SC Lawmakers Jockey Over Reform Agenda

2011 reform agenda

By FITSNews || Will 2011 be the year that several common sense, long-overdue reforms finally become law in South Carolina?

That’s what a handful of fiscal conservatives in the S.C. General Assembly are hoping … and they’re crafting ambitious legislative agendas with the aim of seizing the moment and riding a wave of voter outrage against the failed tax-and-spend policies of the past.

Well, and the present.

In the Senate, the effort to craft a comprehensive reform agenda is being led by Tom Davis (R-Beaufort).  Meanwhile in the S.C. House of Representatives, Rep. Tracy Edge (R-Myrtle Beach) has reportedly been fashioning a broad reform agenda of his own.  Other fiscally-conservative lawmakers are also working on specific policy initiatives in the hopes that a rising tide of Tea Party activism and the anticipated election of Nikki Haley in November will bring about a shift in the state’s governing direction.

But are those hopes well-founded?

Previous legislative reform agendas have failed miserably, running into a brick wall of opposition from key “Republican” legislative leaders like Senate Finance Chairman Hugh Leatherman, House Speaker Bobby Harrell, Senate President Glenn McConnell and House Ways and Means Chairman Danny Cooper.  Along with “GOP” Majority Leaders Harvey Peeler (Senate) and Kenny Bingham (House), this cabal of RINOcrat leaders wields absolute power over state government and has spent the last eight years successfully blocking every major reform proposal.

“(The reformers) have some momentum,” one longtime State House observer tells FITS. “But they control none of the machinery of power, and (they) are constantly fighting amongst themselves.”

For example, while the climate may be ripe for certain reforms, any proposal substantially diminishing the power of the legislative branch (or threatening the ability of its current crop of leaders to govern as they see fit) is unlikely to pass, the observer noted.

Which leaves us where, exactly …

And while some are viewing Gov. Mark Sanford’s recent “success” at sustaining budget vetoes as a sign that the legislature is moving in a more fiscally-responsible direction, insiders know full well that Sanford got those results by cutting a deal.  Less than a week after his “veto victory,” Sanford signed “the Kremlinator,” a command economic manifesto pushed by Speaker Harrell that dramatically expands government’s role in the state’s economic development efforts.

Quid pro quo, anyone?

More importantly (as we’ve noted), Sanford’s vetoes didn’t “save” the taxpayers one red cent – they simply freed up money that will be spent during the next budget year.  Fortunately, one part of the “reform agenda” being pushed by Davis is the creation of a “taxpayer rebate fund” that would make sure future “savings” actually made their way back to the people who pay for government in the first place.

Now … could a reform like that pass in 2011?

“Ask Leatherman and Cooper,” our insider joked.

In other words … hell no.

In addition to the fact that reformers are still on the outside looking in when it comes to holding power (and thus getting anything passed), there continues to be a glaring lack of unity within the reform movement – fissures which weaken it both politically and ideologically.

For example, previous “reform agendas” ignored the pressing need for school district consolidation in South Carolina because Republicans in Spartanburg County (where voters oppose consolidation) threatened to withhold their support if the measure was incorporated.  Similar policy rifts on other issues have likewise prevented consensus – a nod to the legislatively-driven regionalism that holds South Carolina back on so many fronts.

Also, multiple lawmakers tell FITS that Haley’s gubernatorial campaign – which has yet to lay out a comprehensive policy agenda of its own – doesn’t want individual legislators getting ahead of her on the policy front while she negotiates with legislative leaders.

Bottom line?  While Leatherman and Harrell have proven adept at keeping their RINOcrat troops in line, reformers have consistently been unable to rally their troops around a comprehensive agenda.  Hopefully that will change in 2011 … but based on the way things are shaping up we’re not going to hold our breath.

Follow FITSNews on Twitter and like us on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

  1. By yarrrr July 19, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    “Quid pro quo, anyone?”

    Maybe… but quid pro quo probably had nothing to do with the vetos… and Haley and Ballentine also voted for the “the Kremlinator”… the only ones who voted against it were a few Democrats…

    Reply

  2. By colleen July 19, 2010 at 12:44 pm

    Will, what about all those trips to Florida that the Governor took recently? There were 5 days in May, six days in June, 3 days in June and one day in July. Why the need for security and the secrecy. The info came from one of the Florida newspapers.

    Reply

  3. By Fred July 19, 2010 at 12:52 pm

    Legislators getting ahead of her???

    She needs to worry about Vincent Sheheen, NOT ‘individual Legislators’.

    Here is Sheheen’s reform bills that he primary sponsored:

    S 0128 – Would add the Department of Administration (abolishing parts of the B&CB)

    S 0129 – Would change who is elected to Statewide office and make some of the non-political jobs non-partisan

    S 0138 – Creates the office of Inspector General – idea endorsed by FITS.

    I find it ironic that once Nicki realized that Sheheen is partnering with other reform-minded legislators, all of a sudden she wants on the boat of reform.

    Republican legislators: considering supporting Sheheen: She did not want you before, but now she does: http://www.thestate.com/2010/07/09/1371304/haley-huddling-with-wary-sc-republican.html

    SC Business. Didn’t want you or the Chamber until they picked Sheheen. Now she does: http://www.thestate.com/2010/07/18/1381533/haley-goes-after-business.html

    Sorry for the rant. I’m getting a little sick of the reactive knee-jerk Nicki Haley.

    Fred

    Reply

  4. By Fred July 19, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    BTW, this is what FITS said about Nicki Haley’s chances for Governor on March, 2006.

    “What Haley needs now is a hook that will take her to the next level, a bold proposal of Quinn-Sheheen proportions that will give her a seat at the table during this election cycle and a basis for running in 2010. If she gets it, watch out”

    Is it not ironic that fiscal conservatives and governmental reformists are STILL waiting on Haley to get this message?

    Come on Nicki! Get with the plan!

    Fred

    Reply

  5. By Harry July 19, 2010 at 1:26 pm

    The action will be at the Budget and Control Board. Watch Curtis Loftis.

    Reply

  6. By ceilidh10 July 19, 2010 at 1:38 pm

    ….has yet to lay forth her policy agenda?? when?? Holy cow, the people deserve to know who and what she is so they can compare her to Sheheen. Methinks the woman of color from India has a lot of hubris and ego she ain’t earned the right to have yet…

    Said the Pieman to Simple Simon…show me first your penny….

    Reply

  7. By eggaday July 20, 2010 at 8:20 am

    we don’t need reform. we need to have our current law respected.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

*