Leighton Lord: “It Was An Asian Gang Or Something”
By FITSNews || Columbia lawyer Leighton Lord is the first S.C. Attorney General candidate to cut a television commercial – an introductory spot that seeks to establish his credentials as a crime fighter who will crack down on corruption (which there’s plenty of in this state).
In our opinion, it’s a little early for TV commercials in a down ballot race, but Lord’s team has put together a slick, well-produced spot – and Lord gets credit for delivering his message personally (i.e. face to camera), something voters like.
There’s just one on-screen reference from Lord’s ad that we found funny:
Leighton Lord zeroes in on Asian organized crime.
Wait … Asian? Is somebody cooking?
Seriously, people … South Carolina’s Asian population is 1.2 percent. Do we have an Asian gang problem that no one has told us about?
Anyway, the reference reminded us of the infamous Sam Sweet 9-1-1 call from the movie Cable Guy … specifically the “I think it was an Asian gang or something” clip.
Enjoy …
Lord is one of three candidates running to replace current S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster, who is running for governor.
Also in the race are former prosecutor Robert Bolchoz and Alan Wilson, son of U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson.
WEB EXTRA
Leighton Lord Ad






Comments
By Asian Gang King-Pin on March 11th, 2010 at 8:20 am
Our population maybe be small but our power is big. Bigger than we thought.
By oh My on March 11th, 2010 at 8:27 am
Sic, I saw the ad and it talked about Lord fighting organized crime like Asian crime when he worked for the US Senate. If you don’t think gangs, illegal aliens, and organized crime is a problem here in South Carolina, you’ve got another thing coming.
By Magic Marker on March 11th, 2010 at 8:42 am
1) Hilarious picture Sic.
2) Sharp ad by the Lord campaign.
3) Seems to me that fighting any organized crime (Asian, Italian, Filipino or Russian) is probably a good thing for Lord to tout.
4) Overall a good sketch of Lord’s biography of private sector experience and government service in some capacity. All 3 candidates have government service on their resumes, but Lord has the advantage of having managed a highly successful law firm. You don’t make managing partner by being just a nice guy or the best attorney; you have to be both and be a leader.
5) Not to miss the forest from the trees, but Lord is on TV. His opponents are not. That implies Lord is raising good money this quarter, and buying TV for a race like Attorney General is necessary to winning. You can win something like Secretary of State or Comptroller General without TV, but people look at the top law enforcement official differently than the other down-ballot races.
By J. Riley on March 11th, 2010 at 9:38 am
At least he passed the bar. Alan Wilson didn’t. No Columbia political insider can forget the afternoon that his (former tv news star) wife frantically emailed friends, family, and politicos to say “the party’s off” after finding out there was no need to have a “congrats, Alan, you passed the bar” party after he didn’t. Have we ever had an Attorney General who had trouble passing the bar?
By Dylan Sanders on March 11th, 2010 at 9:39 am
I really think you are underestimating the gang problem in South Carolina. Asian gangs are a lot different than the other gangs they are into more high tech crimes i.e. identity theft and other crimes that don’t require huge numbers of people. Crime is a serious issue and we need someone from day one that has experience in dealing with gangs. Leighton Lord is currently all over the state raising money and he currently leads the AG Money race. The fact that Leighton Lord has raised more money than his opponents tells me I’m not the only person who thinks he will make a great Attorney General.
By Jeremy Walker on March 11th, 2010 at 9:58 am
Hmm, I’m a big fan of Fits News but this article is pretty dumb. The title [Leighton Lord: “It Was An Asian Gang Or Something”] is misleading because he didn’t say that. And the commercial ‘Leighton zeros in on Asian organized crime’ is just the title of a magazine article Lord was featured in, what, ten years ago when he was in D.C.?
I know Fits News doesn’t claim to be fair, and that’s why I think it’s funny, I guess this gets to me because this is a candidate I really like. He’s way more qualified than the other two guys, and is that true about Wilson not even passing the bar???
By fitsnews on March 11th, 2010 at 10:16 am
People, people … simmer down. We like Leighton Lord just fine and are having a little fun at his expense.
Seriously, some of you really, really need to get out more.
