Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
***
The facts are clear—though some politicians would rather muddy the waters.
South Carolina isn’t under financial threat from mismanagement or missing money. The real danger comes from a relentless, politically motivated attack on my office—one that risks undermining our state’s financial reputation, increasing taxpayer costs, and stripping voters of their Constitutional right to elect a Treasurer who works for them, not the political elite.
For over a year, certain members of the State Senate have been fixated on a $1.8 billion accounting entry that was part of a larger $3.5 billion reporting mistake made by the former Comptroller General. Instead of focusing on real solutions, they’ve turned this into a headline-grabbing spectacle, calling for resignations and manufacturing a crisis where none exists.
Let’s be clear about what’s really happening: Some senators don’t want you—the voters—to elect your State Treasurer. They want to take that power away from you and appoint someone they can control. They see an opportunity to overturn an election, weaken the independence of the Treasurer’s Office and seize control of the state’s financial management.

***
The problem with their plan is South Carolinians have already spoken. In the last election, 80% of voters chose me to continue leading this office. These citizens understand the importance of having an independent watchdog over the state’s money—someone who answers to them, not political insiders.
Auditors confirmed that the $1.8 billion in question was a bookkeeping mistake that occurred during a computer system conversion years ago. Of that amount, $1.6 billion was appropriations—budgeted dollars, not real cash.
No taxpayer funds were lost. No money disappeared. And at no point did this error affect the Treasurer’s actual bank balances.
These entries weren’t made in secret. The conversion process included representatives from all state financial agencies. My office has been fully transparent and cooperative in addressing the issue. Yet, certain senators continue to falsely point fingers at me and my team of highly qualified bankers, accountants, and investment professionals.
This isn’t accountability—it’s a power grab. If they can’t beat me at the ballot box, they want to change the rules so they can control billions of public dollars for their own special interests.
Just look at the precedent. In 2023, the disclosure of a $3.5 billion accounting mistake in the Comptroller General’s annual report led to resignations and calls for reforms. Back then, the focus was on fixing systemic flaws, not launching personal attacks. But now, with the former Comptroller gone, the attention has shifted toward me, despite overwhelming evidence that my office acted honorably and professionally.
***
RELATED | A SMOKING GUN?
***
This political circus has real consequences. It’s putting South Carolina’s financial future at risk.
The state’s credit rating is the key to low-cost borrowing for schools, roads, and infrastructure. Rating agencies don’t just look at spreadsheets; they assess financial stability and leadership. Every exaggerated headline and baseless claim of “missing money” erodes confidence. If our rating drops, borrowing costs go up, and taxpayers, not the Senate, foot the bill.
Let’s not forget how much taxpayer money has already been wasted on this self-serving witch hunt. How much more will they burn on a problem my office didn’t create?
For 15 years, I’ve fought for stricter financial oversight, better accounting systems, and greater transparency. While I’ve pushed for real reforms, these elected officials have clung to blame and distraction, using taxpayer dollars to fuel their vendetta.
Meanwhile, a federal investigation is underway into the state’s financial reporting, not the Treasurer’s Office, and needs to run its course without this political grandstanding.
I was elected to protect your tax dollars, not play political games. I am committed to fight against this power grab.
South Carolinians deserve leadership, not theatrics. Our financial stability, reputation and future are too important to be sacrificed for political games.
It’s time for the Senate to drop this sideshow and focus on the real work of governing.
Your money is safe. South Carolina is strong. Let’s keep it that way.
***
ABOUT THE AUTHOR…

Curtis Loftis is the elected treasurer of South Carolina.
***
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
5 comments
Peasants: We have found a witch! (A witch! a witch!)
Burn her burn her!
Peasant 1: We have found a witch, may we burn her?
(cheers)
Sir Vladimir: How do you known she is a witch?
P2: She looks like one!
Sir Vladimir: Bring her forward
(advance)
Woman: I’m not a witch! I’m not a witch!
Sir Vladimir: ehh… but you are dressed like one.
W: They dressed me up like this!
All: naah no we didn’t… no.
W: And this isn’t my nose, it’s a false one.
(Sir Vladimir lifts up carrot)
Sir Vladimir: Well?
P1: Well we did do the nose
Sir Vladimir: The nose?
P1: …And the hat, but she is a witch!
(all: yeah, burn her burn her!)
Sir Vladimir: Did you dress her up like this?
P1: No! (no no… no) Yes. (yes yeah) a bit (a bit bit a bit) But she has got a wart!
(P3 points at wart)
Sir Vladimir: What makes you think she is a witch?
P2: Well, she turned me into a newt!
Sir Vladimir: A newt?!
(P2 pause & look around)
P2: I got better.
As usual, perhaps always, Treasurer Loftis is correct! The scary thing is, the Legislators who want our Treasurer appointed (by them) rather than elected (by us) only have to do a little to make it reality. That the average voter is an idiot is not lost on them. All they need to do, is get a referendum question on the ballot that would change how State Treasurers get into office from being elected to being appointed. Word it so a “Yes” vote allows it to happen and it will happen. For some reason I will never understand, SC voters feel a compulsion to vote “Yes” on any referendum question put in front of them. They exhibit no hesitation at all when it comes to surrendering their power and/or their rights if they get to vote “Yes” on some stupid referendum question. Need proof? Remember a few years ago when the voters (but not me) voted to further enhance the power of the almighty political parties by taking away our choice to elect a Governor and Lt Governor from different parties? Why? There was nothing wrong with the system as it was. At least once that I recall, we selected a Governor and Lt Governor from different parties because a majority of us believed that was the best outcome.
Mr Loftis has been a blessing to our state as its treasurer. If he gets tired enough of being dicked around by politicians who don’t have one iota of the honesty and integrity that he has, I hope that Mr Loftis will throw his hat in the ring and run for Governor. He would be head, shoulders, and belt, above the cast of idiots currently offering for that position.
Curtis told the Senate Finance Committee that the money was real and that he’d earned $225 million (or more) investing it. It took $3 million of taxpayer dollars to find out that the State’s financial records had been inflated not by $3.5 billion (that’s billion, with a “b”), but by $5.9 billion. Why do we not know more about the pending SEC investigation?
Try to pay attention.
The auditors solution to the issue is to reverse entries made in 2017. This does not change the bank balance.
Again, this does not change the bank balance. Loftis was correct because he invest all cash (the same balance before the fix as after the fix) and the interest calculation was based on the pool’s daily rate.
It is all in the report, which as a finance professional I have read twice.
The real problem is the Comptroller General’s staff. As the report lays out in detail, the senior staff would fail accounting 101.
It is clear that Senator Larry Grooms is trying to influence a federal investigation. I am not too sure that is a good idea. He may have underestimated the application of federal statutes and their penalties.
Grooms would be fetching in an orange jumpsuit, in that flabby, grandfather sort of way.