Global Wa … Wait A Minute!
The unknown computer hackers who raided the database of a globally-renowned British climate research center couldn’t have asked for a better haul …
In thousands of emails and documents dating back over a decade, some of the world’s foremost climatologists are exposed as petty, vindictive alarmists who are deliberately using fuzzy science to “trick” unsuspecting “idiots” on the issue of climate change.
The information was obtained from the database of the University of East Anglia in Norwich, England, an institution that was embroiled in another recent scandal after it was forced to admit deleting much of its raw data.
Which is the first rule of science right?
Anyway, officials at the school have acknowledged the authenticity of the emails and documents, which have sparked a furor of the legitimacy of global warming.
The resulting dust-up could prove catastrophic to President Barack Obama (and U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham)’s efforts to impose a massive new energy tax here in America. It could also derail a global climate conference taking place under the auspices of the United Nations in Copenhagen next month.
One email lays bare the political calculation behind the “research” these “scientists” have been conducting.
“The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t,” writes Kevin Trenberth, a climatologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Translation?
“Mr. President, we have a problem.”
Another email explains how to use a “trick” on a chart to “hide the decline” in global temperatures beginning in 1961.
Yet another features an influential member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) promising to “somehow” keep data out of a widely-cited report “even if if we have to redefine what the peer review literature is.”
We’ve always been iffy on the whole climate change thing, of course here in South Carolina, everyone knows that the best way to adopt a position on the issue is to simply take the current temperature …
After all, that’s what the head of the S.C. Wildlife Federation, Clinch Heyward, did … for realsies.









Comments
By Liberty For Me on November 22nd, 2009 at 12:58 am
Fits, why are you such a hater? Why would you want our world to flood and kill bears??….I guess now you are going to say Lindsy Graham is wrong in saying big oil is the reason terrorists have the ability to exist or that the presidents agenda is to gradually get us all on government health insurance…where do you wingnuts come up with these CRAZY ideas?…I swear you act like these facts could actually be true
By Statesman on November 22nd, 2009 at 1:37 am
If all this climate change/global warming stuff was BS, wouldn’t we be hearing it from scientists and not politicians and big business?
By Liberty For Me on November 22nd, 2009 at 1:53 am
Statesman…..you need to do a little rersearch.Most reputible scientists in this field think this is all a scam.Name one credible scientist that has real facts and thinks this is true.All you hear is liberals stating a “fact” that the worlds 100 greatest scientists all agree on this..which is the first big bullshit lie.Then it gets worse from there.
By Liberty For Me on November 22nd, 2009 at 2:02 am
A petition organized by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, which more than 31,000 scientists have signed, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s. The petition says, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate….Its a nice way of saying stop the total bullshit
Its all a total money scam.Its not too hard to see who is in on the money grab…
By Ynot on November 22nd, 2009 at 7:27 am
terrorists belong to the international bankers… think about it.
Everytime there is an incident, insurance money is involved. Huge sums of money change hands. *duh*
We do have climate change. It used to snow more. It used to rain for longer periods in the summer.
Anybody else got a question about all the white lines in the sky everyday?
When I was young, you wore a coat to a football game. The pool was closed due to rainy weeks in the summer. Now we’re lucky to get an afternoon of rain in the heat.
Read about the Russians and Chinese ” seeding clouds” to prevent or cause rain.
Read Scott Stevens the weather guy.
Then, no I don’t believe in global warming. I don’t support cap and trade.
And I do believe Copenhagen is all about establishing Bush I’s ” one world government”, remember the ” thousand points of light” speech?
By larrie on November 22nd, 2009 at 10:46 am
Global warming is just another vehicle for socialists to deny Americans their God-given constitutional rights and freedoms.
By CNSYD on November 22nd, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Of course there is global warming. Al Gore said so. Afterall he invented the internet.
By Lundasoid on November 22nd, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Ouch at the misinformation in this article! Do some freakin fact checking before writing such drivel.
If you don’t think that the Earth is warming, have fun at explaining why 99% of the world’s glaciers are retreating, why all large-scale statistically credible analyses of the temperature record (at least in the journals I read; i.e., ones that include uncertainty margins in their calculations) show warming since 1850, etc. As for why we’re warming, we truly don’t know conclusively yet. But there is increasing evidence that CO_2 has a lot to do with it. Either way, I can assure you that global warming is not an evil concoction of any political party.
Also, please do not misquote Trenberth. I know the asshole quite well and he is simply saying that the last decade did not warm as much as the 1990s (which is true). He’s not saying thay haven’t warmed.
Please, please, do some fact checking before writing.
By Liberty For Me on November 22nd, 2009 at 10:30 pm
Lundasoid…You can assure us???…with your in-depth reading of propaganda??? or your high tech infiltration of the scientific community??
Are you one of the people who said a few years ago we were going into a new iceage??
By 2 cents on November 22nd, 2009 at 10:59 pm
While global warming may be a scam (like Y2K), there is no denying that we need to stop cutting down the rainforests, take every measure to avoid oil spills, develop clean energy, and stop putting toxins in the environment.
Simply put, we need to take better care of the planet we call home and ourselves.
Many are pushing for nuclear energy, but considering Chernobyl & the risks of nuclear development, I don’t think it’s a wise option to pursue.
