SC Senate Poised To Expand Cigarette Tax Hike

cigarette tax

By FITSNews || Because it wouldn’t be South Carolina’s “Republican-controlled” General Assembly without one chamber trying to “out-tax” the other, the S.C. Senate is looking to expand on the thirty cent per pack tax hike that passed the S.C. House of Representatives on an anonymous voice vote earlier this month.

In addition to contemplating a tax hike of fifty cents per pack (twenty cents higher than the House increase) – the Senate is also looking to strip the money generated by the tax hike from the state’s general fund and instead put it into a dedicated “trust fund” that would go toward funding annual Medicaid premium increases.  These already unsustainable premium increases are expected to soar even higher under “Obamacare,” meaning that any revenue generated by a cigarette tax hike will likely be completely absorbed within a few short years – particularly if the tax increase has the expected effect of reducing consumption.

So to recap, lawmakers are proposing to raise a tax on a declining revenue source that will be completely eaten up within a decade by the rising cost socialized medicine.

Yup.

Not at all surprisingly, neither the House nor Senate versions of the cigarette tax hike include any substantive reform – they’re just pouring money down the same drain expecting a different result.  Neither proposal restructures the state’s health care agencies, reforms Medicaid eligibility, implements new fraud protections or – and this is critical – offsets the tax hike with a corresponding tax cut elsewhere in the budget.

Why does that matter?

Well, according to the S.C. Association of Taxpayers, thirteen Senators (ten “Republicans” and three Democrats) have signed a “No New Taxes” pledge that prohibits them from voting in favor of a tax hike that isn’t accompanied by a corresponding decrease.

They are:

Senator Kevin Bryant (S-3 Anderson)
Senator Mike Fair (S-6 Greenville)
Senator David Thomas (S-8 Greenville)
Senator Danny Verdin (S-9 Laurens)
Senator Shane Martin (S-13 Spartanburg)
Senator Harvey Peeler (S-14 Cherokee)-Senate Majority Leader
Senator John Courson (S-20 Richland)
Senator Jake Knotts (S-23 Lexington)
Senator Greg Ryberg (S-24 Aiken)
Senator Nikki Setzler (S-26 Lexington)
Senator Dick Elliott (S-28 Horry)
Senator John Yancey McGill (S-32 Williamsburg, Florence, Georgetown and Horry)
Senator Larry Grooms (S-37 Berkley)

Obviously, we can count another dozen or more lawmakers who campaigned against tax hikes in their 2008 elections.

Make no mistake, FITS will be watching the Senate vote on this issue very closely to see which lawmakers violate their pledge – and which ones renege on their campaign promises.

It’s a “gut-check” vote for the GOP, in other words.

House members voted anonymously for the budget section that included the tax hike, but you can see how each House member voted on an amendment that would have removed the cigarette tax increase by clicking here.

South Carolina spends billions of dollars each year (nearly a third of its $21.1 billion budget) on its fragmented, inefficient health care delivery system.  And with Medicaid services covering approximately 25 percent of the state’s population, you can see how that sort of waste quickly adds up.  Also, the cost of serving this program is also constantly increasing, with last year’s Medicaid growth rate (which occurred during the worst recession in eight decades, mind you) clocking in at around 8 percent.

Despite these massive funding increases, the Palmetto state continues to rate poorly when it comes to the health of its citizens.  According to a recent report by the Trust for America’s Health, South Carolina ranks fifth in the nation in obesity, eighth in diabetes and seventh in infant mortality – despite ranking nineteenth in the nation in per capita health care funding.

Pretty pathetic …

Follow FITSNews on Twitter and like us on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

  1. By Liberty For Me March 30, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    I am all for a cigarette tax hike as long as the marijuana tax is only 5%

    Reply

  2. By Ralph V. March 30, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    Increase the cigarette tax!

    It is harmful to our health, expensive, obnoxious, and a good source of revenue that harms only those who can afford it.

    Cigarettes, like liquor, is a luxury.

    Tax it!!

    Reply

  3. By Ynotfirst March 30, 2010 at 8:08 pm

    tax alcohol and make lots more money

    Reply

  4. By Recovering Lobbyist March 30, 2010 at 8:29 pm

    In a rare concession to Governor Sanford, I agree with him on this issue–raise the cigarette tax and lower another tax. The income tax would be a good choice. Make that a part of the package, and the no tax pledge legislators can defend their vote. Otherwise, a tax increase is a tax increase.

    Reply

  5. By No Way! March 30, 2010 at 8:43 pm

    MUSC wants a cigarette tax really bad!

    A message from the MUSC Senate President:

    The proposal to increase the cigarette tax by 50 cents a pack is scheduled for vote in the SC Senate next week. Now is the time to contact your elected representatives to urge them to pass the legislation. Information on the senators and their e-mail addresses can be found at:

    http://www.scstatehouse.gov/html-pages/senateemail.html (email link)

    http://www.scstatehouse.gov/html-pages/senatemembers.html (Senate member info)

    Apparently, there are several key senators who are not yet committed and may, therefore, warrant special consideration. These individuals include Senators McConnell, Courson, Rose, Grooms, Setzler, and Cromer.

    Please do not delay!
    Thank you

    Chris Davies

    President, MUSC Faculty Senate

    Reply

  6. By Chesterfield County Native March 30, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    I DO NOT WANT ANY MORE TAXES ON ANYTHING.

    Reply

  7. By Johnny March 30, 2010 at 10:14 pm

    I wish marijuana was legal :(

    Reply

  8. By madcock March 30, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    Imagine cigarette smokers actually having to pay for some of the enormous extra expense they cost taxpayers!

    I remember a day when they claimed to stand for personal responsiblity. Of course they also used to claim they stood for lower deficits, no nation building for our armed forces, and less government intusion.

    And then came Ronald Reagan and Dubya Bush.

    Reply

  9. By Reality March 31, 2010 at 10:25 am

    Increase the cigarette tax! This is a common sense vote. Don’t put special interest groups first by signing a tax pledge. It is due time to move forward with a reasonable increase and put this issue to rest.

    Reply

  10. By The Guy March 31, 2010 at 10:30 am

    31 Mar 2010
    Well, you know, raise the butt (that’s cigarette) tax to $3.00 like Rhode Island. Maybe two bennies: some bucks for good causes and, in time, get folks offa dem dam butts and help health!

    Reply

  11. By sclawyerIII March 31, 2010 at 10:34 am

    large amounts of medical care is the effect of obesity, heavy drinking, and smoking.

    Addressing the root problem might lower medical costs, but you can’t expect doctors treating people with diabetes, hypertension, and all of the other problems to make them go away.

    They’re treating results and telling people to eat better and lose weight, but they can hardly make them do it.

    Reply

  12. By Frank Lee April 1, 2010 at 1:11 am

    I’m guessing the writer of the article is a smoker. Maybe the new tax will help him quit!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

*