-FITS
P.S. – Leslie Mann in Cable Guy? Swoon!
By D.G. on March 11th, 2010 at 10:18 am
J. Riley,
I wanted to respond to your post about Alan. I am a close friend to Alan and his wife, Jennifer. They are both very kind people.
Your post is a downright lie. What you say about Jennifer “frantically e-mailing” never happened. I would have remembered that. What you wrote is not true.
And, Alan -did- pass the bar. If he didn’t, how has he been a successful prosecutor for the last 8 years?
I respect FITS News and other blogs as opportunities to make comments that serve as constructive discussion, but please be discerning about what you write.
By No Name on March 11th, 2010 at 11:05 am
Lost to many newcomers and the casual or professional lurker to FITS is the willingness to offer and many times use the site for ejudication of claims and smears.
On the Alan Wilson “cut” …….I would not mind seeing the substantiation by having someone post the scores for that try….got to believe that someone can pull that off.
After we see or don’t see that then we can see if anyone can reproduce the email.
But yea I would like to see if he failed the Bar exam the first time.
By JD on March 11th, 2010 at 11:53 am
Jeremy W says Lord is “way more qualified than the other two guys.” How many times has Lord himself prosecuted criminals? How many criminals has he personally put behind bars? You might want to take a look at that. I think the answer to both of those questions is zero.
By JWS on March 11th, 2010 at 12:00 pm
He went “eyeball-to-eyeball with Peter Chong–the John Gotti of Asian organized crime.”
By Craig on March 11th, 2010 at 12:15 pm
If you think that ad was well produced, then it is clear you haven’t seen much well produced advertising.
By Domo Arigato Mr Roboto on March 11th, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Fighting terrorism in DC? The one and only incident I can think of was over and done before most people could blink.
By SCLegaleagle on March 11th, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Article speaks for itself and simply shows that the entire breadth of Leighton Lord’s crime fighting applies to about 1% of the SC population. he was a staff officer to the minority counsel of a minor Senate committee. That is evidence of having rich parents to get hm a job in DC, not being a crime fighter.
He has never tried a criminal case…..anywhere. He is a real estate atorney for big companies, which says a lot about his “experience.”
By the way, Wilson is a member of the bar (check their information) which proves he passed the bar, and he was single when he took it, so he had no wife to send out e-mails.
If raising money is the only qualification for being a constitutional officer, Mark Sanford would be the most qualified personinthe state for any office, which is scary in itself. Speakingof which, Lord is another big money, yankee educated, blue blood candidate that has decided after a lifetime of sitting on the bench that he wants to be a public servant. At least Bolchoz and Wilson have a history in SC and of public service.
By My Name Efang on March 11th, 2010 at 12:43 pm
This ad was not well produced. Looked like one of those creepy Lawyer ads that airs late at night. I thought Bill Green was about to pop out of the curtain behind him.
By Sic's the Man on March 11th, 2010 at 1:41 pm
I have an idea, Sic, according to my lawyer friends, we can clear all this bar failing stuff up. If each candidate will agree to wave confidentially on bar results then we can get right to the truth about who did and did not pass the bar.
They say getting more than one politician to agree to something is like herding cats. But, we’ve seen you do things better than this before. If you ask them all to wave and agree to post results, you might be the only guy that can get this done.
And for those of your that are not familiar with cat herding:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_MaJDK3VNE
By Caty on March 11th, 2010 at 4:27 pm
Leighton Lord has said he wants to eliminate the Prosecution Section of the Attorney General’s Office. Further, he said SC doesn’t need a 17th Circuit Solicitor’s Office. The SC Constitution clearly states the Attorney General is the Chief Prosecutor of the state. Guess he doesn’t read the Constitution much or think it’s important. I guess he also doesn’t realize that ICAC–internet crimes against children–is a part of the Prosecution Section. Ya know, Datelin is doing a great job of catching predators–we don’t need to waste time and energy on it. Inusrance Fraud is part of Prosecution, but it’s a bad economy, so who cares if two people stage an accident to get a quick check from their insurance company? State Grand Jury is a part of the Prosecution section, too, but I guess it isn’t important either.
