the shootings after she began a public campaign (which allegedly included laisons with her sources) to demonize Paul and get him indicted for the boat crash.
Mandy Matney also rabidly and publicly campaigned to frame Buster (and Paul) for Stephen Smith’s death. Even though that part failed, no one apologized to Buster. Instead, a separately convicted fraudster, now widely-read blogger, taunted Alex after his life sentences, “Your son is next, Alex. Justice for Stephen Smith!” Remember that?
And you still don’t want to believe that Murdaughs get falsely accused BECAUSE. and in spite, of their name?

Alex might get a chuckle from a commenter writing “Murdaugh towels never left the house.”
Does his defense team wish to add to my reply (pasted hereunder) to her?
? @marycahill546 , here you go again!
What was so sacrosanct about “the Murdaugh towels”? Were they maidens in a an ancient Ottoman harem? Or babies who could crawl but not walk? Or nuns in a Carmelite convent?
And if “he hosed off blood off of him at the kennels” why return to the house to get a museum-quality towel? Couldn’t he have left himself wet or grabbed something from the kennels to dry himself?
And why would he drive home buck naked just to get to the house anyway?
Really, what is it about you that makes repeat such nonsense?
You take the cake.

Not for Richard Alexander Murdaugh (“RAM”) to be more unhappy but to have his defense team join me in demanding URGENT action:
Will Folks interviewed Blanca Simpson and ran it on FITSTube/YouTube.
At minute 34:28 Blanca deserves an Oscar BUT at the same time makes a Freudian slip: “that [RAM] left them there. That is the hurtful part to me.”
RAM left Paul and Maggie ALIVE in the kennels. But Blanca’s slip implies that RAM knew who was planning or threatening to shoot them that night. She admits she knows who “helped” in the shootings.
Whoever supposedly “helped” in the shootings could have been THE shooter(s).
Remember? The hand of one is the hand of all. Or is law applied selectively in this state?
THIS CANNOT BE LEFT AT THAT. Ignoring Blanca’s statement is obstruction of justice.
No matter Will Folks’ friendship with Alan Wilson or Dylan Nolan’s loyalty to his former boss, same Alan Wilson, BOTH Will and Dylan must FORMALLY request Alan Wilson to ask the AG of another state to investigate the knowledge, if any, behind Blanca’s statement that she knows who “helped” AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION to the public.
If it turns out that Blanca was bluffing and simply teasing knowledge she does not have to promote sales of her book, sales must be IMMEDIATELY halted and her book de-published.
Society cannot have obstructors of justice profiting from publications of their obstruction.
Petting a dog does NOT make you a saint and does NOT mitigate obstruction of justice.
And while Alan Wilson is at it, if he ever gets to it, he should get that AG from another state to look at BOTH “Cousin Eddie’s” cases and SLED’s supposed “progress” in the investigation of Stephen Smith’s demise. Specifically, if undue pressure had been applied to SLED to waste tax-payer money on a second autopsy of Stephen Smith (which only confirmed the diagnosis of the first autopsy), all AFTER Sanctimonious Sandy Smith (“SSS”), Malicious Mandy Matney (“MMM”), and Ever-Bluffing Eric Bland (“EBEB”), had schemed to, and did, raise over $100K on Go-Fund-Me to pay for that second autopsy.
Don’t accuse me of asking or expecting too much.
Paraphrasing a Republican politician from the 20th Century, extremism in the pursuit of justice, transparency, and integrity, is no vice.
God speed to you and to me.

Alex should today be thankful for my existence, my knowledge, and my courage to post to Will Folks’ Blanca interview replies such as this to one who pretended I “clearly do not know the facts of the case”:
?”@mandychadwick8762 , I (1) watched ALL Richard Alexander Murdaugh’s (“RAM”) two-murder trial; (2) read ALL documents in the federal case where it was revealed that the whole Gloria case was an insurance fraud fabrication about dogs having tripped her, etc.; (3) PERSONALLY know MOST of the prosecutors in the state criminal trial and many of the insurance defense lawyers in the federal civil case; so, I know what tactics they are capable of cold-bloodedly and unscrupulously deploying; (4) had in 2009-2012 defended myself WITHOUT A LAWYER, mainly in the court of none other than Judge Clifton Newman, and, thank God, first prevented a jury from returning a wrongful conviction of me; and later, always thanks to God and STILL WITHOUT A LAWYER, I got those false criminal charges against myself dismissed WITH PREJUDICE; and (5) am a quadrilingual MD, MPH who, in my much younger years, performed 48 autopsies which required meticulous medical records review to correctly diagnose the main cause and contributory causes of death.
So, what is it that you think you know about this case more than I do?”
This invitation to supply any more real facts is extended to all readers of this outlet.