‘Closetocracy’ Documentary Levels Seismic Sexual Allegations Against Lindsey Graham

I do not claim to know Lindsey Graham personally; but I find the facile pretense that every unmarried non-dating male or female must be gay reprehensible and feeble-minded.
I’ll say it at the beginning, middle, and end of this comment and hope it sinks in: celibacy is an ennobling practice which played, and hopefully will continue to play, a crucial role in the advancement of human civilization and protects it from the ruins of extreme promiscuity.
And extreme promiscuity IS ruinous on both the personal and societal levels. And I think there can be no personal pleasure or fun in it.
The author of Ecclesiastes 2, the author says he tested himself with every kind of pleasure, wealth, and possession—including acquiring male/female slaves, singers, and “many concubines”—only to conclude that it was all “vanity and a chasing after the wind.” He concludes the Book with man should be content with the one wife God gave him.
And Song of Solomon 6:8 lists “60 queens, 80 concubines, and an uncounted number of young maidens” yet returns to the ONE perfect beloved.
These Books lasted thousands of years and shall, God willing, last as long as humanity does. Why? Because they speak of eternal truths about human nature.
Celibacy is known in Nature in the lone wolf which wanders away from its pack of males and females.
And monogamy is known among species on various rungs of the animal kingdom.
I also find this story feeble-minded and proof of how far supposed journalism degenerated out of common sense. So, a male sex worker was so hyper-masculine as to “top Linsey Graham down” then so feminine as to transition to a woman? Try to sell me another story!
And those other “men” found it safe to claim Lindsey Graham “alternated” so their stories do not clash between Lindsey Graham being a “donor” or a “receptor” as I am politely putting it.
A most-informative piece about Lindsey Graham’s character is his decades-ago interview in which he tells that his father had to make up and tell jokes to keep mill workers returning to his saloon to drink after their shifts. Experiences like that get ingrained in a child and he grows up wanting to please everyone. THAT IS ALL. No gayness or bisexuality or rubbish. In a hot-mic moment, Graham was caught asking then-former Senator and Secretary of State-candidate John Kelly how Graham could help Kelly’s confirmation. No traitor to his party, no secret Democrat masquerading as Republican, no rubbish. Just a childhood-ingrained compulsion to please every one around. So, if “gay” Lindsey Graham was, it was only in the original meaning of the word: the opposite of morose.
So, I end with the same thought with which I began: celibacy is an ennobling practice which played, and hopefully will continue to play, a crucial role in the advancement of human civilization and protects it from the ruins of extreme promiscuity.

Please also note my replies to comments on your Week-in-Review:
? @RayneLainey , perhaps “the media outlets willing to print it” are no worth reading and that is why they were not, and perhaps should not be, taken seriously.
When allegations of paying for under-age sex are made AND HAVE SOME SUPPORT they result in either criminal charges OR resignation of the official involved, even when a Republican in a majority-Republican Congress.
Two examples come to mind: Former, and now-late House Speaker Dennis Hastert and, more recently, Former Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz, who was reportedly a pick for U.S. Attorney General before Pam Bondi.
Lindsey Graham was never bigger than either of those and would have suffered the same fate had the allegations of payments for under-age sex had any validity.

Okay, enough about sex! Let’s talk violence instead.
God willing and FITS permitting, I bring attention to two important events in the past month to show that the instincts of a majority of U.S. political candidates and politicians, and of a substantial segment of U.S. lawyers and judges, are shockingly similar to those of Islamist violence-promoters in that they simple-mindedly identify a population, give it a derogatory name, ascribe to it all the problems the politicians/lawyers/violence-promoters, and propose “purifying” the land of that population as the solution to everything.
For the Islamist violence-promoters, that population in Israel and the Middle East Christians.
For U.S. politicians, that population is immigrants.
And for U.S. lawyers and judges, that population is pro se litigants.
In the debate between Darline and Ralph, the latter actually said that the secret to saving Medicare is deporting “illegals.”
Next, some of those “conservatives” will tell us that they discovered the long-sought cure to cancer to be deportations.
So, Darline is not informed on Taiwan. But is Annie informed on the Middle East?
On 30 September 2026, on a Fly-Dubai flight from Dubai to Ben Gurion Airport, a “self-radicalized” co-pilot pretended to want to perform one of the five Moslem daily prayers in the cockpit cabin. The Hindu captain, Smit Machchhar allowed it and respectfully did not look behind himself at the “praying” co-pilot, Hammam al Hammami. Rather than pray, Hammam loosened the cockpit crash axe and began striking Captain Smit in the back of the head with it in order to kill him, take over the plane and crash it into the highest building in Tel Aviv 9/11 style.
Thank God, miraculously, the gravely wounded Smit, fortifying himself with Hindu prayers, managed to open the cockpit cabin door from the inside and scream for help before losing consciousness. The deadheading pilots rushed in, stabilized the plane from the catastrophic descent in which Hammam had put it before being restrained by other passengers, and managed to land it without a single fatality in Tabuk Airport, Saudi Arabia, instead.
Then on Friday, 23 October 2026, three armed men invaded a Christian Orthodox church of Al Karak Governorate in Jordan in the middle of funeral rites for an elderly female and sprayed bullets all around, killing nine and wounding forty innocent worshippers.
What were Hammami and the three Jordanians trying to achieve?
Did they delude themselves that 12 million Israelis with just get up and leave for no return the only home they ever knew, the home they built over years of real blood, sweat, and tears, and throw themselves into the sea?
Did they delude themselves that Jordan 250,000 Christians, Syria’s remaining Syrianites, Malachites and Chaldeans, Lebanon’s 5 million Maronites, AND Egypt’s 30 Million Coptic Christians will similarly march to the sea, drown themselves, and leave “the Land of Islam” purified of the “kafirs” who, according to the Islamist violence-promoters, worship three gods and eat one of those three every Sunday in communion?
Believe it or not, the answers are more likely than not yes and yes.
Or even short of mass self-deportation or self-immolation of 50 million “kafirs,” killing a few and making the others miserable is an achievement.
Notice how the number of Israel’s population, which BTW includes Arabs, Ethiopians, and Mizrahi Jews, approximates the imaginary number of “illegals” who, according to “conservatives” eat white Americans’ pets and steal African Americans’ jobs and women?
Notice also how the grievance of unrepresented litigants are automatically dismissed, regardless of their merits, by U.S. judges of all genders, races, faiths, and political leanings, in the hope that the unrepresented will stop suing?
Why did no one ask any U.S. Senate candidate, or sitting U.S. Senator, from South Carolina if they worry about the future of Middle Eastern Christians? Do they even know that Christians exist outside the U.S.?
My answer is that the politicians are content to make the opponent suffer verbal blows.
But violence, verbal or physical, never solved anything.
Do these middle-aged blondes have other answers? Do they even know those problems exist?