Comments on: La Socialista Fires Another Dozen Employees

By: Ed Mann

Ed Mann — Sat, 22 May 2010 18:56:50 +0000

Devan is correct. There is a major factual error in the post and it leads me to wonder if this hack pretend journalist reads the paper. If he did, the error would be quite apparent.

From the hack pretend journalist’s parents on the domestic abuse charges against him:
“We take very seriously the charge against our son but we are convinced that he is innocent of the charge. Will joins us in placing faith in God, and relying on our family and friends for support.”

The hack pretend journalist then pled guilty.

Thanks God.

By: martha washington

martha washington — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:14:03 +0000

Most newspapers are financed by the same few monopolists in this country. The STATE, in specific, is clearly biased. Their agenda on illegal immigration, for example, is to zip-it at the expense of the guilt or innocence of those in the city judicial system.

An excellent paper is the Times Examiner from Greenville. Editor Bob Dill covers many unreported stories. http://www.timesexaminer.com You can subscribe in paper or email subscription.

Many large city SC papers are owned by the same company and they say the same news. Or half of the news anyway.

By: SnakeMD

SnakeMD — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:40:39 +0000

So, Devan where is the inaccuracy in this post? Do you want footnotes? So, why stick your head in the door and then leave without saying anything? Hell, anybody can call a foul. Let’s hear it! Thanks…

By: Devan Galloway

Devan Galloway — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:09:21 +0000

There is a major inaccuracy in this report. Guess that’s what happens when people rely on blogs who pass along only what they hear without any verification or fact checking.

By: WorkingTommyC

WorkingTommyC — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:43:02 +0000

I have no trouble with the press advocating political stands. If not for a (truly) free and adversarial press, we’d have had no revolution to establish this country. I’ll argue with them over which stands they advocate and the logic of their politics but they’re perfectly free to be whey want.

My problem with Der Staat is that they let the crooks in the statehouse get away with murder. I just can’t believe that they won’t, AT LEAST from a survival standpoint, work to make a positive difference and thereby make themselves an essential part of the conversation. They could have increased their readership to the point that NO ONE would have been fired from there.

Instead, they treat their jobs as, well, JOBS. They’re just a bunch of working slobs who come in to work and do what they have to do to get by. And that’s it. They don’t take risks. There’s nothing combustible about them. You can’t even use their paper to start a fire.

There should be a mission. They should be after the TRUTH no matter where that takes them.

Instead, intellectual wallpaper hangers like Bradwart just added more layers of bs that rationalized his big government, socialist/fascist stands in the context of what one politician wanted vs. what another wanted and another wanted and so on. He seems to have forgotten about the law and gotten tangled up in the intrigue in which he had long ago determined to be a player.

Bradwart could have taken a hammer to the wall instead and exposed the broken sewer pipe behind the wall over and over again. But nooooo! He thought a few more layers of paper and perfumed words will make the air as fresh as Lindsey’s Graham’s posterior (which he STILL likes and wishes people would quit picking on it–he has a prior claim on all the fleas).

By: Jeffy

Jeffy — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:19:07 +0000

Thank goodness Warren Bolton was saved. What would readers do if we lost his insight on his Sunday school class? How we would all miss his weekly whinning about payday lenders? Whew, we dodged a bullet. Keep on preaching Warren.

By: Sean R

Sean R — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:54:43 +0000

sucks

By: No Name

No Name — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:27:38 +0000

How about reporting the details of the offer that was made for this media property and the thinking that turned it down.

I am thinking that they would love to have that money now.

The day this property sells will be the day the State of SC begins to see the truth published about the financial fraud that is the State’s finances.

Hey “McClaughly” try calling them back and saying the future is bright as you know a disaster is coming that will no doubt help circulation.

By: Tank McNamara

Tank McNamara — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:58:48 +0000

how about a newspaper that just reports the news without putting any spin or opinions in it? that certainly would be a novel idea. there is very little “news” reported anymore. it seems that every article has a certain spin to it based on the writer’s political or philosophical bent.

By: Liberty For Me

Liberty For Me — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:38:32 +0000

I think the name the STATE speaks volumes…..I think the original meaning was to cover the state.But now seems to further an agenda.When you look at it that way it is a little creepy.
How about the “SC Independant”?? …now fire everybody but the paperboy and the printers