Yesterday, I reported on a plan by Charlotte-based Duke Energy to make South Carolina residents pay for up to a third of the costs associated with a massive buildout of infrastructure in North Carolina – an expansion necessitated by the utility’s ongoing failure to responsibly manage its energy mix.
I support the buildout – part of the ongoing natural gas “bridge” from coal-fired power to more renewable energy sources – but the way Duke and its bought-and-paid for politicians are going about it it is grossly unfair to ratepayers.
These natural gas assets only make sense if they are allowed to operate until the end of their natural life expectancy. Duke wants to cut that expectancy short to meet its goal of “carbon neutrality” by 2050.
That’s a laudable goal … but a recent report revealed that achieving it via Duke’s planned gas buildout would leave ratepayers with more than $5 billion in “stranded assets.”
Duke scored a big win last month when Tar Heel governor Roy Cooper signed House Bill 951 – empowering the utility to impose new, multi-year rate hikes on North Carolinians to recover the costs of this expansion.
While I opposed that bill, I took some comfort in knowing it wasn’t directly screwing over South Carolina ratepayers.
Boy, was I wrong …
Last week, Duke asked members of the S.C. Public Service Commission (SCPSC) to essentially come under the authority of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) – an entity which (like the North Carolina legislature) has been known to do the bidding of this $76.8 billion corporation.
Why does Duke want the SCPSC to bend to its will? Easy … so South Carolina ratepayers are forced to shell out for the North Carolina buildout.
You can read all about this egregious “taxation without representation” scheme by clicking here …
In the meantime, SCPSC members have scheduled a hearing on Duke’s request …
(Click to view)Special-Agenda-Meeting-Week-of-11-15-21
Here’s hoping these commissioners summon the requisite cojones to stand up to Duke. Or at the very least, here’s hoping they follow the recommendation of the S.C. Office of Regulatory Staff (SCORS) and open this process up to public scrutiny.
SCORS sent a letter (.pdf) to commissioners last week on the heels of Duke’s request citing “serious concerns about the requested timeline proposed by (Duke).”
“Moreover, (SCORS) is also making other stakeholders aware of Duke’s filing and based on initial indications, other stakeholders agree that additional time is needed to review and comment on (Duke’s) petition given its significant and wide-ranging implications,” the letter noted.
Translation? Hold the flippin’ phone …
More importantly, the letter sought to “confirm that (Duke’s) plans and associated costs for the transition … will be fully shared and embraced between the states consistent with historic planning purposes.”
Yeah … to the tune of billions of dollars.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR …
Will Folks is the founding editor of the news outlet you are currently reading. Prior to founding FITSNews, he served as press secretary to the governor of South Carolina. He lives in the Midlands region of the state with his wife and seven children. And yes, he has LOTS of hats (including that New York Mets’ lid pictured above).
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
SIGN UP …
SIGN UP …