Comments on: Arkansas’ Mallett Bashes Gamecocks

By: Rapine

Rapine — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:45:46 +0000

Lou Holtz, Steve Spurrier . . .

The University of South Carolina: “Where legends come to die, decompose and stink up the state even worse.”

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:22:46 +0000

LSU has financial and physical plant resources that USC can only dream of, and it’s a much better recruiting base.

Fact is, USC is a historic .500 team. The program, this decade, is playing far above its average.

Take heart USC fans, these are your halcyon days!

By: CNSYD

CNSYD — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:15:57 +0000

pee my pants laughing, your comparison of SC to LA in regard to college football is incorrect. Although Tulane is the other Division 1A prgram in LA, they are no threat to LSU in regard to talent as their academic standards would not allow them to take many of the players who get into LSU. LA’s proximity to East Texas and especially Houston gives LSU a fertile recruiting area with less competition whereas USC bumps heads with UGA, Auburn, Clemson, FSU, Tennesse, etc. for talent in Georgia.

LSU has a reputation for loose admittance standards in particular for LA residents. All of this are possible reasons for LSU success on the gridiron.

By: Augustadog

Augustadog — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:05:52 +0000

Spurrier should be toast aftervthis year.

By: pee my pants laughing

pee my pants laughing — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:35:53 +0000

Andrew,
Louisiana has the same population, demographics, income levels, etc. as South Carolina, yet LSU has won 3 national championships, two in the last few years.

Find another excuse.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:44:58 +0000

The past five seasons under Spurrier have been the best consecutive five years in Gamecock football.

That alone illustrates the inept suckitude that is Gamecock football.

Look, USC in the SEC pecking order, is another Mississippi State – lovable losers who will never compete at the top level beyond a season, where USC has depth and some breaks in the schedule.

Coaching is overrated. USC, athletic wise, is a poor school, in a poor, low population state. Consistently finishing 7-5 or so, is about the best the Gamecocks have to hope for.

By: 1 + 1 = 3

1 + 1 = 3 — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:18:49 +0000

After what RR did to him at Michigan, Mallett deserves a good season…kid is playing for pride…his.

By: pee my pants laughing

pee my pants laughing — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:06:13 +0000

Hey Fools,

“best offensive schemes in college football…” Ha ha ha ha ha aha ha ah aha aha ha hahahahahahahahahhahaha..

you’re killing me… ha ha ha ha ha aha ha

“..undersizes SC…..”

ha ha ha ha
you must not be able to read a roster. they are teh same size as everyone else in the conference, except in the heart.

By: CNSYD

CNSYD — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:24:25 +0000

You’re a bunch of fools, USC and the schools you mention have the same number of scholarships available. From Holtz to Spurrier you are looking at 10 years. So how in that period could USC not stock the roster? Maybe if fans would stop buying the “ratings” of Kornblut over coaches whose jobs actually depend on their choices you might do better.

By: Beentheredoneit

Beentheredoneit — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:08:01 +0000

Garcia is in over his head, If he were able to get control of his passing arm perhaps things would be better. He probably will not make it to the next level (NFL) because thus far he has not been able to transition from high school to college level play.