Charleston Republicans Censure Graham
It’s not just those kooky, Bible-thumpin’ Upstate S.C. Republicans …
On Monday night, Republicans from moderate, laid-back (and environmentally-friendly) Charleston, S.C. got into the act, formally censuring U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham for a litany of offenses, including his support of a so-called “pro-environmental” bill.
Yet while the censure resolution focused significant attention on Graham’s partnership with left-wing Democrats on a “Cap & Trade” energy tax hike, Charleston Republicans also included several strongly-worded personal criticisms aimed at the “third Senator from New York.”
“Lindsey Graham continues to hold the Republican Party hostage and undermines Republican leadership and party solidarity for his own benefit,” the resolution reads. It then notes that Graham “continues to weaken the Republican brand and tarnish the ideals of freedom, rule of law, and fiscal conservatism.”
Here is the complete text of the censure resolution as provided to FITS:
Whereas, U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (SC) and John Kerry (MA) have called for a bipartisan bill dealing with “climate change” via a “Cap & Trade” energy bill;
Whereas, the basis of Cap & Trade – global warming caused by carbon emissions – is still in doubt as evidenced by the past decade of cooling temperatures;
Whereas, the people of South Carolina can ill afford the job-killing Cap & Trade bill’s ripple effects on our state’s economy and on personal energy bills;
Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham supported TARP and has shown a willingness to discuss nationalizing U.S. banking institutions;
Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham has shown a condescending attitude toward his constituents by calling them “bigots” when they oppose his stance on amnesty for illegal aliens;
Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham has stated on many occasions that his primary concern is to “be relevant”;
Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham continues to hold the Republican Party hostage and undermines Republican leadership and party solidarity for his own benefit by joining the “Gang of 10″ and the “Gang of 14″;
Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham – in the name of bipartisanship – continues to weaken the Republican brand and tarnish the ideals of freedom, rule of law, and fiscal conservatism.
Therefore, let it be resolved: The Charleston County Republican Party Executive Committee respectfully requests, with sincere sadness that the South Carolina Republican Party withdraw their resolution commending U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham and that the Charleston Country Republican Party censure U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham for many of the positions he has taken that do not represent the wishes of the people of Charleston County SC, such as: passing a “Cap & Trade” energy bill, bailing out banks, and granting amnesty for illegal aliens.
Wow … don’t hold back, Charleston!
Anyway, this is not the first time Graham has been censured by a local Republican Party. In 2007, the Greenville GOP censured Graham for his position on illegal immigration.
As FITS has noted in previous posts, Graham has clearly been spoiling for a fight with the party’s fiscal conservative wing for months now.
Looks like he’s got it …
Loading ...
Comments
By Genomic Repairman on November 10th, 2009 at 1:48 am
WTF happened to the party of smaller govt, less regulation, and term limits. Oh that’s right, a second term. Power corrupts and eventually they die in office like Strom (God bless the senile ole racist with a hankering for the dark meat), bang a hooker in a cemetary (classy mofo), or bang a so-so MILF in one of the Latin American countries on the tax payer dime (ding ding, we have a winner). Maybe the GOP out to focus on making candidates for Congress sign a pledge for term limits as a pseudocontract with the electorate. Or maybe the voters could grow some from fruit to fill up the Crown Royal bag and vote these deadwood knobs out of office.
By Katy on November 10th, 2009 at 4:57 am
I like Graham, and I think he’s a good image for the state. Most people don’t like him simply because he isn’t a wing-nut.
By Red Bank Bar on November 10th, 2009 at 6:04 am
Shrink that Party, Repugnants! Little Lindsey speaks a little truth to fools and they can’t handle it. Luddites and Bigots, but, in all fairness, LL had it right. Angry Bubbas and Stupid too.
By Ynot on November 10th, 2009 at 6:54 am
Censures are apparantly worthless but nevertheless it’s nice people are noticing that Graham has sold us out.
By Red on November 10th, 2009 at 8:36 am
This makes me proud to be from Charleston. Hell yes it’s about time we rode this big spending traitor out of town.
