Sarah Palin Is Whining (Yet Again)

By fitsnews • on November 18, 2009
Comment Print

sarah palin whining m

Sarah Palin just can’t win for losing with us … which we attribute to the fact that the GOP diva (currently in the midst of a major nationwide PR offensive) has become sadly emblematic of America’s anally PC, excessively-dramatic, “oh pretty pretty please offend me ’cause I’m dying to be offended” streak.

Seriously, people.  It’s like Palin is addicted to hearing herself whine – which we suppose is now par for the course in our Reality TV-addled culture, but nonetheless it’s not the sort of quality you’d expect to see exhibited so consistently from a professional politician.

We first noticed Palin’s proclivity for complaining back in January of this year, when she vindictively lit into the veracity of new media.

Of course, we noted at the time that we still wanted to make out with her … which we’d like to make perfectly clear remains true today.

After the blogger whinefest, though, there was Palin’s sanctimoniously-overplayed tit-for-tat with late night talk show host David Letterman, which ended well for her but once again showcased her whiny streak.

Also, it’s been noted that Palin’s new book, Going Rogue, devotes a disproportionate amount of ink to rehashing the insider battles that took place between her and certain members of former GOP presidential nominee John McCain’s staff during their disastrous 2008 campaign.

Enough already! Who cares!

Anyway, the latest example of Palin’s thin skin can be found on her Facebook page, where the former Alaska governor took fingers to keyboard to bash Newsweek magazine’s choice of a cover photo for this story.

The picture Newsweek chose should be familiar to FITS readers, as it is one of several that was taken for a Runner’s World magazine feature that we chronicled back in July.

In fact, here it is (click on thumbnail for a larger view …)

palin-run5

No big deal, right?

Wrong, according to Palin.

“The choice of photo for the cover of this week’s Newsweek is unfortunate,” Palin wrote to her 1 million-plus supporters. “When it comes to Sarah Palin, this ‘news’ magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner’s World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness — a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation.”

Sheesh.  But Palin wasn’t finished.

“The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now,” she continued. “If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention – even if out of context.”

Wait … what? Sexist?

Please, Sarah.  Learn to pick your battles, girlfriend.

And while we hate siding with Newsweek over anybody with stems like Palin’s, the fact is that this picture was already published months earlier … and Palin had no problem whatsoever with it.

Sure, the argument is that such a laid back picture doesn’t fit the image she wants projected on a “news” magazine cover, but again – who cares?

For her to file such a “context” complaint now is ridiculous, and ironically makes us take her less seriously (no matter what she’s wearing).

Besides, when Palin runs around in smokin’ hot stripper boots and naughty monkey pumps, how exactly is she telling us that she wants to be perceived?

Live by the sexy, die by the sexy – just ask our founding editor.

Don’t get us wrong, Palin has done well lately in our book on the ideological front – making a gutsy endorsement in an Upstate New York Congressional race that nearly dealt the two-party establishment a stunning defeat.  But that positive ideological lean will be worth absolutely nothing unless Palin is able to locate a mute button for her whining.

fitsfinger

Match.com

Comments

By theo on November 18th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

The illegally snatched picture from Runner’s World was an attempt to portray Palin as sleezy and cheap.

The AP has over 9 full-time “investigative journalists” dissecting Palin’s new book in the name of “fact checking.”

The AP didn’t bother to fact check Biden’s or Obama’s books.

Gimme a break!

Sarah leaves liberals quaking in their boots.

She’s middle America.

She’s attractive.

She’s articulate.

She espouses coservative values.

Unabashedly.

Liberals see that she really connects with the Middle America demographic.

Why else would liberals spend so much money attempting to smear and marginalize Palin?

By Genomic Repairman on November 18th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

Sweet Hay-Suse man, I don’t think I can take this crap until 2012. Seriously when does hunting season start so she will retreat into the woods and we can be left alone from having to hear about her shorts. Biotch be happy you don’t have cottage cheese legs or varicose veins and move on. This might be a message that society finds your legs more appealing than your politics.

By Liberty For Me on November 18th, 2009 at 4:12 pm

I agree with her its a dirty trick…but..I am tired of hearing about her.

By vicupstate on November 18th, 2009 at 4:19 pm

Honestly, how can anyone take Sarah Palin seriously? If she had kept herself in Alaska, and actually GOVERNED in difficult times rather than quit for the bright lights of Hollywood, I would have respected her as someone with a future in politics.

