<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DUI Or DWT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/</link>
	<description>Politics, Sports and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUI</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-131516</link>
		<dc:creator>DUI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-131516</guid>
		<description>Yeah I have to agree, texting while driving is way more dangerous than driving drunk. One caveat would be that it would depend on the person&#039;s BAC level while driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I have to agree, texting while driving is way more dangerous than driving drunk. One caveat would be that it would depend on the person&#8217;s BAC level while driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenHomeBuilding</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-121105</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenHomeBuilding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-121105</guid>
		<description>Yeah I think it would be better if people would not text and not drink, I know I would feel a lot safer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think it would be better if people would not text and not drink, I know I would feel a lot safer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunk driving</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-86229</link>
		<dc:creator>drunk driving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-86229</guid>
		<description>I agree that DWT is more dangerous. It&#039;s true that at least you have your eyes on the road when your drunk. But I&#039;d feel a whole lot safer knowing no one is driving drunk or driving and texting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that DWT is more dangerous. It&#8217;s true that at least you have your eyes on the road when your drunk. But I&#8217;d feel a whole lot safer knowing no one is driving drunk or driving and texting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85829</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85829</guid>
		<description>Still waiting on Toyota drivers to blame brake or accelerator sensor failure on electronic interference from a) an officer&#039;s radar or b) the signal from their phone or handheld that tehy were texting on when incident happened...

personal injury shysters take note, I don&#039;t hang a freebie like this one out often, amuse me by trying to use it in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting on Toyota drivers to blame brake or accelerator sensor failure on electronic interference from a) an officer&#8217;s radar or b) the signal from their phone or handheld that tehy were texting on when incident happened&#8230;</p>
<p>personal injury shysters take note, I don&#8217;t hang a freebie like this one out often, amuse me by trying to use it in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stimulus</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85763</link>
		<dc:creator>stimulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85763</guid>
		<description>Is there a law that bans reading a newspaer while driving? How about putting on make up while driving?... We do not need more laws, if it is dangerous just don&#039;t do it ( by the way, I&#039;m driving while writing this)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a law that bans reading a newspaer while driving? How about putting on make up while driving?&#8230; We do not need more laws, if it is dangerous just don&#8217;t do it ( by the way, I&#8217;m driving while writing this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85755</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85755</guid>
		<description>I personally prefer TWDD (texting while driving drunk). Lets not pussyfoot around here. Either you&#039;re a badass or you aren&#039;t. If you&#039;re gonna go, go all out! GD underachieving half-assing do gooders. So annoying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally prefer TWDD (texting while driving drunk). Lets not pussyfoot around here. Either you&#8217;re a badass or you aren&#8217;t. If you&#8217;re gonna go, go all out! GD underachieving half-assing do gooders. So annoying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genomic Repairman</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85739</link>
		<dc:creator>Genomic Repairman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85739</guid>
		<description>Man I just got a warning for texting at a red light and found out that a ticket for it could cost me $500.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man I just got a warning for texting at a red light and found out that a ticket for it could cost me $500.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtbogger</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85718</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtbogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85718</guid>
		<description>The answer is dirt roads, they are hard to text on (too bumpy). Just tear up all the asphault, plus it would make drinking and driving fun again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is dirt roads, they are hard to text on (too bumpy). Just tear up all the asphault, plus it would make drinking and driving fun again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85701</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85701</guid>
		<description>Sic, no one is denying that people shouldn&#039;t be texting while driving - but the real problem is with the enforcement of the issue. The fact is by having another unenforceable law (easy to text out of sight) it will allow police to profile individuals easier and abuse their powers.

Also, texting is equally as distracting as eating food, changing clothes, shaving, putting on make-up, making love, yelling at kids, changing the radio, petting your dog, looking at billboards, etc. Do you want a law for every scenario that could impair drivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sic, no one is denying that people shouldn&#8217;t be texting while driving &#8211; but the real problem is with the enforcement of the issue. The fact is by having another unenforceable law (easy to text out of sight) it will allow police to profile individuals easier and abuse their powers.</p>
<p>Also, texting is equally as distracting as eating food, changing clothes, shaving, putting on make-up, making love, yelling at kids, changing the radio, petting your dog, looking at billboards, etc. Do you want a law for every scenario that could impair drivers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOHANNA</title>
		<link>http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/02/08/dui-or-dwt/#comment-85693</link>
		<dc:creator>MOHANNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fitsnews.com/?p=39604#comment-85693</guid>
		<description>Right now the law only protects the blackerry&#039;s civil liberties. Not the passengers or other drivers.  It&#039;s the story of &quot;All The People Were Killed In The Head-on Collision, but the Cell Phone Survived&quot; and your right to use them while driving survived.  Cold Comfort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now the law only protects the blackerry&#8217;s civil liberties. Not the passengers or other drivers.  It&#8217;s the story of &#8220;All The People Were Killed In The Head-on Collision, but the Cell Phone Survived&#8221; and your right to use them while driving survived.  Cold Comfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