By Liberty For Me on November 10th, 2009 at 8:42 am
You left off ..F@ck him on your poll
By memee on November 10th, 2009 at 8:45 am
Dems are wetting their breeches. They don’t understand how their socialistic policies are worsening unemployment. They don’t understand why middle America is suddenly rejecting their statism.
I am really looking forward to the midterm elections in 2010.
By Heidi on November 10th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Who worked up this poll?
There are more than a couple of viable “options” missing…
By Harold on November 10th, 2009 at 10:42 am
Man, I am loving this.
This long time Republican say Screw Graham!
By Brandon on November 10th, 2009 at 10:46 am
Is there no way we can recall him? I have combed through the state constitution and find nothing.
By Reality Check on November 10th, 2009 at 11:14 am
Senator Grahamnesty doesn’t care what the voters think. They can censure him all they want but due to his recent re-election, Graham is going to do whatever he so pleases. Don’t expect change from this RINO anytime soon.
By Workin' Tommy C on November 10th, 2009 at 11:21 am
Wait a minute!
There are a few other counties that can do this!
Great text in the resolution! Nailed him! Especially this part:
“Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham has shown a condescending attitude toward his constituents by calling them “bigots” when they oppose his stance on amnesty for illegal aliens;”
And this one:
“Whereas, U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham continues to hold the Republican Party hostage and undermines Republican leadership and party solidarity for his own benefit . . . “
By Nathan Earle on November 10th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Brandon,
There is currently no way to recall federal officials. We get one shot every 6 years with Lindsey, and we just blew it last year. This man can do whatever he wants for the next four years before he has to start behaving himself again.
Of course, this is the “conservative” state that loved Inez so much that it gave us Jim Rex. Go figure.
By Liberty For Me on November 10th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Red Bank Bar..Are you gay and unattractive??.You have so much unfocused anger,just like Rosie O’Donnell.Most Americans want to be free.That is what this country is about.If you want socialism the world is full of countries that should make you happy..Cuba is just 70 miles from Florida.
Things you say never have a base ,just random BS and hatred..just like all the progressives (now they call themselves)..which is socialist.If you can’t admit to what you are ..shut up!!..I am proud to be a Libertarian
By shay on November 10th, 2009 at 11:52 am
memee: Dems ARE wetting their breeches .. with joy, because as incompetent as they are, the Republicans are even less competent — and continue to splinter themselves into smaller and smaller, crazier and crazier factions. The Charleston sanction could have been dreamed up by the Dems …
By Go Figure on November 10th, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Crimes of Graham’s:
*Joining Gang of 14 that produced two conservative Supreme Court justices in exchange for pulling down Appeals Court nominees who were never going to make it anyway.
*Calling for the (successful) surge in Iraq long before Bush
* Calling Rumsfeld on the carpet for his failings when no other Republican would
* Not being a Bush synchophant
* Calling for energy independence in a country that imports 70% of its oil and has no existing energy policy
Yep, sounds like grounds for censure.
By David O on November 10th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
He is not the third Senator from New York. New York only has 2 Senators. Grahamesty became the third Senator from Arizona when he married John McCain.
By thelibertytest on November 10th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Sen. Grahamnisty ignored censure before and he will again. It is high time for a SC constitutional amendment that allows for recalls of treasonous non-reps such as Graham.
By D in North Augusta on November 10th, 2009 at 1:01 pm
Censuring Mr Graham is fine…..but what about this…..a good ‘ol fashion South Carolina done-by-the-lawbook RECALL of that geezer????????
By political hack on November 10th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
I commend the good folks in Charleston on this one. It goes to show they still have not sold their souls completely to affirmative action socialist progressives such as those Graham supports. It is clear from Graham’s intentions he plans to get SC into the Green racket with his support of “crap and trade” and it seems to be the right move politically if you go back to memee’s comment about how “dems don’t understand what they are doing in terms of spending and keeping unemployment high,” and these representatives, who are supposed to be smarter than most of us and represent our best interests, don’t have a basic understanding of Econ 101? Obviously this is not the case, as the science of Economics is the most important when it comes to setting policy for a NATION state. But since we are not a NATION anymore than we are a borderless COLONY run by our banking cartel, they why not keep the racket going when you can promise your consituents that if they by GE and go green, they will make billions of dollars, no matter how much it hurts the average CONSUMER (which is what progressives see us as mostly, we are not CITIZENS or RESIDENTS) by inflating their dollar and keeping them under the Hammer of illegitimate taxes. The fact of the matter is that it is a plan, and the purpose is to take economic theory not from free market capitalists, but to take it from Karl Marx.
