SC Politics

FITSForum: Who Is Darline Graham?

“Before I give anybody six years of power in Washington, D.C., I want to know a whole lot more than their last name…”

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

by JOE WHITE

***

Yesterday, the people of South Carolina went to the polls to choose a Republican nominee for the United States Senate. Nobody received fifty percent of the vote. Darline Graham finished first. Ralph Norman finished second – meaning he and Graham advanced to a GOP runoff election on August 25, 2026.

Two weeks from now, Republican voters (and probably some Democrats) will go back to the polls and make a decision that could determine who represents South Carolina in the United States Senate for the next six years.

Before we make that decision, I think there is one very simple question every voter ought to ask: Who is Darline Graham, and what does she believe?

That should be a pretty easy question to answer about somebody asking us to give her one of the most powerful political offices in America for six years — not just the last two years of the Trump administration.

I’m not sure it is, though…

Support FITSNews … SUBSCRIBE!

***

Here’s what we know: Darline Graham is Lindsey Graham’s younger sister. Their parents died when she was young, and Lindsey became her legal guardian while serving in the military so she could receive military-dependent benefits.

Graham has spent nearly three decades being a part of the bureaucracy. She worked with Clemson University, the Department of Employment and Workforce and the Department of Vocational Rehabilitation. Since 2019, she headed an agency whose budget doubled over the past seven years.

In other words, she has a long résumé in government.

She has received the endorsement of (and $10,000 donation) from Lisa Murkowski — the Republican in name only who has consistently opposed President Donald Trump’s America First agenda.

Here is what we don’t know nearly as much about: what is her political philosophy? Before a month ago, where was Darline Graham on the great political battles of our time?

Where was she on government spending? Where was she on the national debt? Where was she on abortion and the sanctity of human life? Where was she on the Second Amendment? Where was she on illegal immigration? Where was she on the size and power of government? Where was she when conservatives were fighting the Washington establishment? Where was she when President Trump was being attacked from virtually every direction?

***

RELATED | RUSSELL FRY UNLOADS ON DARLINE GRAHAM

***

What government programs has she publicly said should be eliminated? What spending has she fought to reduce? What taxes has she fought to lower? What conservative cause has she put her name, reputation or livelihood on the line to defend?

Maybe there are good answers to those questions – but either way, South Carolina voters deserve to hear them. Because now the decision belongs to us!

There is another thing I believe South Carolina voters need to understand. For the next two weeks, we are going to be bombarded. Your mailbox will fill up. Your television will fill up. Your Facebook feed will fill up. Millions of dollars will probably be spent telling you everything that somebody wants you to believe is wrong with Ralph Norman.

Some of it may come directly from the Graham campaign – some of it may come from political action committees. Some may come from organizations with names you’ve never heard before, and some may come from people whose names you will never know.

When that happens, remember something: negative advertising against Ralph Norman doesn’t answer the question, “who is Darline Graham?”

Those are two completely different questions.

***

***

Ralph Norman has something Darline Graham does not have: a record You can like his record or dislike it. You can agree with every vote he’s cast or disagree with some of them. But there is a record.

He has owned a business. He has served in the South Carolina legislature. He has served in Congress. He has cast thousands of votes. He has taken positions when taking those positions had consequences.

You don’t have to wonder whether Ralph Norman calls himself a fiscal conservative – you can look at what he has actually done. You don’t have to wonder whether he is willing to stand against Republican leadership – he has done it. You don’t have to wonder whether he will take an unpopular position when he believes it is right – because there is a record.

That’s what elections should be about.

Records. Principles. Character. Judgment.

Not last names. Not endorsements. Not television commercials, and certainly not whoever has the biggest pile of money.

I have said throughout this campaign that I don’t want anybody to vote for a candidate simply because President Trump endorsed that candidate. This election is for South Carolina and South Carolinians for six years, not two! I certainly don’t want anybody voting for Ralph Norman simply because Joe White supports him.

***

Darline Graham Nordone (Andy Fancher/FITSNews)

***

Think for yourself. Do your homework. Ask questions.

Over these next two weeks, whenever you see another commercial telling you something terrible about Ralph Norman, ask yourself whether that commercial answered the most basic question in this entire runoff: who is Darline Graham?

What does she believe? What has she fought for? What has she stood against? When has she demonstrated that she is a fiscal conservative? When has she demonstrated that she is a social conservative? And when has she demonstrated that, when the pressure comes from the Washington establishment, the lobbyists, the consultants and the people writing the big checks, she will stand with the people of South Carolina instead?

Those aren’t unfair questions. They’re the questions we ought to ask anybody who wants to be our United States Senator, because we’re not electing somebody for six weeks.

We’re not electing somebody for six months – we’re electing somebody for six years.

And before I give anybody six years of power in Washington, D.C., I want to know a whole lot more than their last name. Over the next two weeks, South Carolina Republicans have an opportunity to do something increasingly rare in American politics. They can turn off the noise, ignore the political consultants, look past the endorsements and follow the money.

We can study the records, and think for ourselves. And then, on August 25th, we can vote accordingly!

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR…

Joe White (FITSNews)

Joe White is a retired businessman and proud member of the S.C. Freedom Caucus who represents South Carolina House District 40 in the General Assembly.

***

SOUND OFF…

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.