Bolchoz wants a “death couch.” He doesn’t want a middle/ drug court. In his words, “Crack mama’s don’t need help, they need jail.” I’m sure Ozmint is clearing out some space right now at the prison for the crack mamas. He makes men wear black or brown socks to work, and although that’s not too big a deal, men’sd ress shirts have to be blue or white. Men can’t have facial hair. Women have to wear pantyhose. I guess he’s going to allot a clothing allowance at the AG’s office for his new rules? Most state employees can’t afford to buy new clothes.
Alan did fail the bar on the first attempt, but he passed it on the second. A lot of very intelligent people (the valedictorian of Boston College no less) fail the bar on their first attempt. Three days of grueling testing is tough. A car wreck, bad family news or any other stressful event could cause you to have a bad day and thus fail the bar. While Bochoz did work at the AG’s office as a Deputy, Alan is the only one who worked there as a prosecutor. He was shoulder to shoulder with the other employees in the office. He has a unique understanding of the transformations that need to occur in that office. He isn’t someone standing from a higher ground looking down, but he is someone who has worked the trenches.
By Motoring Man on March 11th, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Duh! He is talking about all the runaway Toyotas..he can farm the lawsuits out to his “contributors”…the more things change…
By AI on March 11th, 2010 at 5:38 pm
I had come here to post about Alan Wilson, but Caty’s post says it all. Having passed two bar exams, I can tell you how brutal they are and know that in both states, there will very intelligent people who had a bad day and failed.
As for Leighton Lord, I don’t see how you can have an Attorney General who has never prosecuted a criminal case. This is even more ridiculous given that most of the attorneys at the AG’s office handle criminal matters, be it prosecution, appeals or PCRs.
By Todd on March 11th, 2010 at 8:03 pm
I think more of Alan Wilson for having failed the Bar – then not having Daddy get Jakie to call Queen Jean and get it “fixed.”
By WorkingTommyC on March 11th, 2010 at 9:39 pm
Not sure who impresses me most yet. I know that Wilson impresses me least due to his princely status. I’ll not vote for another political dynasty. I learned my lesson with Bush.
By AI on March 12th, 2010 at 8:53 am
TommyC,
That may be the dumbest reason in the world not to vote for someone. Judge the man on his credentials and accomplishments. If, after such evaluation, you decide he’s not the candidate for you, fine. But to eliminate a candidate solely on his last name is a woefully ignorant thing to do.
By D.G. on March 12th, 2010 at 9:09 am
WorkingTommyC,
Good morning. I’m a close friend of Alan and Jennifer. I wanted to respond to what you said about Alan’s “princely status.”
I think some people have an impression that because Alan’s father is in Congress, he has a silver spoon in his mouth. That’s not true. Alan’s family is middle class. Sure, his father has a few million dollars in his campaign account — but that’s from contributions, not family money. Alan will never see one dime of that.
Alan and his wife live a modest life in Lexington. They both have full-time jobs — working hard just trying to raise their children and give them the best life they can — like so many others — probably even you.
And let me tell you — lawyers who want to make a lot of money don’t go into public service — they don’t run for office and they don’t work as prosecutors — you could make a lot more money elsewhere. Think about it.
Alan has been a prosecutor because he believes in the importance of the work putting bad guys away. He feels a great deal of satisfaction in contributing to his community that way.
I wish you could know him like I do, WorkingTommyC. I think you’d really like him.
By Jack on March 12th, 2010 at 10:29 am
Please tell me what actual experience Lord has prosecuting crime? Really People – Working for a congressional committee doesn’t count! At least Wilson and Bolchoz have seen the inside of a courtroom during a criminal trial – can Lord say that? As the Chief Prosecutor for SC, the AG must have at least some experience prosecuting cases. Managing a bunch of money hungry civil lawyers is nowhere close to the experience that should be required of the future Chief Prosecutor of SC. Hopefully voters will recognize that!
By madcock on March 12th, 2010 at 8:45 pm
He’s trying to appeal to voters in a GOP primary.
As anyone who, for example, reads this site knows, most SC Republicans are flaming bigots who would much rather blame people who look different from them for the state’s problems, rather than doing the hard work and introspection to really improve our state.