By Rufus on November 10th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
Go figure,
Lindsey deserves censure and more. Your “reasons” for supporting Lindsey are pretty weak at best.
If the surge in iraq was so dam successful, let’s bring all the troops and the private war profiteering contractors home now. Lindsey sure doesnt support that now, does he? Maybe we need 3 or 4 more successful surges in order to come home? Lindsey supported invading Iraq,which any rational voter now knows was an unncessary war trumped up on bs charges.
You mention Lindsey is calling for energy independence. Wow whee!!! What has he done about it? Name me one politician who will say he is not for energy independence?
By David O on November 10th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
Dear fitsnews. Please change your clock to DST.
By RedBank Bar on November 10th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
There’s no anger here, Liberty Boy, I’m extremely happy with YOUR President, mine, too. Im even happier at the circle y’all have formed for a firing squad y’all wingnuts are using to thin the ranks. Repugs are now a regional party with 90% angry bubbas.
Little Lindsey may be light in the loafers but he’ll kick the arse of anyone y’all propeller beanies put up against him.
I doubt anyone on this reactionary web site is a real Libertarian. Not too many of y’all wingnuts think there should be no laws against prostitution, drug usage, or pornography. Most of y’all are chickenhawks too, ready to send US troops anywhere in the world to die but damned few of y’all would ever serve. Libertarians would vehemently oppose both the Iraq war-of-choice started by Junior Bush and the continued war supporting a corrupt regime in Afghanistan.
By sid on November 10th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
I think I feel most sorry for RBB’s keyboard. It never gets to produce anything even remotely intelligent or insightful, then gets pounded to oblivion as RBB expells all that anger he/she feels towards anyone who does not march in lock-step to the lefty agenda he/she worships. Not to mention the thought of where those fingers have been. Probably angrily probing every imaginable (not to mention some unimaginable) orifice until the “inspiration” strikes him/her to launch another rambling, ranting, poorly written missive. Please, RBB, for the sake of your poor keyboard, stop proving to the world you are just as stupid as it thinks you are. You may not care, but your keyboard is suffering.
By Liberty For Me on November 10th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
RDB…..You proved my point with your name calling.Your wrong about me and mine.You are not Liberterian unless you are for Liberty..that means freedom to do what you want unless it harms someone else.Drugs,sex,MONEY, whatever..and to mind your own business and not attack someone unless a war has been confirmed.Anyone who wants the government to control them can leave this country as far as I am concerned.Why try to ruin this one when you have such a smorgasboard of socialism around the world.Lindsey Graham is a socialist as much as Obama and so are you if you support them…so just admit it!!…You wont…But you are either for socialism or against it.But your convictions are not very strong when you wont admit what you are..But you are a chicken for sure
By RedBank Bar on November 10th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Ole Sidney’s still sore from being exposed as a know-nothing who has no self-awareness.
Liberty Boy is another case. Ignorant, but at least, by appearances, intellectually honest. I doubt he can define “socialism”. I’ll bet his parents/and/or grandparents are all happily drawing social security benefits and being on Medicare. I’ll also wager he hasn’t tried to talk them out of drawing their benefits to satisfy his ideology of ignorance.
You’re both angry bubbas which makes me happy. Shrink that Party, boys! Tea Party all y’all want and Democrats will love y’all forever.
By smart Kid Grant on November 10th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
I was there, it was an awesome and awe-inspiring occurrence.
By CNSYD on November 10th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
You guys are a trip. What we need are two dumb ass Senators like Demented who will never accomplish anything because none of the rest of the Senate will give them the time of day. NOT! Graham is smart enough to see that if you want to shape legislation you have to be a participant in the process. Standing on the outside and railing gets you nothing. You can’t make trades if you refuse to trade anything.
