Uncategorized

Lazenby: The Battle Over “Plan B”

On April 4, 2013, federal Judge Edward Korman of the Eastern District of New York handed down a decision declaring that emergency contraception, better known as the “morning-after pill” or “Plan-B,” must be made available to people of all ages without a prescription. He then gave the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama…

On April 4, 2013, federal Judge Edward Korman of the Eastern District of New York handed down a decision declaring that emergency contraception, better known as the “morning-after pill” or “Plan-B,” must be made available to people of all ages without a prescription.

He then gave the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama thirty days to comply with his decision.

Prior to the judge’s ruling girls sixteen and younger had to have a prescription to buy the morning-after pill, which helps prevent pregnancy after sexual intercourse. In his ruling, Korman called the Obama administration’s 2011 decision to prevent Plan-B from becoming more widely available “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.” After all, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s own studies found that Plan-B was safe and effective and should be made more widely available as a means of emergency contraception. Yet despite those findings, in 2011 Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, ruled that the pill would be available without a prescription only to those aged seventeen and over, and it would be kept behind the counter in pharmacies, with identification and proof of age required to purchase it.

This was the first time that the FDA – a regulatory arm of the administration – was publicly overruled by a cabinet secretary.

Yesterday, just a few days short of the court’s deadline, the FDA announced its decision to make “Plan B-One Step,” a particular formulation of the drug sold by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., available without a prescription to those fifteen years and older who show proof of age. In an effort to enforce the minimum age limit, the F.D.A. also said that Plan B One-Step will be packaged with a product code that prompts the cashier to verify a customer’s age.

The decision applies only to Plan B-One Step, a one dose formulation of the morning-after pill, not the two-dose formulation. This decision lowers the current age restriction on the emergency contraceptive by two years. Additionally, the FDA held that the medicine must be made available on shelves next to other family planning products such as condoms or feminine hygiene products, at thus be available not only in pharmacies, but also in retail stores that have pharmacies on site, even if the pharmacy is closed at the time of purchase.

In announcing the decision, FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. stated in an agency news release that, “research has shown that access to emergency contraceptive products has the potential to further decrease the rate of unintended pregnancies in the United States. The data reviewed by the agency demonstrated that women 15 years of age and older were able to understand how Plan B One-Step works, how to use it properly, and that it does not prevent the transmission of a sexually transmitted disease.”

Additionally, the release cautions that, “because the product will not protect a woman from HIV or AIDS or other sexually-transmitted diseases, it is important that young women who are sexually active remember to see a health care provider for routine checkups. The health care provider should counsel the patient about, and if necessary test her for, sexually-transmitted diseases, discuss effective methods of routine birth control, and answer any other questions the patient may have.”

This new ruling challenges Judge Korman’s decision because it sets a minimum age limit on purchasers. It also challenges the Secretary Sebelius’ decision that the medication should only be available without a prescription to those 17 and older, but after the agency published its decision Tuesday, the New York Times reported that a Health and Human Services Department official said that Ms. Sebelius was comfortable with the FDA’s decision.

This battle is far from over, however. The Center for Reproductive Rights, which filed the lawsuit against Sebelius and the FDA that led to Judge Korman’s ruling in April, is not satisfied with the FDA’s decision.

“The FDA is under a federal court order that makes it crystal clear that emergency contraception must be made available over the counter, without restriction to women of all ages by next Monday,” said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the center. “Lowering the age restriction to 15 for over-the-counter access to Plan B One-Step may reduce delays for some young women – but it does nothing to address the significant  barriers that far too many women of all ages will still find if they arrive at the drugstore without identification or after the pharmacy gates have been closed for the night or weekend.”

“These are daunting and sometimes insurmountable hoops women are forced to jump through in time-sensitive circumstances, and we will continue our battle in court to remove  these arbitrary restrictions on emergency contraception for all women,” she added.

And anti-abortion forces continue to raise questions about the way Plan-B One Step works, calling it a possible abortifacient, despite the fact that the scientific consensus is that the morning-after pill is a contraceptive that prevents pregnancy by interfering with ovulation (which occurs prior to fertilization), not with implantation of a fertilized egg, and will not disrupt an established pregnancy.

