By FITSNews || We don’t subscribe to The (Columbia, S.C.) State newspaper – a.k.a. La Socialista. Or any other newspaper for that matter.
“Print is dead,” people.
Anyway, people who still subscribe to that worthless commie rag do occasionally forward us items of interest, though, like the following advertisement that appeared in Sunday’s coupon section of The State …
Yeah …
At first we thought this was a joke, but no … no, no … it’s very real.
Oh, and very expensive. The “Barack Obama: Birth of Hope” doll can be yours … but it’ll cost you – five payments of $30 to be precise (plus $17 shipping and handling).
For other “Obama Assimilation Updates,” click here.
By countryboy March 8, 2010 at 9:57 am
$166.98 for a f’ing half black doll? Only affluent liberals (and maybe Lindsey Graham) would buy one of those. And “birth of hope”? My ass.
By reprobate March 8, 2010 at 11:23 am
If you buy one of these dolls, you might also be interested in one of these:
http://www.thisnext.com/item/C469EF9A/Designer-Barf-Bags-by-redstr
By OhNoNotAgain March 8, 2010 at 1:43 pm
How do you know it’s half black?
By Jack March 8, 2010 at 5:54 pm
“$166.98 for a f’ing half black doll?”
And we wonder why we can’t get companies to move their headquarters here. Whats not to like? We’re so obviously not the bunch of redneck racists the rest of the country believes we are.
By southernmapart March 8, 2010 at 6:51 pm
I believe that Obama is half Nubian Egyptian. Oh, well.
+1 on the reason companies don’t move their headquarters here.
By James the Foot Soldier March 8, 2010 at 9:12 pm
Only the ACTUAL birth certificate will unveil the true fraction.
By CNChapin March 9, 2010 at 9:13 am
Hey, Jack(off) and southernmapart, racism is in the eye of the beholder.
“$166.98 for a f’ing half black doll?”
MaObama had a black father and a white mother. If the doll is meant to be modeled after him, then it would be “half black” or “half white” depending on how you look at it. I fail to see the racism in this assertion. If you want to find racism in things, you will whether it is truly there or not.
I guess next thing we know you’ll be calling us racist for using the term “black holes” to refer to the things in outer space which suck up everything around them and crush it down to nothing-ness all while not providing a single damned positive contribution to the universe?
By WorkingTommyC March 9, 2010 at 12:12 pm
CNChapin:
By your definition we a lot of have black holes in the statehouse.
=:>)
By Jack March 10, 2010 at 5:36 pm
CNChapin, I conceed the debate. From your post you are obviously not a racist.
As for the black holes perhaps you need to stay up to date on your science. Current theory holds that black holes are at the center of most galaxies, and are a necessary element of galaxy formation. In short if it were not for black holes you would not be here. Oh! I see your point, never mind.
By CNChapin March 11, 2010 at 9:34 am
Jack, I’m not sure if you’re being honest or sarcastic, but I will say that if you have a bag full of crap, it matters not what color the bag is.
Shitty people are shitty people. The color of their skin is irrelevant. I can find enough reasons to dislike people based on what’s on the inside. I don’t need skin color as a factor. ;)
I also am familiar with what you are speaking of regarding black holes. The former definition just fit my analogy better and I have actually dealt with someone in a work environment before who called someone else a racist because they used the term “black hole.” Yes, they were referring to the things in the universe from which no light can escape and not using it in any derogatory fashion.