By ethel krabitz on November 10th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
too bad we’re stuck with Lindsay the Lovely for five or 6 more years. Hope he enjoys them – they will surely be his last.
Obama is a pathetic joke.
Lindsay has become one, too.
By Go Figure on November 10th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
Rufus -
What has he done for energy independence? Well, for starters, how about calling for more domestic oil drilling and nuclear power in the column he wrote with Kerry. Politics is the art of the possible. You don’t get everything you want in exchange for nothing in return; especially when you have only 40 votes.
The GOP used to be the party of conservationists. Now Theodore Roosevelt couldn’t win a Republican primary b/c he would be labled an “environmentalist whacko” by Rush Limbaugh. Wonder why the GOP is getting wiped out in elections in affluent suburbs (and almost lost it’s Charleston Congressional seal last year) look no further than this issue.
By WSloane on November 10th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Go Figure,
Charleston almost lost the congressional seat last year because of Graham and Brown. Brown is a classic unapologetic earmarker bent on expending the government as is Graham.
The entire down ticket took a hit because of these two jokers.
It is high time the GOP regain some of its integrity back and fought for conservatives.
Conservation is a wonderful goal but not at the cost of freedom.
By Soft Sigh From Hell on November 10th, 2009 at 6:33 pm
SC Libertarian = a Republican who is (1) too embarrassed to admit it, especially with Bush and now in national defeat, or (2) a conservative pothead. Nationally there is another type: a kook who thinks all regulation is bad, who wouldn’t inspect food, approve medicines, or even require licenses of surgeons or airline pilots. We don’t see too many of the last in SC fortunately, at least outside of college Libertarian clubs.
By CNSYD on November 10th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
Soft Sigh From Hell, how dare you inject logic in this discussion and call a spade a spade.
By Frequent Flyer on November 10th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Landslide against Grahamerry!
By Old Bike Dude on November 10th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
All this proves is that SCANA has spent a little money within the Exec Comm of the Chas Cty Rep party. So what else is new?
So let me get the scorecard right, the republicans now love the insurance companies, big oil, imported oil, and abortion doctor killers.
I keep reminding you that upstate republicans are all RINO’s. To them being republican just keeps them from having to vote for the same candidate that is backed by the black folk. Along the coast the republican comeheres have convinced ol’ bubba that it’s the right thing to do. Of course in the midlands it’s strictly a Klan thing.
By Rufus on November 10th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
Soft sigh from Hell,
A SC libertarian is no different than any other libertarian. Regrettably, in SC ,standing up for the Constitution, sound money, a small federal government,balanced budgets, and personal liberty results in being called a pothead or a low life who voted for Bush. I would suggest you stop branding folks with main stream media labels and sort out the values you want to see in the USA.
What Lindsey and others do not grasp is that the libertarian ideas from the Constitution supporting the free market over central planning are what made this country great.
Bailing out banks(because they supposedly are too big to fail)with taxpayer money and doubling the money supply of fiat money would never have even been dreamed of by the Founding Fathers. Whatever you want to brand Lindsey, it isn’t a conservative.
By ohara on November 10th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Gotta love the SC GOP. Too chicken sh*t to impeach or censure Sanford (they had to be drug & beaten within an inch of their lives to take any kind of action after he went AWOL for a hot tango date) but they’ll go after light loafers in a NY minute.
On second thought, he’s best friends with whinin’ Joe Lieberman, so yeah, go get ‘em.
By Liberty For Me on November 10th, 2009 at 11:27 pm
Red Bank…Don’t worry about my definition.A dictionary is a click away if you don’t understand it.So you are not socialist ???It is a very simple question even for you..You are so intellectually dishonest.
By Liberty For Me on November 10th, 2009 at 11:32 pm
Definition: Socialist..One who can not stand on their principles.They can only try to attack or fault others.
Libeterian..One who stands for freedom and liberty for all without attacking others..and proud to say who he is and what he stands for
WHAT DO YOU STAND FOR!!!!!?????