Additionally, Dr. Mary Davenport, recent president of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said that her group’s opposition to Plan B is rooted in concerns about casual sexual activity, teen pregnancy and single motherhood.

“Fear of pregnancy is a deterrent to sexual activity,” Dr. Davenport said. “When you introduce something like this, it changes people’s behaviors, and they have more risky sex. Teens will be counting on this morning-after pill to bail them out, and they’ll have more casual encounters.”

The debate over whether easier access to oral contraceptives such as the birth control pill and Plan B-One Step will increase sexual activity in young people and increase the number of cases of sexually transmitted diseases rages on. I believe that over-the-counter medications such as these will reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, and thus, abortions. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – the medical experts in the field of women’s health – is in agreement with me on over-the-counter access to birth control pills. The ACOG has not yet issued at statement on the latest F.D.A. ruling, but it has found that emergency contraception methods are generally safe and effective.

Those who believe that easier access to contraception will lead to an increase in teen sex are closing their eyes to the reality that teens are already having sex. If we have a tool that can help prevent unintended pregnancies – and by extension, abortions – we should use it. Because oral contraceptives such as the birth control pill and Plan B-One Step prevent pregnancy but not sexually transmitted diseases, the safest course for teens and women to choose is an oral contraceptive and a barrier method to prevent both pregnancy and disease transmission. The approval of Plan B-One Step for over-the-counter sale is a step in the right direction of positive, scientifically-informed reproductive health practices.

UPDATE: The Obama administration has decided to challenge the original court ruling that would make Plan B available to all women over the counter regardless of their age.

amy lazenby

Amy Lazenby is a wife, mother of three and small business owner with her husband who splits her time between South Carolina and Georgia. She writes with a liberal world view on most issues, but enjoys exploring where the liberal and libertarian political axes intersect. Follow her on Twitter @Mrs_Laz.

***

Related posts

Business

Palmetto Railways Corruption: CEO Pleads Guilty

Will Folks
Uncategorized

Escaping Your Timeshare Contract Safely & Effectively

FITSForum
Uncategorized

Spy Apps: Balancing Privacy And Practicality

FITSForum

66 comments

lawzoo May 1, 2013 at 2:14 pm

Take two and call me in the morning…..no, wait….

Reply
lawzoo May 1, 2013 at 2:14 pm

Take two and call me in the morning…..no, wait….

Reply
Smirks May 1, 2013 at 2:24 pm

Forget the no prescription part of this (I do agree that emergency contraceptives at least have a legitimate reason to be made available without a prescription or consulting a doctor first, although it is very controversial), I find it a bit troublesome that a parent or guardian is not going to be required for a <16 year old to obtain Plan B. There's very few instances where I would consider it appropriate, most of which involve abusive/neglectful homes or sexual assault by a family member. I think it is a bit questionable for a 12-year-old, for instance, to be able to purchase this and no alarm bells go off.

Reply
Brigid May 1, 2013 at 3:06 pm

That was precisely the arguments made against the activities of the murdered abortion doctor George Tiller. He accepted cash payments and performed abortions on adolescent girls, and did not report to the appropriate state agencies, 164 girls that seem to be known about, but as he died a millionaire there could be many more. Only one case was reported as a child rape.

So if you are committing incest and impregnating your adolescent girl, your secret was safe with Tiller. And herein lies the problem, which the Gosnell case is hopefully publicizing: the pro-choice movement has reflexively defended unethical and in some cases brutal exploitative criminal behaviour, refusing to admit for even one second that some abortionists are not feminist liberationists. There was another example, a Florida abortionist who when confronted on the the overwhelming African American rates of abortion, replied that no one wanted ugly black babies anyway. These men are in it for the money, nothing more. It is a quick and easy way to make a buck, hygiene, the life of the mother, her future reproductive chances, her health, her mental health, and the chance that a pregnant twelve year old could be a sex slave or an incest victim be damned.