It’s a smart move on his part. Just another version of Strom calling blacks who just wanted to be able vote in the 50’s and 60’s communists.
By fed up on March 13th, 2010 at 2:41 pm
He’s good looking, which is more than I can say of most of South Carolina’s butt ugly perverted over sixty elected trashbags. So who cares what he says! I mean, it might be a nice change to have a man who actually had a date before he was elected, so his main concern while in office isn’t trying to grope young pretty girls who remind him of all those who ignored him back before he got Internet porn, Viagra, and a position of public trust to be characterized as a member of this State’s Bubbageoisie.
By You Can Call Me Ma'am on March 16th, 2010 at 12:06 pm
WILSON: 8 yrs of prosecution experience? Not in the AG’s office. He was put into a limited-time grant position to prosecute gun crimes. That funding ended, and he was let go by the AG, and he joined a local law firm. LET GO. NOT RETAINED. The other attorneys were moved to other positions in the office.
Actually, the Prosecution Section is part of the larger Criminal Division. Sounds like a big deal to eliminate the prosecution section, but that is a small part of the Criminal Division. The SGJ is mandated by state law, so it isn’t going anywhere. Outside the SGJ, cases “conflicted out” by the local solicitor may be sent to the AG to accept or assign to a different solicitor. What is left is VAWA (federal grant money matching money), Insurance Fraud (other sources of funding), Medicaid Recipient Fraud (send ‘em back to HHS), Medicaid Provider Fraud (poorly managed but still brings in millions in fines and settlements, is federally mandated and federally funded 75-25), 2 sexually violent predator prosecutors (mandated by law) and ICAC whose work is mostly done through local law enforcement, SLED and FBI. Incidentally, Federal stimulus dollars requested and received for ICAC were used instead for early retirement buyouts in the AGs office late last year. ‘Nuff said.
Investigations are done by SLED for insurance fraud, ICAC, securities, and SGJ. The heaviest workload is in the area of criminal appeals — from death penalty cases to DUI appeals, as well as the civil post-conviction relief cases. (PCR cases are not required to be handled by the AG’s office…they are the responsibility of the solicitor’s offices but long ago the AG’s office took on the workload.) New law school grads and less-experienced attys handle most of the prosecution/appeal/PCR work, with few exceptions.
The majority of cases handled (and the most important ones) aren’t ones that you’ll read about in the newspaper, but they are cases that only LEIGHTON LORD has heavy experience handling: complex civil cases (for South Carolina only or multi-state) that may involve state and federal entities, and that pay off in multi-million dollar settlements. That money goes back to the taxpayers through the treasury — sometimes earmarked for certain purposes like reimbursement of Medicaid — with the office retaining a portion for legal fees, etc. Those civil settlements are what is keeping the AG’s office afloat during budget cuts, despite the near-doubling of staff numbers and out of control spending under McMaster.
By D.G. on March 16th, 2010 at 12:34 pm
To You Can Call Me Ma’am,
I am a close friend of Alan Wilson. Please stop spreading lies. Making up lies about Alan does not make your candidate look better.
Alan was not fired from the AG’s office. In fact, they fought to keep him. He left when he began his campaign for AG, because he didn’t want there to be a conflict of interest. Ask anyone at the AG’s office. He was -not- let go. In fact, they miss him very much — and look forward to his return as AG. I hope that happens for him. With his excellent experience and passion for prosecution, he is the best candidate in the field… and his fellow prosecutors know it.
~D.G.
By SCLegaleagle on March 16th, 2010 at 2:43 pm
It is personally bothersome that Leighton Lord holds himself out as a proven crimefighter and in one of the most important positions possible on the subject. The cop on the street is the most important crime fighter. Only slightlymore than 1/3rd of Sheriffs have supported anyone, and the count is zero for anyone not named Alan Wilson. The real crime fighters are supporting Alan, whose military experience tells you that real (and supported) officers don’t take the credit for their Soldiers. Taking a deposition of a bad guy is not what crime fighting is about.