By Liberty For Me on November 22nd, 2009 at 11:25 pm
2 cents…you kind of have a point..But I really don’t know of anyone that is pro-pollution. You have no education on nuclear power.It is by far one of the safest and cleanest sources to ever be developed.Three mile island and Chernobyl are poor excuses and ancient technology.When is the last time you heard of anything bad about nuclear??France is almost all driven by nuclear power
By General Washington on November 23rd, 2009 at 7:39 am
A hacking incident at the University of East Anglia could be catastrophic for Obama.
Wishing does not make it so.
By Elmer on November 23rd, 2009 at 8:38 am
You know global warming chatter is all smoke and mirrors. Why? Because the believers never have any concise factual evidence. Show me a chart of the last 200 years worth of global temperatures. Put that chart on every article regarding global warming and it is the end of discussion. Carbon emissions have never been higher than the last 10 years. And yet the earth’s temperature has not risen. WTF?
By Mike at the beach on November 23rd, 2009 at 8:52 am
Here’s a shocker- The Sun News (sister rag to la Socialista and equally silly/soon-to-be-irrelevant) runs a rambling, million-column inch piece on global warming top of the fold front page today. The story absolutely, unequivocally affirms that the “capital G” Global Warming ™ industry is fact. No alternate view, no mention of cooling trend in air temps, not even a “denial kook” reference. The reluctant story detailing the leaked/hacked memos? Page 15 down the right column, maybe 8 column-inches. I’m no “denial kook,” nor am I some conspiracy nut, but I am smart enough to see that this was part of a coordinated offensive/damage control piece with which the mainstream media was obviously complicit. Gotta get Cap and Trade/tax rammed through real quick-like before the lemmings figure this thing out! Anyone who believes that the media isn’t biased and agenda driven is the kook here.
By Pat Hendrix on November 23rd, 2009 at 9:43 am
There are almost as many lies as there are words in this post. No surprise coming from the fits crowd. Luckily, lies limp and are easily chased down and clubbed to death.
First, anyone who thinks global warming isn’t real is an idiot. Coming from people who think the world is 4,000 years old, that’s no surprise.
Second, liberty for whatever, those 30k “scientists” include anyone they could find with a BA in science or higher that was capable of using a pen. You know, not scientists. NASA, NOAA, the National Academy of Sciences, the majority of living Nobel Laureates, and pretty much the entire scientific community all agree that it exists. On your side you have Matt Drudge, Jurrassic Prick, the late Michael Crichton, and a handful of paid-for-scientists working for Exxon. Tough choice.
Lastly, the “trick” business has been totally debunked. Here are the scientists explaining it themselves. Warning, the word socialism is never used. Some posters here might want to stay clear.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/#more-1853
By CNSYD on November 23rd, 2009 at 10:10 am
2 cents, now you have LFM and I in rare agreement. Who built and ran Chernobyl? The Soviet Union. How much did they care about human life? I will give you an example. In the cold war Soviets Navy leaders were asked why they put so little personnel radiation shielding in their nuclear subs. They answers were cost, added weight, etc. When pressed as to their concern for the long term effects on their sailors, they replied Russian mothers are producing replacements every hour. Now contrast that with how many were killed at TMI. How many added deaths have been directly sourced to TMI? How many people are dying in France directly sourced to their nuckear industry? Want to have a huge decrease in death rates? Eliminate tobacco and alcohol. Think that will happen?
By Liberty For Me on November 23rd, 2009 at 11:31 am
Pat… Your life must be miserable…sorting out your recyclable trash,taking 3 minute showers,washing the shit off your hands after using one sheet of toilet paper,running to the store to get new (mercury filled) lightbulbs..riding your bike to work..eating a vegetarian menu and waiting everyday for the world to flood,be burned alive or finding a way to row to the arctic to pluck polar bears out of the water.The stress must be unimaginable.I myself just try to find the most freedom I can and be happy…yes,selfishly happy.I believe in Objectivism ..mmHHHHhahaha
By Liberty For Me on November 23rd, 2009 at 11:49 am
CNSYD ..I really don’t understand how you don’t always agree with me…
My only agenda is to be free of government control from so called Democrats and corporatism and war mongering from so called Republicans…Once people understand what they are supporting by progressing party politics maybe then we will all be free and happy…One can only dream of that amount of education…But then again we might have all burned up by then..LOL
By dirtbogger on November 23rd, 2009 at 12:33 pm
The Cap and Trade tax should be voluntary that way if we don’t buy into the bullshit we dont have to pay. Pat you could just send me $200 a month and I would turn my water heater off for 30 min a day if you want to feel like you are doing your part to stop global warming.
By Pat Hendrix on November 23rd, 2009 at 3:10 pm
Dirtbogger,
You have running water?
By Lundasoid on November 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Its times like this when I want to move far away from redneck fucks like “Liberty for Me”.
Answer the question: why the hell would 99% of the glaciers on earth be retreating if it has not been warming?
I assume you know what ice is and what causes it to melt?
I also comment that the answer will not involve god, political parties, or the Bible.
By Liberty For Me on November 24th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Lundasoid….people who have no real basis for their silly arguments resort to name calling…You quote bogus propaganda as fact and when people use common sense you attack…Its OK I was a teen once..Have you not read the news about this article…or do you only absorb what you want to hear?