Reply
Brigid May 1, 2013 at 4:16 pm

And the down votes proved my point–there can be zero criticism of any abortion provider whatsoever ever ever ever no matter how justified, no matter whether women die on the operating table as in the Gosnell case, as that is perceived by the pro-choice reactionaries as a threat to legal abortion. This is exactly what allowed the Gosnell clinic to operate as it did. If you are truly pro-choice and pro-woman, you will want to aggressively rid scum and opportunists from the ranks of abortion providers. If you truly want first rate health care for women and to protect women and minor women from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse, there can be no place for the likes of Gosnell or Tiller, but I suppose if you support things like the non-resuscitation of a late term aborted baby like the president, then you will read my comments as a threat to the pro-choice norm, when in reality the president’s votes against Born Alive is the real threat to safe legal abortion. And if abortion and contraception is a health care issue rather than a partisan political ideology, then you not like what I am saying.

Reply
Right May 1, 2013 at 7:04 pm

I believe the down votes only prove that some people don’t agree with your comments. Tying Gosnell and Tiller to the Plan B decision is ridiculous. I believe the point in the article above is that making Plan B more available “can help prevent unintended pregnancies – and by extension, abortions.”

In your first comment you said,”So if you are committing incest and impregnating your adolescent girl, your secret was safe with Tiller.” Regardless of whether that’s true, wouldn’t making Plan B available to those adolescent girls actually prevent abortions in the first place, making the Gosnell and Tiller situations irrelevant to this discussion?

Reply
Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 12:24 pm

I believe the down votes provided to Brigid are from feminist apologists whom, by choice and by desire, turn a blind eye to the real world around them in the hopes of pushing a political agenda as opposed to accurately defining real needs. Brigid’s comments are quite spot on and show a critical understanding of the apologists mind.

Right (which you are not), you might consider learning a little more about the real world around you. Young boys and girls are repeatedly harmed in our society. It is unfortunate that they get swept under the rug by people such as ms. lazybee (spelling is accurate) under the guise of ‘women’s rights’.

If these rights the feminists speak of so vehemently were applied to men as well, then I could quite simply shove one of these pills down a woman’s throat under the premise that my reproductive rights are harmed or infringed upon because she got pregnant? Why can’t we do this?

How about another. If reproductive rights as defined by the feminist movement are so good and virtuous then when I find out a woman is pregnant by my sperm, and she is in her third trimester, I should be able to force her to have an abortion because I told her I don’t want kids prior to intercourse. Her agreement is not requisite as these are MY reproductive rights.

Why don’t you look into real human rights before you continue to make yourself look like a fool pushing a political agenda.

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 12:32 pm

“Why can’t we do this?”

Because no one is advocating what you’re talking about.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 12:56 pm

200 years ago no one advocated feminism either. Times change.

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 1:19 pm

Yes, God forbid we treat women as human beings and let them make decisions for themselves. Please, tell me more about how the sky is falling on western civilization because we treat women like humans now instead of chattel. You are ridiculous.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 1:28 pm

If we treated women as humans instead of as you would prefer, they would be required to shoulder 50% of the child support, pay cash for mammograms and obgyn visits, would not be eligible for welfare or other forms of gubmint payments and be arrested for hitting men. I like your idea’s. Lets do that. :)

I decree that all women should be treated as humans. They should have the same rights as all men. Make it so # 1.

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 1:48 pm

Many women already do all of those things. You’re argument is invalid and delusional.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm

When all of them do, just as all men do, then we will have equality. You want equality, right? Equality for all races, genders, orientations, age groups? Everyone, RIGHT?

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 3:12 pm

Sure, because NO men ever shoulder less than 50% of the child support or get their Viagra at reduced cost through insurance or are eligible for welfare and disability. You are incredibly uninformed.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 4:20 pm

Moron

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

shifty henry May 2, 2013 at 10:46 pm

Hmmmmmmm…………

Right May 1, 2013 at 6:59 pm

“refusing to admit for even one second that some abortionists are not feminist liberationists”

Uh, what?

Reply
9" May 2, 2013 at 6:59 pm

How fucking self righteous can you get,bitch? ‘Troublesome’,’appropriate’?

Who the fuck are you ? Ain’t none of your goddamn business,Mr man.

