By FITSNews || Alright, alright … we don’t actually hate Lindsey Graham. We don’t hate anybody, truth be told, we just call it like we see it around here, which often involves calling out politicians like Graham for their left-leaning hypocrisy.
Anyway, as strident as we’ve been at times in our criticism of the fair Senator from Seneca, we’ve got nothing on this guy, who appears in a new video from the American Resistance Movement, a group that (bless their hearts) appears to be to the right of everybody.
Like, everybody.
Wowzers! That guy is almost as fired up as the dude from Green County Tennessee who damned Lane Kiffin to hell!
Anyway, once you get past all the lisping and banana clip theatrics, the guy’s fundamental point is that Graham flip-flopped on his position on hate crimes legislation, a claim which appears to be accurate …
UPDATE: Dude, of course you don’t have a lisp … now please, put … the … gun … down …
By countryboy January 14, 2010 at 8:22 pm
I’m betting little Lindsey soiled his drawers when that guy confronted him at the meeting.
By Mab January 14, 2010 at 8:37 pm
What did he say? Our tolerance for tolerance is growing sslim? He’s right – quite right.
###
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=406
By me January 14, 2010 at 10:27 pm
Gotta love all those brain dead rinos in there.
By Old Bike Dude January 14, 2010 at 11:02 pm
OK so if this asshole ever served a day in his miserable life it was def after “don’t ask don’t tell”. How gay do you have to be to dress up in camo, hold an AK, and vomit some bullshit in front of the newest symbol of anal lonliness? Real gay. Not guy on guy gay, no I’m talking 7-8 guys on one guy gay. I mean he makes Lindsey look like a badass.
Where did you find this guy? NAMBLA thinks this asshole is weird. Look for him in an upcoming episode of Cops. Yeah the one where they showcase homosexual transgendered lot lizards on I-85. Get real.
By southernmapart January 14, 2010 at 11:17 pm
Not all attending were brain dead or RINOS. Many who oppose L’le Lindsey were in attendance. A group of Pickens County voters gathered at a restaurant and made signs of protest to carry and show outside the building. Signs were not allowed inside.
There was a substantial contingent of Oconee County voters there to hear what Lindsey would say attempting to gloss over his votes against the people of South Carolina.
It is so bad for Graham that in Seneca, where he lives, he does not appear around the public before any appearance, but hides out somewhere in the parking lot and shows at the last minutes, then hustles out.
Just another Log Cabin Republican making it extremely difficult to hold together a decent society where we can rear our children. L’le Lindsey has not got a single clue about what it takes to bring up a child.
I wish Jenny Sanford would run for this US Senate seat.
By CNNMe January 14, 2010 at 11:18 pm
Larry Grooms, is that you?
By The Douche January 15, 2010 at 12:14 am
1) Why did I think this was an intro to a wrestling match? I guess I got confused after the Junkyard Dog reference.
2) I love how he is “unafraid of Homeland Security” yet he bounces like a huge pussy after a Clemson rent-a-cop asked him nicely to leave.
3) This guy runs American Resistance Radio with a lisp?
My suggestion: He should take the dick out of his mouth before speaking so people almost take him seriously. And that’s a big almost.
By T4 January 15, 2010 at 3:10 am
HAHA! Please tell me which AM station I can hear this guy. It won’t be too long before Limbaugh offers him a spot. Then again, it probably wouldn’t work; I mean, how many times can you write off Rx copays and Wild Turkey 101?
He’s right about one thing only, Graham failed to follow through. But I don’t understand his misdirected anger for being forced to leave. I’m afraid he should have left his wantonly disruptive antics back at the Esso Club. Assuming his latent anger over SC’s D.U.I laws remained dormant, perhaps his message would have been more potent if he took formal measures to steadily voice his questions/concerns. I feel certain his new status as, “Poster Boy for Castration” is secure, unless he turns his back on whiskey and reruns of “The A-Team.”
By T4 January 15, 2010 at 3:16 am
Old Bike Dude,
Best comment, hands down.
