Image default

South Carolina Senate Allocates Funds To Reproductive Health Care

“Less unwanted pregnancies equals less abortions …”

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Yesterday, the South Carolina Senate adopted a budget amendment directing the S.C. Department of Health and Human Services (SCDHHS) to allocate up to $7,500,000 toward reproductive healthcare for individuals already availing themselves of the state’s social safety net programs.

Senator Tom Davis’ amendment was unanimously adopted in the midst of protracted battle between legislators in both chambers with different views on how the Palmetto State should handle abortion.

Davis tweeted “Less unwanted pregnancies = less abortions” as he touted his amendment on Tuesday afternoon.

Davis told me the amendment is “about empowering women, especially those who are economically disadvantaged.” According to a 2016 Brookings Institution report, “low-income women are more than five times as likely than affluent women to experience an unintended pregnancy.”

“Multiple peer-reviewed studies conclusively show that access to birth control at an earlier age improves economic outcomes for women, such as increases in educational attainment and labor force participation,” Davis said before lamenting the reality that “too many women in our state are missing out on this opportunity.”

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data related to South Carolina’s elevated teen birth rate would certainly seem to suggest Davis’ concerns are valid.

(Click to View)

Teen birth rates (CDC)

Lawmakers are in the midst of debating a proposed $36.6 billion spending plan for the coming fiscal year – which begins on July 1, 2023.

Once Senators approve their version of the budget, House members will review changes made by the upper chamber before deciding whether to concur with those amendments. Any lingering disagreements between the two chambers would be hammered out by a conference committee – a six-member panel which negotiates a final spending plan for approval by both the House and Senate.

After that, the spending plan would land on the desk of governor Henry McMaster – who has typically refrained from materially changing budgets via his veto pen.

Count on this news outlet to keep readers up to speed on the status of this amendment – and the broader abortion debate – within the state budget.



(Via: Travis Bell)

Dylan Nolan is the director of special projects at FITSNews. He graduated from the Darla Moore school of business in 2021 with an accounting degree. Got a tip or story idea for Dylan? Email him here. You can also engage him socially @DNolan2000.



Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to proactively address? We have an open microphone policy here at FITSNews! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.


Get our newsletter by clicking here …


Related posts


Lowcountry Government Drama: Federal Lawsuit Filed

Will Folks

Missing Macaque Captured

Will Folks

Missing Macaque Wanders Walterboro

Will Folks


Eowyn Baughman Top fan April 19, 2023 at 9:39 pm

Birth control also has a 7:1 return on investment for women who would qualify for Medicaid for a pregnancy & birth. An IUD is so much cheaper than even an uncomplicated birth; orders of magnitude cheaper than a NICU stay.

RC April 20, 2023 at 8:43 am

“Count on this news outlet to keep readers up to speed on the status of this amendment – and the broader abortion debate”

Why did you never report on the “freedom caucus” wanting the death penalty for women who receive abortions?


Leave a Comment