***

Subscribe to our newsletter by clicking here…

*****

Related posts

SC Politics

Joe Cunningham Bows To The Pressure: Will Debate Mia McLeod

Will Folks
Headlines

Sources: David Pascoe Mulling Campaign For South Carolina Attorney General

Will Folks
Crossroads 2026

Fake Puppy Sale Revenge Murder? South Carolina Governor’s Race Jumps the Shark

Will Folks

8 comments

Noseyone Top fan August 12, 2026 at 9:18 am

what a great article. I said something similar yesterday. Is Graham the right person to stand up to DC or is she simply a puppet being endorsed by Trump? Lets hope she answers some questions above. State government work is different than DC. Will she stand up when needed or will she cave? Great that she has had leadership roles but she has never worked in politics.

Reply
Avatar photo
The Colonel Top fan August 12, 2026 at 9:40 am

“…what is her political philosophy?
Think for yourself. Do your homework. Ask questions.”

I kind of wish Mr. White had bothered to do just that before I wasted 3 minutes reading this nothing burger of a story.

Reply
Thomas O'Brien Top fan August 12, 2026 at 9:53 am

He is Correct! No Track Record and She has NOT Stated Her Position on ANYTHING Important! I did NOT Vote for her. I would have Liked to Seen a Run-Off Between Sanford and Fry!!

Reply
Thomas Parrish Top fan August 12, 2026 at 10:49 am

We need someone to represent SC. Not be a pawn to powerful national interest. Ie MONEY

Reply
Nanker Phelge August 12, 2026 at 11:55 am

Reality check, Joey. It does not matter. It does not matter because any one of the candidates from the Hee Haw caucus running for senator will do exactly what Dear Leader wants them to do. They are interchangeable sycophants.

Reply
Observer August 12, 2026 at 12:15 pm

We are in agreement, Nanker! With a couple of exceptions, one of which I voted for yesterday and who may not have cleared 1% of the votes cast, this whole clown show has been about telling us “I can suck Trump’s d-ck better than the others can.” That is exactly what I will be voting against. I bet Darline has the upper hand on that qualification as no doubt, Lindsey told her stories about what The Donald likes and doesn’t like. Norman does not impress me and while he will be a Trump puppet, he will likely be slightly less enthusiastic than Darline.

Reply
SubZeroIQ August 12, 2026 at 6:05 pm

U.S. Senator Darline Graham Nordone should be elected, or not elected, on 25 August 2026 and 3 November 2026, to a six-year term in the U.S. Senate, God so willing, to work for the good of the nation as a whole, in general, and for ALL the inhabitants of South Carolina, in particular, NOT to please a self-righteous fringe, and often-proven shockingly hypocritical, minority of Republican state legislators or U.S. Congress members who bombastically call themselves “the freedom caucus.”
Freedom from what?
Freedom for what?
Are the legislators not members of the freedom caucus somehow a slavery caucus or what?
All right, the junior U.S. Senator from South Carolina is hounded on her position on the death penalty.
Why is she required to be for it (if she is for it)?
If her conscience dictates that being pro-life means opposition to the death penalty, why should she be denied votes?
A substantial segment of South Carolina’s population is Catholic; and the Catholic Church now declares opposition to the death penalty to be a core Catholic belief.
And why does what U.S. Senator Darline believe about the death penalty TODAY matter anyway?
There is no proposed legislation PENDING before the U.S. Congress to abolish the death penalty in the U.S. And even if one were to be soon introduced, all voters need to know is that their representatives will consult their consciences and the facts before them on the success or failure of the death penalty before casting a voting.
So, South Carolina’s Commission for the Blind’s budget doubled during the seven years Ms. Darline headed it.
WHY IS THAT necessarily BAD?
It could be that said Commission had been under-funded and Ms. Darline successfully got for the blind and disabled much-needed funds.
Joe White and Ralph Norman got something against the blind and the disabled?
But I have question for Ms. Darline which goes into her responsibilities as a U.S. Senator.
Heck! That question should also be posed to Ralph Norman.
Should a FEDERAL Justice, Judge, and/or Magistrate Judge sit on a case where one the parties is by blood the first-cousin to that jurist?
You may be surprised to know that the U.S. may be the only county in the world which legalizes such nepotism in its court system.
And if either Republican aspiring candidate (and the competitor independent candidates and candidates of other parties) think(s) that does not pass the smell test, does the candidate intend to introduce legislation to fix the issue?
I have other questions relevant to being a U.S. Senator; but let’s start with this one because a U.S. Senator suggest to the President, and votes on, federal judges and justices.

Reply
Just Another Guest August 12, 2026 at 6:29 pm

Hatred of immigrants and love of money should not the main, or only, qualifications to be elected for office in or from South Carolina.
Take health issues.
As a woman, does Senator Darline and/or Dr. Annie Andrews plan to introduce legislation to lift the barriers against breast-feeding in the work place, in educational establishments, in public transportation, etc.?
One of the best kept secrets is that breast-feeding reduces the risk of breast cancer in the mother in addition to its many other benefits for the mother and for the baby.
Can there be a federal tax credit for breast-feeding equipment and/or free beast pumps?
Can there be mandatory work/education breaks for breast-feeding analogous to the Family Leave Act?
These are just ideas more important than whether the aspiring U.S. Senator passes a “Freedom Caucus'” fancy.
And analogous to RIFRA, can there be legislation to enable parturient inmates (these are not rare) to breastfeed in prison?
The babies have committed no crime to be denied the mother’s milk even if the mother were a convict.
Should there be decency legislation prohibiting evictions in extremes of temperatures, say above 88 or below 25 Fahrenheit?
Muscularity is sometimes toxic; and when not tempered with decency, can be counter-productive.
I wish there were a “Decency Caucus” of federal and state legislators. And I hope the new U.S. Senator from South Carolina starts one.

Reply

Leave a Comment