By Bob January 15, 2010 at 6:10 am
Understanding that it is easier to call people gay when you don’t agree with them than to answer his point, I would ask:
Is he right? Do we need to turn Lindsey Graham out?
By jimmy January 15, 2010 at 7:32 am
Will, if you read the comments at the Conservativist’s website that you linked to, you’ll see that Graham’s office officially responded about the vote on hate crimes. Graham did NOT vot for the hate crimes bill. The ranting loon above was incorrect.
The final bill passed 68-29 (it was part of the larger Defense Authorization Act), but Senators Graham and DeMint both voted AGAINST it due to the Hate Crimes amendment. Here’s the link to the vote where you can see they both voted NAY:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00327
I’ve copied the comment below from Graham’s office.
Kevin Bishop says:
October 14, 2009 at 11:12 am
Gary, not sure where you are getting your information from but it is incorrect.
Senator Graham has consistently voted against the Hate Crimes legislation in both the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee. He also discussed his opposition to the Hate Crimes provision in great length at the Greenville town hall meeting this week. (http://www.greenvilleonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009910130317)
The Senate voted to include the hate crimes provision on the defense authorization bill.
Senator Graham did not make the vote, but he put a statement in the Congressional Record indicating that he would have opposed the hate crimes amendment. Cloture was invoked on the amendment by a vote of 63 – 28.
NOT VOTING on cloture is the same as a NO vote since 60 affirmative votes are needed to cut off debate. (Basically, 59-0 is a loss on cloture, 60-0 is a win.)
Here is the transcript of the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from West Virginia (Mr. Byrd) and the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. Kennedy) are necessarily absent.
Mr. KYL. The following Senators are necessarily absent: the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Alexander), the Senator from Missouri (Mr. Bond), the Senator from Kentucky (Mr. Bunning), the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Corker), the Senator from South Carolina (Mr. Graham), the Senator from New Hampshire (Mr. Gregg), and the Senator from Florida (Mr. Martinez).
Further, if present and voting, the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Alexander) would have voted “nay,” the Senator from Kentucky (Mr. Bunning) would have voted “nay,” the Senator from South Carolina (Mr. Graham) would have voted “nay,” and the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. Corker) would have voted “nay.”” (Congressional Record, July 16, 2009)
While Senator Graham supported sending the defense authorization bill to conference, he did so while vigorously opposing the addition of hate crimes and telling Chairman Levin (D-Michigan) that he would not support a conference report that included hate crimes.
In previous years, the Democrats removed hate crimes from the final defense authorization conference report. Unfortunately, this year they did not.
As a result, Senator Graham joined 8 other Republican conferees – Senators Jim Inhofe (Oklahoma), Jeff Sessions (Alabama), Saxby Chambliss (Georgia), John Thune (South Dakota), Roger F. Wicker (Mississippi), George S. LeMieux (Florida), Richard Burr (North Carolina), David Vitter (Louisiana)– in NOT signing the conference report. (Sens. McCain and Collins were the only Republicans to sign.)
The Senate has yet to take up the conference report for a final vote.
I hope you will make a correction to your story and print my response in the comment section to clear up the erroneous information contained in this story.
Kevin Bishop
Communications Director
U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham
By FITSNews January 15, 2010 at 8:04 am
Graham AND this guy are ranting loons as far as weeze concerned …
By Stumpy January 15, 2010 at 8:16 am
I think I saw this guy at Walmart in Lexington.
By Old Bike Dude January 15, 2010 at 8:22 am
T-4 thanks for the prop. @Bob, no I called him gay because, well, he’s gay.
By haireofthedog January 15, 2010 at 8:36 am
Interesting logo the guy’s got there. Maybe it was intentional, maybe it was not, (let’s give him the benefit of the doubt), but it looks like a mash-up of the “White Pride World Wide” logo and another a White Power fist symbol. Awesome.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&um=1&sa=1&q=white+power+symbol&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&start=0
By Darth January 15, 2010 at 9:11 am
Did Jakie take the mask off after trying to build his conservative credo?
OTOH, this does smack of moveon.org spoofing that discredits “both sides” of the non-far left (e.g. the left and separately anything to the right of it).