Reply
Smirks May 1, 2013 at 2:24 pm

Forget the no prescription part of this (I do agree that emergency contraceptives at least have a legitimate reason to be made available without a prescription or consulting a doctor first, although it is very controversial), I find it a bit troublesome that a parent or guardian is not going to be required for a <16 year old to obtain Plan B. There's very few instances where I would consider it appropriate, most of which involve abusive/neglectful homes or sexual assault by a family member. I think it is a bit questionable for a 12-year-old, for instance, to be able to purchase this and no alarm bells go off.

Reply
Brigid May 1, 2013 at 3:06 pm

That was precisely the arguments made against the activities of the murdered abortion doctor George Tiller. He accepted cash payments and performed abortions on adolescent girls, and did not report to the appropriate state agencies, 164 girls that seem to be known about, but as he died a millionaire there could be many more. Only one case was reported as a child rape.

So if you are committing incest and impregnating your adolescent girl, your secret was safe with Tiller. And herein lies the problem, which the Gosnell case is hopefully publicizing: the pro-choice movement has reflexively defended unethical and in some cases brutal exploitative criminal behaviour, refusing to admit for even one second that some abortionists are not feminist liberationists. There was another example, a Florida abortionist who when confronted on the the overwhelming African American rates of abortion, replied that no one wanted ugly black babies anyway. These men are in it for the money, nothing more. It is a quick and easy way to make a buck, hygiene, the life of the mother, her future reproductive chances, her health, her mental health, and the chance that a pregnant twelve year old could be a sex slave or an incest victim be damned.

Reply
Brigid May 1, 2013 at 4:16 pm

And the down votes proved my point–there can be zero criticism of any abortion provider whatsoever ever ever ever no matter how justified, no matter whether women die on the operating table as in the Gosnell case, as that is perceived by the pro-choice reactionaries as a threat to legal abortion. This is exactly what allowed the Gosnell clinic to operate as it did. If you are truly pro-choice and pro-woman, you will want to aggressively rid scum and opportunists from the ranks of abortion providers. If you truly want first rate health care for women and to protect women and minor women from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse, there can be no place for the likes of Gosnell or Tiller, but I suppose if you support things like the non-resuscitation of a late term aborted baby like the president, then you will read my comments as a threat to the pro-choice norm, when in reality the president’s votes against Born Alive is the real threat to safe legal abortion. And if abortion and contraception is a health care issue rather than a partisan political ideology, then you not like what I am saying.

Reply
Right May 1, 2013 at 7:04 pm

I believe the down votes only prove that some people don’t agree with your comments. Tying Gosnell and Tiller to the Plan B decision is ridiculous. I believe the point in the article above is that making Plan B more available “can help prevent unintended pregnancies – and by extension, abortions.”

In your first comment you said,”So if you are committing incest and impregnating your adolescent girl, your secret was safe with Tiller.” Regardless of whether that’s true, wouldn’t making Plan B available to those adolescent girls actually prevent abortions in the first place, making the Gosnell and Tiller situations irrelevant to this discussion?

Reply
Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 12:24 pm

I believe the down votes provided to Brigid are from feminist apologists whom, by choice and by desire, turn a blind eye to the real world around them in the hopes of pushing a political agenda as opposed to accurately defining real needs. Brigid’s comments are quite spot on and show a critical understanding of the apologists mind.

Right (which you are not), you might consider learning a little more about the real world around you. Young boys and girls are repeatedly harmed in our society. It is unfortunate that they get swept under the rug by people such as ms. lazybee (spelling is accurate) under the guise of ‘women’s rights’.

If these rights the feminists speak of so vehemently were applied to men as well, then I could quite simply shove one of these pills down a woman’s throat under the premise that my reproductive rights are harmed or infringed upon because she got pregnant? Why can’t we do this?

How about another. If reproductive rights as defined by the feminist movement are so good and virtuous then when I find out a woman is pregnant by my sperm, and she is in her third trimester, I should be able to force her to have an abortion because I told her I don’t want kids prior to intercourse. Her agreement is not requisite as these are MY reproductive rights.

Why don’t you look into real human rights before you continue to make yourself look like a fool pushing a political agenda.

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 12:32 pm

“Why can’t we do this?”