The fact that he takes credit as a “proven” crimefighter or that he had one of the most imortant positions is not only laughable and absurd, it is pathetic. God forbid he gets dirt under his nails or leave the boardroom. His TV add was a bit light and early, and should have done nothing but tick off every cop and every friedn or family members of cops.
By Hymanisanidiot on March 16th, 2010 at 4:41 pm
Leighton Lord’s wife Caroline is REALLY hot! She should be featured in his campaign ads, not him.
By BJB from SC on March 16th, 2010 at 10:07 pm
My problem is the lies.
1. Wilson is a member of the bar. check their website
2. In research, Wilson was an attorney before he went to war, then got married after he returned. Therefore how cold his “wife” call people in reaction to not passing?
3. I have talked with several from the AG office, and there was no firing or letting go. He left to run for office.
4. He was a prosecutor on several kinds of cases and on the payroll according to the Lexington solicitors office. By the way, Donnie Myers has endorsed him.
It appears Bolchoz and Wilson have the prerequisites for the job, and Lord is covering it up with spreading rumors. If Bolchoz was more of a factor, I am sure Lord would smear him as well. Shameful for someone seeking that particular office.
On a last note, I have not seen Lord’s wife, but Jennifer is smoking hot. Anyone know what Bolchoz better half look like?
By R on March 17th, 2010 at 4:28 am
The last thing SC needs is yet ANOTHER son-of-politician in office. I was really pissed when I started receiving a bunch of Allan Wilson e-mails just because I signed up for Joe Wilson’s newsletter. Seems he’s not only trying to ride daddy’s coattails but has daddy’s staff running his campaign. All I know is that Lord is a great guy who is not interested in using the AG’s office as a stepping stone for other political office. He’s worked in the private sector which is important over people who only have been in the political arena all their lives. IT just makes me sick to see Wilson’s son, Campbell’s son, and now Strom’s son all run for office. Its bad enough we had some of these people in office but do we really need their loser children in office too? I mean what has Alan Wilson ever done on his own? I bet every job he’s had is because daddy got it for him. I’ll vote for Joe because Miller is a douche bag but I’m sure as hell not voting for Joe Wilson mimi me.
By D.G. on March 17th, 2010 at 9:06 am
R,
I would like to respectfully respond to your post about Alan Wilson, a close friend of mine.
It upset me to hear you write “what has Alan Wilson ever done on his own?” You are automatically assuming that he has been successful because of his father — and only because of his father. That is not true.
Let me tell you what Alan has done on his own:
Alan got his job at the Lexington County Solicitor’s office on his own merit. He successfully tried countless cases — including achieving something no other solicitor there has — 3 trial wins in one week. His boss there — Solicitor Donnie Myers — is now supporting him wholeheartedly in his candidacy. Alan’s success there led to his job as an Assistant Attorney General at the Attorney General’s office. Again, he successfully prosecuted cases there. Was his father there when he successfully presented evidence? cross examined witnesses? got guilty verdicts? No. His father had nothing to do with getting him those jobs… or his success with those jobs.
Then, there’s Alan’s military experience. Alan volunteered to serve his country in the National Guard… one of the most selfless acts one can do. While serving a year in Iraq as part of a field artillery batallion, Alan volunteered to lead a dangerous convoy through two insurgent attacks — evacuating soldiers from harm’s way and leading his troops to safety… a tremendous success for which he was awarded with the South Carolina National Guard’s highest honor, The Palmetto Cross. If that’s not leadership, nothing is.
Did Joe instill the values of public service and military service in Alan? Absolutely! Did Joe get Alan “free rides” and nepotistic perks? No way. Alan has worked hard for everything in his life. Unfortunately, he always has to fight the perception that Joe has got him everything he has. It’s just not true.
If you don’t think Alan is the best candidate for AG, then by all means don’t vote for him. But please don’t make assumptions about him that you can’t back up with facts. Alan is his own man with his own accomplishments. He can’t help who his dad is… can you?
Also, please don’t assume that Alan is using the AG’s office as a stepping stone to something bigger. Alan feels a great deal of satisfaction prosecuting cases and putting bad guys away so that families are safer. That’s why Alan has devoted his career to that. That’s why he’s running for AG. Can Leighton say that? No.