By Doyle January 15, 2010 at 10:21 am
Why do you give morons like this a forum?
By FITSNews January 15, 2010 at 10:25 am
Doyle-
Cause this is show business – and he’s friggin’ hilarious!
-FITS
By ohara January 15, 2010 at 12:30 pm
Interesting that he can’t make his political point without his wittle gun. Agree with Old Bike Dude-this guy has never served.
By WorkingTommyC January 15, 2010 at 12:54 pm
This fellow needs to be at every event that Lindsey attends. Instead of speaking, however, he needs to just sit in the audience in the front row up close to the lectern and just stare hard at him the whole time.
By Weighing In January 15, 2010 at 1:03 pm
this looks like something picked up by Al-Jazeera
By YouMakeMeFITS January 15, 2010 at 3:05 pm
Oh boy, I think I am going to be FITS after watching this video.
For the record, if this poser did serve – he is the guy who was like the janitor for supply maitenance state side and broke and arm when he tripped up sweeping the warehouse; subsquently he requested a purple heart.
Psychos like this are exactly what will keep moderate and even convservatie Republican’s voting for Graham in a primary, because the thought is “Well, I either vote for Lindsey Graham or get this maniac’s older brother who studied politics for one class period before getting kicked out of highschool.”
By Patriot1776 January 15, 2010 at 10:33 pm
I am sure that illegal mexican loving jerkoff Graham is not sleeping well these days. You can bet SLED is watching this dude in the video. But the thing is, there are millions just like him who are fed up with all politicians.
What can be done to protect politicians from millions of boiling mad voters? I dunno. All I know is people like Graham suck.
By Bob January 16, 2010 at 7:50 am
Old Bike Dude,
How do you know he is gay? Personal experience or is your gaydar up?
By Old Bike Dude January 16, 2010 at 9:15 pm
Gee Bob are you defending this douche? Have I struck a nerve? Didn’t mean to offend your delicate sense of humanity, but this asshole a fairy boy from way back. Real men state their case, plain and in simple terms, lacking theatrics, and then they move on, which is exactly what I will now do, see ya.
By sid January 17, 2010 at 1:46 am
I always thought OBD was a liberal, but now he sounds like a hardcore homophobe. I thought that wasn’t allowed in the DNC.
By T4 January 17, 2010 at 4:10 pm
Patriot, don’t confuse your racist disposition with border control – they’re not one in the same, you simpleton. It’s interesting how your border argument focuses only on our neighbors to the South rather than the North: the conservative argument for racism is now to claim “border control.” The problems with border control to our South are hardly as important as the problems to our North – extremists with intent to kill.
Sid, below are just a few definitions given for the word you continue to use as an emphatic putdown.
Liberal: 1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
Given my moderate disposition, I challenge you to find something blatantly taboo or homophobic about this word. Keep in mind, many liberals are much more moderate than Fox News would have you believe.
By sid January 18, 2010 at 12:18 pm
Why so sensitive to being called “liberal,” T4? All I said was I thought OBD was one. How is that a putdown? According to #7 in your cute little list of self-affirmations, my analysis of OBD/DNC is accurate. Or are you OK with using accusations of homosexuality as part of a rant of insults about some nut-case. I’m betting that the homosexual community doesn’t think so, but if you say it’s OK, and not homophobic, then I guess I’ll just have to take you at your word. Seems to me I’ve seen plenty from the gay community get pissed off at such things, but maybe I’m mistaken.
So, to your challenge, read OBD’s first post, and tell me what part of his rant shows he is “free from prejudice or bigotry.” Again, I’m talking about OBD’s rant, not liberals in general, so get your panties out of a wad and explain to me how his rant is OK with the gay community.
By Martha Washington January 19, 2010 at 11:22 pm
He is not gay. So what if he has a lisp. Find something important to criticize. So many people are lazy and apathetic, that some on the other extreme are well- extreme. I know this dude. This guy is just passionate about the state of affairs in America. The logo is real and the resistance is real. Sometimes he does things that shock, but perhaps that’s the motive.
By Martha Washington January 20, 2010 at 9:10 pm
however….