Because no one is advocating what you’re talking about.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 12:56 pm

200 years ago no one advocated feminism either. Times change.

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 1:19 pm

Yes, God forbid we treat women as human beings and let them make decisions for themselves. Please, tell me more about how the sky is falling on western civilization because we treat women like humans now instead of chattel. You are ridiculous.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 1:28 pm

If we treated women as humans instead of as you would prefer, they would be required to shoulder 50% of the child support, pay cash for mammograms and obgyn visits, would not be eligible for welfare or other forms of gubmint payments and be arrested for hitting men. I like your idea’s. Lets do that. :)

I decree that all women should be treated as humans. They should have the same rights as all men. Make it so # 1.

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 1:48 pm

Many women already do all of those things. You’re argument is invalid and delusional.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm

When all of them do, just as all men do, then we will have equality. You want equality, right? Equality for all races, genders, orientations, age groups? Everyone, RIGHT?

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

Sure May 2, 2013 at 3:12 pm

Sure, because NO men ever shoulder less than 50% of the child support or get their Viagra at reduced cost through insurance or are eligible for welfare and disability. You are incredibly uninformed.

Frank Pytel May 2, 2013 at 4:20 pm

Moron

Have a Great Day!! :) There won’t be many left with the Demlicans and Republicrats in charge.

Frank Pytel

shifty henry May 2, 2013 at 10:46 pm

Hmmmmmmm…………

Right May 1, 2013 at 6:59 pm

“refusing to admit for even one second that some abortionists are not feminist liberationists”

Uh, what?

Reply
9" May 2, 2013 at 6:59 pm

How fucking self righteous can you get,bitch? ‘Troublesome’,’appropriate’?

Who the fuck are you ? Ain’t none of your goddamn business,Mr man.

Reply
Wife Beater Extraordinaire May 1, 2013 at 3:18 pm

If the bitches would swallow, none of this would be a problem.

Reply
Me May 1, 2013 at 5:14 pm

I can see both sides. I know that it is not to be used for regular birth control, but I think it will be by many. I think there is a place for it. I just hope and pray that if my daughter or my boys girlfriends get in this situation they will have enough trust in me to come to me first. The morning after pill in all cases may not be the answer. I know it is easier said than done but our youth need to take responsibility for their actions, but I realize that everyone makes mistakes. I hope this does what they hope it does and lowers teenage pregnancy.

Reply
Me May 1, 2013 at 5:15 pm

Didn’t me to post this in regards to the terrible post above me btw.

Reply
Wife Beater Extraordinaire May 1, 2013 at 5:39 pm

You know you want some.

Reply
Wife Beater Extraordinaire May 1, 2013 at 3:18 pm

If the bitches would swallow, none of this would be a problem.

Reply
Me May 1, 2013 at 5:14 pm

I can see both sides. I know that it is not to be used for regular birth control, but I think it will be by many. I think there is a place for it. I just hope and pray that if my daughter or my boys girlfriends get in this situation they will have enough trust in me to come to me first. The morning after pill in all cases may not be the answer. I know it is easier said than done but our youth need to take responsibility for their actions, but I realize that everyone makes mistakes. I hope this does what they hope it does and lowers teenage pregnancy.

Reply
Me May 1, 2013 at 5:15 pm

Didn’t me to post this in regards to the terrible post above me btw.

Reply
Wife Beater Extraordinaire May 1, 2013 at 5:39 pm

You know you want some.

Reply
Brigid May 1, 2013 at 3:33 pm

Access to Plan B may not have a statistically significant impact on the sexual behaviours of youth, but the culture of garbage from the sewer-pipe of hip hop, Bravo, MTV, VH1, certainly does. The hands on knees ass-dance is so cute when a toddler does it, look, lemme put this on youtube, so cute, right? it’s disgusting and ugly and turns precious girls into human porta potties. It robs them of any value other than as a hole. They grow up defined by their genitals, nothing more, and then are shocked when men treat them as nothing more than a hole. So while Plan B may be a quick fix for the sexually active tween, it’s going to take more than pharmaceutical technology to improve young womens lives. in fact, technology and a greater understanding of pregnancy–just the ultra sound alone–has shifted more towards the pro-life side of the spectrum. Will this be aggressively marketed in the black community, as they have double the rate of abortion than whites?