By Soft Sigh From Hell on November 11th, 2009 at 8:22 am
I define local and regional “libertarians” by what they appear to be in large measure, after what I believe to be fair and prolonged inspection or observation of that herd.
Just because the observed (and perhaps simply more loudmouthed) libertarian differs from the professed beliefs of others claiming the title is no surprise and changes nothing.
The differentiation is akin to Fit’s branding of RINO on certain Republicans. That is the inside view. From the outside they are all Republicans. Officially they are all Republicans.
Many and perhaps most proclaimed libertarians are embarrassed Republicans, drug-loving conservatives, or loopy kooks.
By Tom Degan on November 11th, 2009 at 8:26 am
A party by any other name would whither and die….
And speaking of names, folks: why don’t they just rename themselves the “Tea Party” and be done with it. This is certainly not the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt.
Is it the goal of these clowns that they destroy the GOP in order that it may be rebuilt in their hideous image? If that is the case they’re in for more-than-a-few surprises. That silly party is already “in their image”. Are they serious when they imply that they wish to move it even further to the right? How “far right” can one move before one falls off of the face of the earth? Are they serious?
Watching the utter implosion of the Grand Old Party in the last year has been the gift that just keeps giving and giving. Someone pinch me!
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
By Workin' Tommy C on November 11th, 2009 at 8:51 am
Ohara:
Is your short-term memory gone?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/06/south-carolina-gop-censur_n_226728.html
Sanford WAS censured. Several counties, including the libertarian-leaning chairman from Lexington Co. GOP, Rich Bolen, voted to demand that Sanford step down–an action I and many other libertarian-Constitutionalists (who are also in the party here) supported.
Sanford threw himself under the bus. I promote the policy of “avoiding entangling personalities.” It’s all about the mission and one’s record of accomplishment as well as having a Constitutional political philosophy when it comes to politicians.
We’re apparently a lot more cynical of politics and politicians than liberals in general.
What was it P.T. Barnum said–”There’s a liberal born every minute?”
By iDoNotLikeLindsayGrahm on November 11th, 2009 at 9:50 am
What would it take to Recall Lindsey Grahm and replace him.
By political hack on November 11th, 2009 at 10:12 am
I believe it is better to be a pot smoking libertarian than a pot smoking liberal. Even if the libertarian is a Republican in denial the THC has allowed him to see through the smoke and mirrors that the government and main stream media has spoon fed him his entire life; while the liberal believes in “The American Way” that is continuing to be spoon fed him via the gay mafia and reality TV backed MSM and that the United States is good because we are a nation that FEELs like doing the right thing. Appears the THC for the liberal makes him much more easily tamed and accepting of the racket in front of him that he has to pay the tab for. It is true that liberals love to bring in the argument of how our parents and grandparents are dirty socialists because they use Medicare/Medicaid and bring in Social Security. A famous judge from Mt. Pleasant, Judge Falcon Hawkins, once said that everyone is a Democrat because we all pay social security. I fully believe the judge was correct in his statement, however, we are all mandated at birth to be given social security numbers, given we aren’t illegals, so we then become the property of the government and are insurance for its continuous follies; the key component in the “full faith and credit” clause that the GSE’s and Federal Reserve use to further their socialist schemes. The idea that because we should all be socialist Democrats because we are born into serfdom by our government and should continue to promote such neo-fuedalism is not PROGRESSIVE and is not the American way. It seems the reach of oligarchs and monarchs is as present today as it was 300 years ago; namely because they haven’t lost their wealth, only found new ways to gain it, through manipulative radical socialist/communist regimes, and wonderful media technology at their fingertips to keep their serfs drooling on themselves all the while their liberty is slowly taken away just like their spirit under the burdens omnipresent inflationary debt brought on them by the central bankers behind the green curtain.
By Liberty For Me on November 11th, 2009 at 10:50 am
All of you people who are trying to put people into boxes have no credibility because you wont admit to your own beliefs..My definition again stands up ..Socialists are ones to attack and yet never admit to their own flag……humorous hypocrisy.You people are a joke..
By Huhhh??? on November 11th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Oh yeah, The Thomas Ravenel branch chimes in.
