Comments on: Course Correction?

By: sid

sid — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:30:45 +0000

I guess you really are as stupid as your posts indicate. Not because you don’t get this whole thing. I’m pretty sure you do. But the idea that you think others would believe your ridiculous rants from your lefty talking points (other than other lefties, of course) is really quite amusing.

Of course, nobody was ever concerned about fictional names being registered. That’s the red herring you’ve been instructed to parrot. It’s the names of real people who may have died, or moved, or are having their identity stolen that are of concern. I’d try to explain to you the concept of how registration fraud leads to vote fraud, but I know you are either too stupid or too blind to understand or accept it.

The icing on your delusional cake is the concept you state that ACORN is being victimized. Yes, that’s why the organization is going down in flames. Because it is the victim of some crazy conspiracy. You may want to check your pulse, because I don’t believe it is possible for someone with such limited brain activity to sustain a heartbeat. You obviously cannot sustain an intelligent thought.

By: RedBank Bar

RedBank Bar — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:23:52 +0000

Uh, Sidney…. Did your sitter not read my posts and the cnn.com articles to you?

The CNN article YOU posted confirmed my multiple prior posts. VOTER FRAUD is a Repugnant Party and delusional dumb arse like you M Y T H.

I’ll repeat it and type slower for you…..M Y T H.

Mickey Mouse may register but rat boy hasn’t shown up to vote EVER. Your posts confirm either your inability to read, comprehend, or analyze the English language OR confirm you’re just a moron.

ACORN is the victim of voter registration fraud. They’re paying people to register real voters and they’re being victimized. Sidney, can you understand the concept? MICKEY AND MINNIE aren’t showing up to vote.

Geez, it’s exasperating, but somebody’s got to educate wingnuts like you.

By: sid

sid — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:51:05 +0000

Wow! You really are delusional, RBB. Here’s just one example, from Washington:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/22/voter.fraud/index.html

There are other cases pending, and considering the volume of the allegations, only a fool (or an intentionally blind liberal, which is really the same thing) would think that all that smoke really means…what…water?

Your light, already dim, is growing dimmer every time you post.

By: Red Bank Bar

Red Bank Bar — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:51:11 +0000

Let’s hear it for Wing Nuts everywhere. The one election in the US where propeller beanie Repugnants tried to nationalize the election, they managed to lose a congressional seat that hasn’t been Democratic since U.S. Grant. An unprecedented loss.

Keep it up, angry bubbas, shrink that party.

And BTW, Sidney, give us a cite on any voter fraud conviction for ACORN anywhere in America, at any time. And don’t try to weasel by citing allegations of voter registration fraud. Just because a contract worker signs up Mickey Mouse or you, Sidney, doesn’t mean MM VOTED. I’ll leave the light on , Sidney.

By: sid

sid — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:07:39 +0000

Where, RBB, did Fund state he made this story up? You can offer an opinion regarding his credibility, but you cannot make a statement of fact without backing it up. Also, in order to refute his allegations, you need to…well…refute his allegations. Are you so far left that you actually believe there are no legitimate scandals involving Acorn? What, precisely, do you refute from the article, and what is your evidence to support such a position? Or do you feel all you need to do is post some hack liberal talking point you’ve been fed, and everyone will just believe you?

By: Red Bank Bar

Red Bank Bar — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:22:05 +0000

Sorry, Larry, wrong again. John Fund is simply NOT credible in the least. He just made it up and has admitted it. The story line comes from a column he wrote in 1993 alleging misconduct in Philadelphia.

The WSJ news division used to be credible. John Fund has never been anything other than a rightwing hack.

By: larry

larry — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:28:03 +0000

RBB-

Read the link posted by Sid. It is from the Wall Street Journal–right-leaning but at least validates my point.

By: Make it up as you go.

Make it up as you go. — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:33:08 +0000

I think its pretty cool how <> Americans who disagree with The Agenda are always called “fevered”. I may change my interwebs arguin’ name to “fevered teabagger”.

By: sid

sid — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:33:49 +0000

Typical, RBB. Ignore the news, and focus on repeating pointless attacks. Then again, virtually all of your posts are pointless, so at least you are consistent.

By: RedBank Bar

RedBank Bar — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:31:34 +0000

I repeat, fact-free posting from larry. Repugnants can’t win elections fairly so they must suppress voting and/or cry about stealing elections (as they did in Florida-2000).