The next big thing: abortion and African Americans, it is a fight them Democrats will not want to have, but it is coming to them sooner rather than later, and the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood will be in the cross-hairs, if I am allowed to use that phrase anymore : http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

Reply
Brigid May 1, 2013 at 3:33 pm

Access to Plan B may not have a statistically significant impact on the sexual behaviours of youth, but the culture of garbage from the sewer-pipe of hip hop, Bravo, MTV, VH1, certainly does. The hands on knees ass-dance is so cute when a toddler does it, look, lemme put this on youtube, so cute, right? it’s disgusting and ugly and turns precious girls into human porta potties. It robs them of any value other than as a hole. They grow up defined by their genitals, nothing more, and then are shocked when men treat them as nothing more than a hole. So while Plan B may be a quick fix for the sexually active tween, it’s going to take more than pharmaceutical technology to improve young womens lives. in fact, technology and a greater understanding of pregnancy–just the ultra sound alone–has shifted more towards the pro-life side of the spectrum. Will this be aggressively marketed in the black community, as they have double the rate of abortion than whites?

The next big thing: abortion and African Americans, it is a fight them Democrats will not want to have, but it is coming to them sooner rather than later, and the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood will be in the cross-hairs, if I am allowed to use that phrase anymore : http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

Reply
Eme Crawford May 1, 2013 at 3:46 pm

Judge Korman put it best: it’s “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable” not to increase access to EC.

Reply
alls fair in love and sex May 1, 2013 at 7:20 pm

Birth control has always rested on the shoulders of women,because they are the one’s suffering through unwanted pregger events…….simple solution to take care of that problem and abortion problem……..every male at the age of fourteen has a mandatory vasectomy. When a couple is ready to bring a child into the world they both go to the doctor to discuss it and then the vasectomy is reversed…..when the woman becomes pregnant he goes back under the knife……Let men carry the load for awhile,no pun intended.

Reply
alls fair in love and sex May 1, 2013 at 7:20 pm

Birth control has always rested on the shoulders of women,because they are the one’s suffering through unwanted pregger events…….simple solution to take care of that problem and abortion problem……..every male at the age of fourteen has a mandatory vasectomy. When a couple is ready to bring a child into the world they both go to the doctor to discuss it and then the vasectomy is reversed…..when the woman becomes pregnant he goes back under the knife……Let men carry the load for awhile,no pun intended.

Reply
9" May 1, 2013 at 7:55 pm

I’m praying for the days described in,The Wanting Seed by Anthony Burgess,when heterosexuality is illegal.You sick perverts with your snot-nosed little children are disgusting.

Reply
Glock May 1, 2013 at 8:26 pm

Funny, I’m praying for the soon-to-be and decisive backlash against you sick bast@rds. Not familiar with the garage read you’re referring to, but seriously, your prayers for illegal heterosexuality will answer my prayers for that decisive backlash.

Reply
Ken the PI May 1, 2013 at 8:53 pm

The funny thing about his comment is that I’m pretty sure he’s an English teacher.

Reply
9" May 1, 2013 at 11:02 pm

When in the garage,I’d suggest reading,’Zen and The Art of Motorcycle Maintenance’.But,please,no more contributions to the gene pool..

Reply
9" May 1, 2013 at 7:55 pm

I’m praying for the days described in,The Wanting Seed by Anthony Burgess,when heterosexuality is illegal.You sick perverts with your snot-nosed little children are disgusting.

Reply
Glock May 1, 2013 at 8:26 pm

Funny, I’m praying for the soon-to-be and decisive backlash against you sick bast@rds. Not familiar with the garage read you’re referring to, but seriously, your prayers for illegal heterosexuality will answer my prayers for that decisive backlash.

Reply
Ken the PI May 1, 2013 at 8:53 pm

The funny thing about his comment is that I’m pretty sure he’s an English teacher.

Reply
9" May 1, 2013 at 11:02 pm

When in the garage,I’d suggest reading,’Zen and The Art of Motorcycle Maintenance’.But,please,no more contributions to the gene pool..