By Joe on November 11th, 2009 at 11:53 am
Katy, wake up. Graham is a wing nut. A left wing nut….when …. and a right wing nut….again when he thinks it’s prudent to keep him in office. This is the worst kind of wing nut. The kind that has no principles. That is why people don’t like him. Most sensible people don’t like someone without principles.
By Yoda on November 11th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
Maybe you just don’t like Lindsey because maybe Linda Ketner was right?
By ohara on November 11th, 2009 at 2:51 pm
To Workin’ Tommy C:
Go back & read it again-I wrote that they had to be drug & beaten within a inch of their lives before they did anything, meaning, aka, sic, ie, CENSURE. The RNC told him he was O-U-T of national politics the day he gave his first soap-opera confession on national tv.
And BTW-I think Sanfraud has outspent ANY politician in the country on personal excesses. Gave carpetgaggin’ a whole new meaning.
By Patriot on November 11th, 2009 at 9:51 pm
Way to Charleston Republican party, Linsey is a enemy of the U.S. Constitution & Bill Of Rights and he hates freedom. He must not be re-elected, and we all must wake up and realize that there is only one party in the U.S. that is the Corporation&Banker Party.
By Ron on November 11th, 2009 at 10:30 pm
County GOP executive committees across SC should follow suit in a show of solidarity in censuring RINO Shamnesty Sen Graham. He doesn’t even seem to care what his constituents think on issues. He basically told the SC GOP Convention of 2009 that “you can’t reelect me”. In other words he believes that to be reelected, he must represent moderates and liberals across SC. That was an absolute “slap in face” to Conservative Republicans across SC. Greenville censured this rascal last year, and now Charleston has seen the need to do so as well. In a show of solidarity, County GOP committees across the state should in my view take a vote of “no confidence” in this outspoken RINO REPUBLICAN. He’s basically said to conservatives that “what you think doesn’t matter to me.”
I’d like to thank Charleston and Greenville County Republican GOP committees for having the courage and fortitude to stand up to the arrogance and sheer disregard by Sen Graham to what Conservatives in SC believe concerning issues like “cap and tax” and “Obamacare”. He’s “off the GOP reservation” and has been for some time.
Ron
Summerville, SC
By Jeff on November 12th, 2009 at 8:00 am
Heard several at the Charleston GOP meeting saying Bill Connor should run against Leftsey Graham in 2014. He gave quite a ringing talk against RINOs and career politicians earlier that night.
Not sure how well Connor would do but he surely would shift that office back to conservative.
There’s just no enough people in South Carolina that understand how Leftsey has pulled the wool over their eyes. Educating them will take time. We have 4 years to that campaign season and should make the most of it.
By Soft Sigh From Hell on November 12th, 2009 at 8:09 am
I personally am going to enjoy watching more years of Graham poking a sharp stick in eyes of the farther GOP fringers. If worse came to worst and the fringers prevented his renomination he could run as an independent a la Lieberman and either get in or get a Democrat elected. The GOP fringers are impotent here and can do naught but make noise. Though admittedly they are long adept at that. Graham pretty well represents or reflects South Carolina as a whole or on average. The fringers can take their delight with DeMint.
By Red Bank Bar on November 12th, 2009 at 9:27 am
Bull Connor, now that’s a laugh-a-minute. A REMF if there ever was one.
No one he served with in Afghanistan will stand up with him because he is such a self-promoting joke. He may be able to pull rank and bully some to sign a poster board, but no one will stand at the mike and tell what a great leader by example he was.
By A9.twlvr on November 12th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
Could it be that the somnambulant SC republicans are finally waking up? Only time will tell. The sad thing is that Mr. “You lie” from the third district holds almost the same voting record as Sen. Gramnesty, but enjoys a much higher popularity. Does the third district have the same love of the constitution?
By Concerned For SC on November 12th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
haha Red Bank Bar, no surprise someone of your ilk comes to Leftseys defense and slams a conservative.
It’s also no surprise you wouldn’t want to see Bill Connor in that seat or any other. That would hurt you and your liberalistas terribly.
Trackbacks