SHARE

SENATOR MUST NEVER BE ALLOWED TO SERVE ON HIGH COURT … 

Suppose a “Republican” wins the White House in 2016. Big deal, right? Let’s not forget the last “Republican” president nearly doubled the national debt, expanded entitlement spending and put ideological sellout John Roberts on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Oh, he also created a domestic spy network as part of America’s “War on Terror” – a war we’re losing, by the way.

Seriously, what was the point of electing a “Republican” president again? We’re not sure …

There was clearly no point to electing a “Republican-controlled” U.S. House of Representatives, either …

Anyway …

Assuming a “Republican” does win the White House in 2016, there’s a chance they would get to appoint a couple of U.S. Supreme Court justices. And according to an article in The New Yorker, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham is in the mix for one of those nominations.

Sure, you have to scroll all the way down to the bottom of the article to see his name … but he’s in there.

Hopefully the speculation surrounding Graham will remain just that … speculation. After all, he is one of the arch defenders of the government’s expansive spy web – meaning were he to sit on the U.S. Supreme Court we might as well erase the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

America’s high court was created to serve as a check against the abuses and excess of the other two branches of government – not serve as a rubber stamp for them. Our founding fathers viewed it as a mechanism to protect life and liberty – not to facilitate their ongoing erosion.

Graham – and any public official who openly praises the usurpation of our most fundamental rights – must never be permitted to sit in a position of judgment over those rights.

Obviously those are just our opinions. What do you think? Vote in our poll and post your thoughts in our comments section below …