How Things “Get Done” In SC

By fitsnews • on December 28, 2009
Comment Print

rear end

For the better part of seven years, S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford has worked to restructure South Carolina’s antiquated, bass-ackwards government so that chief executives and their lieutenants could run on the same ticket – like they do at the federal level and in most other states.

Of course, as with Sanford’s other structural and economic reforms, this effort has been stymied at every turn by status quo lawmakers like State Sen. Glenn McConnell.

Meanwhile, State Sen. Jakie “Ol’ Knocky” Knotts (a longtime Sanford antagonist) has fought for years to get a taxpayer-funded security detail for his best buddy, Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer – only to be stymied at every turn by allies of Sanford (and enemies of Bauer).

In both cases, an impasse had been reached, guaranteeing that neither objective would ever get accomplished (which in the case of a taxpayer-funded security detail for Bauer is obviously a good thing).

Anyway, “reform” works in mysterious ways in South Carolina.

Thanks to Sanford’s “Summer of Love” scandal with Maria Belen Chapur – in which he created a Constitutional crisis by disappearing for five days to frolic in Buenos Aires with his Latin lover – both the structural change being sought by the governor and Bauer’s security detail are part of a new set of proposed state laws sponsored by … wait for it … Glenn McConnell.

Amazing.

Could it be that Sanford is finally “getting things done” by “gittin’ er done?”  Because if so, that could make for an enjoyable legislative strategy for him moving forward.

Meanwhile, if Bauer has a brain (and the jury’s definitely still out on that one) he would immediately recognize this as a golden opportunity to drop his ridiculous quest for a security detail that he clearly doesn’t need.

Seriously … such a nonessential spending request is hard to justify in any budget environment, let alone this one.

Oh, and whatever the reason for its reemergence on our political radar screens, Bauer (like all 2010 gubernatorial candidates) would be wise to embrace the long-overdue notion of governors and lieutenant governors running on the same ticket, which would finally put an end to the nonsensical debate over the transferring of executive “power” in South Carolina.

Finally, another of the “Maria Belen Chapur Bills” to be brought up in 2010 involves a “recall” option that would let South Carolina voters fire the governor if they collect the appropriate number of signatures.

While we have concerns with the current recall mechanism that state lawmakers are advocating, we support a recall component to the State Constitution.

Of course, that mechanism must apply to all elected officials, not just statewide officers …

Share 
fitsfinger

Comments

By Judy on December 28th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

let’s hope the governor decides to live full time in Argentine with his soul mate!

By Ynot on December 28th, 2009 at 4:20 pm

anything sanfraud wants should raise red flags all over the place.
Don’t give Sanfraud anything , not nuthin, he wants.

By stand828 on December 28th, 2009 at 4:25 pm

Can we recall Jean Toal too? Please?

By bo on December 28th, 2009 at 6:12 pm

andre””’ bauer better get that detail now. thankfully, i don’t think SC has devolved enough to elect a redneck from irmo as governor

By Todd on December 28th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

I am with you, stand828. Street talk this week is the ole Queen Jean is up to her arse in this Charlie Segars-Andrews mess and be damned to all those who think otherwise. Legislators need to cancel their New Years holiday plans and get to work – because Jean is working this one hard. There can be no investigation into her sacred Commission on Judicial Conduct. (That’s just and her political cronies, FYI.) After “they” decide what will make the Court and Jean look the best, then all other details will fall into place. However, there are cracks in those backroom walls……..

By 2 cents on December 28th, 2009 at 8:39 pm

Clean their asses out of the Capitol and let’s start new. If there are any decent ones, they can stay. Foward, march. It’s way past time.

By Doris on December 28th, 2009 at 8:45 pm

There you go again. You criticize your governor no matter what he says. It seems to me, he’s looking out for South Carolina as he should be.

By Liberty For Me on December 28th, 2009 at 8:52 pm

Ynot..what do you base your ignorant comments on??

By Calhoun Fawls on December 29th, 2009 at 1:45 am

Ughhh! The BS about Lt. Governors being elected separately is being dragged into this. A majority of the states who have Lt. Governors elect them on their own.

There are a few reasons for such. First, the Lt. Governor in the states that have them is the President of the State Senate. Other states see that as something that should be elected by all the people, unless you like New York or New Jersey, who think that the executive should lord over the legislative branch.

Second, when will a Lt. Governor be nominated? We do not have state political conventions that are equal to the federal level with President. Will candidates choose their Lt. Governors when they announce and run on a primary ticket? Will party leaders really defer to gubernatorial nominees and just rubber stamp their picks for Lt. Governor?

Sometimes I want to cry out at the ignorance of those who keep thinking state government ought to be more like the federal government. Is it really a good thing to take the selection of the Lt. Governor out of the hands of the people and hand it over to some group of political hacks in some cigar smoked filled back room? Is that what you think progress and reform is?

By David on December 29th, 2009 at 10:28 am

I’m totally against combining Lt Gov and Gov into a ticket.

Why would we want one career politician selecting another career politician to run with him? Having the opportunity to elect individuals based on merit and not their political deal-making experience is good for this state.

Continue giving me the opportunity to elect those like Mick Zais, Bill Connor and others. I for one do not want anymore backroom dealmakers. I want real conservative leadership.

By WorkingTommyC on December 29th, 2009 at 11:28 am

At the state level, I have yet to see a reasonable argument for a combined ticket.

This is plainly something not worthy of spending any time nor energy on.

Naturally, with that being the case, here comes Glenn!

But then, one waste deserves another, I suppose.

Leave a Comment