Random

To Shave … Or Not To Shave?

THAT’S NOT A QUESTION FOR TAXPAYERS …  Just prior to the Fourth of July holiday, an interesting story appeared on Campus Reform  detailing an extra credit project offered by Arizona State University (ASU) women and gender studies professor Breanne Fahs. Before we get to that, though, the notion of government-subsidized…

THAT’S NOT A QUESTION FOR TAXPAYERS … 

Just prior to the Fourth of July holiday, an interesting story appeared on Campus Reform  detailing an extra credit project offered by Arizona State University (ASU) women and gender studies professor Breanne Fahs.

Before we get to that, though, the notion of government-subsidized “women and gender studies” strikes us as every bit as ridiculous as a government ban on gay marriage – and one of the many reasons we support the elimination of all funding for higher education.

Government should not subsidize discrimination or indoctrination … which we’ve said on repeated occasions as it relates to nonsense like this at government-run schools in our home state of South Carolina.

Anyway, according to Campus Reform  correspondent Lauren Clark (Twitter, here), ASU wants its female students to stop shaving their legs and armpits … at the same time it is encouraging men to shave their bodies.

Oh, and students of both sexes who play along with this gender-bending get extra credit …

Hmmmmm …

Fahs’ web bio describes her “research” as focusing on “women’s subjective accounts of their bodies and sexuality,” as well as “radical feminism” and “social movements and political socialization.”

Great.  Good for her … just don’t make taxpayers subsidize the research and we’re totally cool with whatever razor-based experimentation she wants to conduct.

Related posts

Random

Should You Get A Pet In South Carolina?

FITSForum
Random

Prioleau Alexander: Starting Over

E Prioleau Alexander
Random

Bitcoin: What It Is, How To Invest In It, And The Risks Involved

FITSForum

22 comments

euwe max July 5, 2014 at 1:23 pm

Why can’t taxpayers answer this question?

Reply
Will Folks aka Sic July 5, 2014 at 1:44 pm

really? you are a disgrace to the Joker. please remove your avatar immediately and replace it with something more conformist.

Reply
euwe max July 5, 2014 at 3:15 pm

TO SHAVE … OR NOT TO SHAVE?
THAT’S NOT A QUESTION FOR TAXPAYERS …

Reply
euwe max July 5, 2014 at 1:24 pm

we support the elimination of all funding for higher education.

——-
obviously… sic Willie doesn’t want to feel any more inferior than he already does.

Reply
GrandTango July 5, 2014 at 2:38 pm

FITS’ Pageviews on politics must REALLY be down.
Anyone surprised? I’m not. People recognize dishonesty, and reject it.

Reply
GrandTango July 5, 2014 at 2:52 pm

Just to let everyone know there is an Orgy at Emily’s house tonight. Will, Nikki, the ChocolateMonkey, maybe even Stevie B and his White Hos from Florida and of course your truly. Cum on down and don’t forget your KentuckY Jelly!
PS. Donita Todd won’t be able to make it as she’s too worn out from screwing Ben Hoover and the viewship of WIS-TV.

Reply
GrandTango July 5, 2014 at 2:59 pm

Stick to that level of communication. You’ll likely do much better w/ that than yall are doing trying to sell your political expertise. And it FITS the intelligence level of your readers much better.

Reply
Fish July 5, 2014 at 10:34 pm

Grand tango is emily peterkin. Google her.

Reply
Gary Rice July 6, 2014 at 2:06 pm

Emily Peterkin is another fake name GT uses.