She is nothing but a great body/face spouting platitudes as policy. She is an empty pantsuit folks. Alaska gets like $1.84 for every $1 they pay in taxes, and she preaches about socialism.

Wake up.

By OnNoNotAgain on November 18th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

“Don’t get us wrong, Palin has done well lately in our book on the ideological front – making a gutsy endorsement in an Upstate New York Congressional race that nearly dealt the two-party establishment a stunning defeat.”

Nearly dealt the two-party establishment a stunning defeat? Her and Jeri hnded a rock-solid GOP house district, sign sealed and delivered with cookies on top to the Democrats.

Nice spin. Very astute spin.

By OnNoNotAgain on November 18th, 2009 at 4:48 pm

But yeah. Nice gams.

By Heidi on November 18th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

All you putzes — this Sarah Palin Overload would not EVEN be an issue had she not been pelted and squelched by the media, who speaks for the ass-stupid American public. We would be seeing Hillary in her jogging shorts if she weren’t Secretary of State.

Face it: John McCain created a monster.

Monsters are vengeful.

By Old Bike Dude on November 18th, 2009 at 6:44 pm

She whines until she gets the hot beef injection from OBD. Then she’s all smiles.

By Liberty For Me on November 18th, 2009 at 6:47 pm

Hillary in a jogging suit….hmmmm..does she even have ankles??LOL

By ohara on November 18th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

Hey, just because that picture makes her thighs look fat, is no reason to complain-unless you’re Sarah Palin. That obviously gives her the right to complain about how sexist her previously approved photo op is.

To quote the Irish Times from 2008: “If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.”

By Heidi on November 18th, 2009 at 7:03 pm

Like I said — “All you PUTZES”

By sahara on November 18th, 2009 at 8:17 pm

Sara Palin needs to spend more time with her teenage children, who are obviously not abstaining from sex, and assure they don’t get pregnant anymore. She needs to stop talking about family values and being a good parent, and actually spend some time with her family, which is in crisis. When she does that, then I will recognize her as a legitimate conservative and person of substance. Until then, she is just another attention-seeking, ego-driven politician, self-centered politician.

By lauren on November 18th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

Sarah,
Look how Reagan’s kids turned out. Sometimes, great leaders make sacrifices for their country–including time with their kids . Sadly the best leaders aren’t necessarily the best parents to their own children.

By Pam on November 19th, 2009 at 12:04 am

The question that I want an interviewer to ask her is ‘How do you define rogue?’ I’m betting that she doesn’t know the real definition of the word.

Main Entry: 1rogue
Pronunciation: \?r?g\
Function: noun
Etymology: origin unknown
Date: 1561
1 : vagrant, tramp
2 : a dishonest or worthless person : scoundrel
3 : a mischievous person : scamp
4 : a horse inclined to shirk or misbehave
5 : an individual exhibiting a chance and usually inferior biological variation

By baker on November 19th, 2009 at 7:15 am

Is Lauren including Sarah Palin among the “best leaders”?

By TotalWench on November 19th, 2009 at 8:57 am

Yes, she’s pretty and she is in great shape. But if you don’t want pictures ‘taken out of context’ or used by the wrong people for the wrong purpose, DON’T LET THEM BE TAKEN.

Another example of whiny, pathetic conservatives whining about how the world won’t kiss their asses. Move on.

By dirtbogger on November 19th, 2009 at 9:23 am

She has to put so much effort just to speak (like Obama), is she stupid or lieing most of the time?

By bigbubba on November 19th, 2009 at 10:46 am

dirtbogger….both

By RedBank Bar on November 19th, 2009 at 3:49 pm

Sarah Palin, serial liar.

AP has over 4100 reporters. NINE would represent what percentage of that?

By scooter on November 19th, 2009 at 10:09 pm

Palin acts like someone who is brain dead. Sad thing, I do not think she ever had much sense. She is not pretty, and she certainly is not smart. I can not believe that anyone takes her seriously. She is the biggest joke in the vastly insane right wing.

By Pelion Potentate on November 19th, 2009 at 10:47 pm

RedBank: Yes, AP has 4,100 reporters, but there are 535 members of Congress, 50 governors, and thousands of mayors and other elected officials. Sarah is a private citizen. Do the math.

By Genomic Repairman on November 20th, 2009 at 9:30 am

Pelion, when you are out campaigning for folks making public speeches and whoring your book out, I think you tend cease being a private citizin.

Leave a Comment