Reply
GrandTango May 1, 2013 at 8:41 pm

Until you ANSWER for Dr. Gosnell, I think you need to be quiet about Birth Control.
That goes for all you liberals.
Birth control becomes more and more accessible, and all you do is whine and demand condoms by the truck-load and easy-pill solutions to the hideous messes you create.
You sit on high, in a big warm yuppie house and pontificate, as the number of slain fetuses increases, single-parent households rise, and children suffer poverty. All because you sit in your ivory tower and preach about what a great deal, ripping poor families apart is (for your haughty wine and cheese party discussions)….
You liberals march in comrade lockstep in the support of more and more abortion…then you cower when your practices turn into brutal murder and the mutilation of tiny babies. You ARE disgusting. . ..make no mistake about that…

Reply
just curious May 1, 2013 at 9:37 pm

How many homeless and unwanted children have have you adopted and given a home?

Reply
GrandTango May 2, 2013 at 8:27 am

Don’t push an ignorant “adoption” demand on me. You are an Abortionist, who supports child-butchering. And I’m calling on you Soulless Liberals to Account for your Monster Butcher Abortionists.

That said: My wife and I have been BLESSED by God with Beautiful, Smart and Healthy children. And I was raised struggling, in poverty, and I am Determined to give my children a much better life, God willing, than I received. Still I thank God for the life my mother allowed me to be granted.

Because of my upbringing, I know that MORALITY is the BEST thing an adult can do for their children. Immorality breaks children…as abortion, irresponsibility, addiction and hatred (liberal tenants) destroys a civil society.

Also: American couples have to go to Russia, Africa, China and South America, to adopt. There are not nearly enough children here to go around. And we’re told that married gay couples want children, and how great that is…We need to quit Killing Children, and let the decent have them to raise. Good people are begging for more children, where the democrat party would rather kill them…

Reply
Sure May 2, 2013 at 11:05 am

I think we all know who the one making ignorant demands is here… Educate yourself and quit moralizing, T.

Reply
GrandTango May 2, 2013 at 11:23 am

You are such a Leftwing Cliche.. Do ANY of you have an original idea, other than the Talking Points from the DNC?
Your logic falls and breaks apart upon inplementation.
Again: We’ve been going more and more liberal for decades, and Abortion murder is at a Hidious level (see Gosnell.) Fatherless children have increased exponentially and society just gets poorer.
You have laddled out lie after lie, and you”ve failed over and over. And all Lizenby is doing here is pounding one more myth for the immoral and clueless.
Failure and Damage to people should carry some Penalty. But because you bully others, and have an Industrial Media Complex behind you, you can destroy families, and then have the Gall (or is it stupidity) to get on here and preach this Ignorance Lizenby is pushing.
You Do not deserve any voice. you”ve lied and cowered. Enough is Enough,. You’re Stupid and Wrong.

9" May 2, 2013 at 6:23 pm

I remember when abortion was illegal,and went w/a teenaged girl to get an illegal one at a motel.Luckily she survived,but was permanently damaged,and died way before her time

Reply
9" May 2, 2013 at 6:23 pm

I remember when abortion was illegal,and went w/a teenaged girl to get an illegal one at a motel.Luckily she survived,but was permanently damaged,and died way before her time

Reply
Michael May 3, 2013 at 8:59 am

Throwing political views out the window; has anyone addressed the health ramifications of this pill used excessively without a doctor’s counseling? This pill is necessary but shouldn’t be available at every whim. Imagine taking 10/week. Sounds ridiculous and some say it won’t happen, but let’s put the other sex hormone on the shelves beside it and see if it is taken “as recommended for safe use” by the FDA.

Reply
Michael May 3, 2013 at 8:59 am

Throwing political views out the window; has anyone addressed the health ramifications of this pill used excessively without a doctor’s counseling? This pill is necessary but shouldn’t be available at every whim. Imagine taking 10/week. Sounds ridiculous and some say it won’t happen, but let’s put the other sex hormone on the shelves beside it and see if it is taken “as recommended for safe use” by the FDA.

Reply

Leave a Comment