Reply
shifty henry July 6, 2014 at 2:48 pm

From Wiki – peterkin is GT – all the way–

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterkin
============

It’s dawn in the woods. Mother and Father Swan, with their little cygnets, coast across a pond. The Night Watchman of the forest, Mr. Owl, awakens. He looks down at the sleeping PETERKIN, a young boy satyr, and wonders what mischief he will get into today. PETERKIN wakes up, and, prodded by a croaking frog, picks up his flute and starts to play it loudly. When the mother birds in their nests up above tell him to “Be quiet!” and boast about their own well-behaved families (i.e., their eggs), PETERKIN decides to get back at them. He sneaks up the massive “Maternity Tree”, and covertly switches all the eggs in all the nests. Soon, the eggs hatch — each bird couple has a baby bird of a type different from themselves: for example, the canaries hatch a pirate-talking parrot; the tiny English sparrows hatch a huge mockingbird, who quickly begins “mocking” the sparrow father by speaking in an English accent. The father birds, upset and very suspicious of their wives, fly off to “the club” to pout, while the mother birds “go home to mother”. This mass desertion by all the parent birds leave the baby birds hungry, and crying for food and attention. PETERKIN is the only one left to take care of them, a task he gamely tries, but one for which he finds he is totally unsuited. Worn out, an exhausted PETERKIN confesses his shenanigans to the father birds, hoping they will take over their parental duties. However, the father birds are outraged and furious, and chase after a retreating PETERKIN in order to catch and punish him. In the end, all the families are restored to normal, and PETERKIN is sentenced to laundry duty (presumably diapers). But he tells the camera he’d crossed his fingers when he had promised never to do any such mischief ever again. So, not bound by his promise, PETERKIN winks at the camera and says he’ll find something mischievous to do tomorrow.

Reply
Smirks July 5, 2014 at 7:13 pm

Doesn’t stop you from spamming us with your shitty blog, though.

Reply
Self awareness is overated July 5, 2014 at 9:06 pm

You must be immune to hypocrisy.

Reply
Squishy123 July 5, 2014 at 5:22 pm

It’s a form of birth control. You could take the hottest woman on campus, if she raises her arm and you see what looks like GrandTango’s bush under there no amount of alcohol and Viagra will help.

Reply
Buz Martin July 5, 2014 at 5:56 pm

Speak for yourself.

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia July 5, 2014 at 8:01 pm

Oh, you mean her pits are so hairy, it looks like she has Buckwheat in a head lock?

Reply
aikencounty July 6, 2014 at 10:22 am

That should be the phrase of the month!

Reply
Guido Sarducci July 8, 2014 at 5:31 pm

Amen.

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia July 5, 2014 at 8:00 pm

I like women who shave their pits and legs. Hairy beavers are OK. Hey, I am a child of the 70’s. Hairy beavers were the norm, then. If a woman has a hairy beaver and really wants it shaved, I have been accused of having a sharp tongue, FWIW.

Reply
Hair pie delicacy July 5, 2014 at 9:05 pm

If you were born of hairy beaver, then it’s always a homecoming when you get back to it. It’s calling you home.

Reply
Squishy123 July 5, 2014 at 10:43 pm

Hillary Clinton on Line 1.

Reply
CorruptionInColumbia July 6, 2014 at 12:24 am

She has hairy pits, legs, AND ass.

Reply
Philip Branton July 7, 2014 at 10:23 am

Dear Spawar Atlantic…….

“…TO SHAVE … OR NOT TO SHAVE?……THAT’S NOT A QUESTION FOR TAXPAYERS…?

In reality on a field of battle……….it is most certainly a question for taxpayers …!!

What does Wil FOlks leave out of this article? What nuggets of information war fare does he not include..? What indoctrination does this professor foist upon the women and men in her class…?

Naturally….before the invention of “Big Oil Shave Cream” (just look at a shave cream can’s ingredients)……….does this article offer any info on what people might have used to shave with..?

Aloe Vera plants can be grown in very different climates. They are an all natural form of “bio-gel”..!

Why would anyone shave with shave cream that benefits big OIL rather than use Aloe Vera to shave with. Just think….do you ever see a commercial for 100% ALOE gel..? Do you ever see local farmers even grow the plants for local distribution instead of big OIL trucked shave cream..?

How should this info have been used against Wall Street and the Taliban at the same time over a decade ago…?

{Boomerang 101, 404, 901, 909………..CASH in…}

Reply

Leave a Comment