“We do not believe Tanner’s contract extension was deserved,” we wrote. “At all.”
This week – with lame duck South Carolina president Harris Pastides on his way out the door and the search for his replacement in the midst of a major meltdown – the school inexplicably gave Tanner another two year extension at his current salary of $900,000 per year.
Which means the 61-year-old former baseball coach will be South Carolina’s athletics director through 2024.
“I’m very grateful for the support of (outgoing president Harris) Pastides and this board,” Tanner said in a statement. “They have accepted me into their inner circle, and I am grateful for the opportunity to continue.”
We bet Tanner is grateful for the opportunity to continue … very grateful … the question is whether he deserves that opportunity.
And another important question: Why was this decision made prior to the school hiring its next president?
What a shady way to do business … basically kneecapping the school’s incoming leader on one of the most important decisions they will face.
Back to the original issue, though: What has Tanner done over the last two years to warrant a two-year extension?
We aren’t exactly sure …
South Carolina’s once-proud football program – which was ranked among the nation’s top 25 teams for a school-record 69 consecutive polls from 2010-2014 – is backsliding badly under fourth-year head coach Will Muschamp.
With an insanely difficult schedule on tap …
Then there is the school’s baseball program – which won a pair of national championships in 2010 and 2011 (with Tanner as coach). After backsliding precipitously under Tanner’s hand-picked replacement, Chad Holbrook, the program is currently experiencing its worst season since joining the SEC in 1992 under second-year coach Mark Kingston – Tanner’s choice to rebuild the program his chosen successor allowed to fall apart.
Bottom line? There is absolutely no justification for Tanner receiving a contract extension – under any circumstances. The fact South Carolina has chosen to extend his contract in the midst of a catastrophically mismanaged presidential search is even more disheartening … and again, discouraging to any credible candidate looking to take the reins of this mismanaged university.
The only thing working in the school’s favor in all of this? Its mediocrity-acclimated, self-loathing fan base – which is so full of “homer” apologists that decisions like this are usually swallowed hook, line and sinker.
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our stories? Please feel free to submit your own letter to the editor (or guest column) via-email HERE. Got a tip for us? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE. Want to support what we’re doing? SUBSCRIBE HERE.