And if Alan were just riding daddy’s coattails, as you say, why have so many sheriffs in our state endorsed him? Now more than half of them. And 100% of sheriffs who are publicly endorsing a candidate are endorsing Alan. They are white, black, Republican, Democrat. You know what that says to me? That Alan has what it takes to be the state’s top cop — and our noble law enforcement officers know it.
And by the way, Joe’s staff is not running Alan’s campaign. They’ve got enough going on just with Joe. Think about it.
~D.G.
By Caty on March 17th, 2010 at 4:50 pm
Alan wasn’t in a grant position. He was in State Grand Jury. He wasn’t fired. Everyone wanted him to stay. He left on his own accord, and he gave over 6 weeks notice. SVP isn’t prosecuted in criminal court.It’s Common Pleas. All of the other sections are under the Criminal Section at the AG’S office, but, I repeat, Lord said himself he wants to “ELIMINATE the prosecution section”. Perhaps he should backtrack or read the Constitution. The Solicitor’s are bombarded with hundreds of thousands of cases. I’m sure they would just love to take back PCR. Perhaps they can just start appealing their own cases, too. I’m sure they can afford to hire more Assistant Solicitors.
Further, Alan is his own man. He has never ridden on his dad’s coattails. He completed two tours of duty, and he buried some friends in the process. He prosecuted in Lexington and at the AG’s office. He is also a JAG officer. Although I’m sure that he has learned from watching his dad, he DID not run for his dad’s State Senate Seat. He’s not running for Congress. He IS running for AG. A job he is well-qualified for. Not only does he have criminal expereince, but also he is now getting civil expereince. Plus, he is smart enough and humble enough to surround himself with expereinced, qualified and highly intelligent individuals–a hallmark of any good leader.
Seriously, Lord has no criminal experience. A Senate sub-committee is the extent of his “experience”. The head Solicitor of the State is going to be a man with no criminal background? Talk about embarassing….
If you’re going to throw stones at least get your facts right. And yes, Jennifer is smoking hot, intelligent and a very nice person.
By You Can Call Me Ma'am on March 17th, 2010 at 6:18 pm
Dear DG — I was there, as were other employees. (And I’m still here.) He didn’t know until the day before his last one that he was leaving. Others were retained, he was not and was the last to know. Be careful whose spear you fall upon, my dear. When it’s mine, I play to win.
By You Can Call Me Ma'am on March 17th, 2010 at 6:20 pm
And by the way, I never said he was fired. He was not retained when the grant ended.
By You Can Call Me Ma'am on March 17th, 2010 at 6:22 pm
And Caty, SVP may be heard in common pleas, but it is supervised in the prosecution division by an criminal appeals attorney.
By D.G. on March 17th, 2010 at 9:54 pm
Hi Call me Ma’am,
I have it on excellent authority from within your office and from others who were with Alan when he made his decision to leave. It is very frustrating For those of us who know first hand the truth to read the absolute lie you’ve published. Alan notified his boss, the late Jennifer Evans, just before the Home Gold trial that he was leaving. He left several weeks later, on excellent terms. Alan even announced to the office he was leaving and was there for several weeks after that. Finally, I recently spoke with someone who was with Alan when he made his decision to run for AG several months earlier. Alan was already planning to leave the office long before he gave his notice. My information is from first hand accounts. What you say makes no sense.
DG
By You Can Call Me Ma'am on March 18th, 2010 at 12:31 am
ROFL. ROFL. ROFL. No surprise that the only thing you can do is yell YOU LIE. BTW I was more than happy to support Alan and even talked with him by phone long ago. But supporters like you have done him more harm than good and caused many to move to the undecided category or quietly support another candidate. Y’all have kept this issue in the spotlight by continuing to comment and react. You’re an amateur asshole and you took the bait so own it. SHANK!
By Calhoun Fawls on April 10th, 2010 at 5:16 am
You can call me ma’am, are you the fat man in drag.
By Andy on May 25th, 2010 at 3:26 pm
Alan Wilson is a good friend of mine as well. I have know the family for years. He a good person who will represent South Carolina well, and he is a great candidate for AG. He gets my vote, hands down.
Thank you for telling the truth about our next Attorney General, DG.