The Spurrier Math
After four years of mediocrity – and three consecutive end-of-season collapses – the expectations were understandably much lower for University of South Carolina head coach Steve Spurrier heading into the 2009 season, his fifth in Columbia.
The “Old Ball Coach” has a young team, a new starting quarterback and one of the toughest schedules in the nation.
Just managing a winning record in such a scenario would be acceptable, wouldn’t it?
Apparently so … to some.
According to a FITS poll conducted at the beginning of the season, a majority of our readers (56%) believe that Spurrier needs only to win one of USC’s remaining three games to hang onto his job – assuming he still wants it. And in case you haven’t visited our comments section, FITS readers aren’t exactly shrinking violets, people.
They’re a tough crowd.
But are they being soft on Spurrier?
After a disastrous Halloween loss to Tennessee, Spurrier’s record at USC now stands at 34-25 – including an 18-20 SEC mark. Over that stretch, he has won zero SEC championships and zero Eastern Division titles.
By contrast, in his first five years at Florida Spurrier’s record was 49-12-1 – and his teams had either won or shared four SEC East titles.
Plus, the best was yet to come (back then, at least) … as the Gators went an astonishing 24-2 during Spurrier’s sixth and seventh seasons in Gainesville, winning a national championship in 1996.
Does anyone really believe something similar is on the Gamecocks’ horizon?
With three games remaining on USC’s 2009 schedule, Spurrier’s future is – or at least should be – very much in doubt.
After galloping off to another hot start, South Carolina is perched on the precipice of another late season collapse – with a tough SEC road game against Arkansas, No. 1 Florida and arch-rival Clemson remaining on its 2009 schedule. If things remain as they are, Carolina is likely to be the underdog in each of those contests.
Over the last four seasons, USC has played well in its first seven games – posting a 21-7 mark and climbing as high as No. 6 in the nation back in 2007.
But the wheels always seem to fall off.
Since 2006, Spurrier’s Gamecocks are an atrocious 6-13 in their final five games of the season – including a horrific 0-5 finish two years ago and an 0-3 collapse last season that saw them outscored 118-30 in their final three games.
After seeing South Carolina’s offensive performance plummet over the past three seasons, Spurrier made wholesale changes on his staff prior to last season’s Outback Bowl loss against Iowa.
Has it paid off?
Not really. Including Saturday’s loss to Tennessee, South Carolina ranks 71st out of 120 Division I-A teams in total offense, and 95th in scoring offense.
The Gamecocks have thrown the ball well (ranking 41st in passing offense), but continue to struggle running the football (ranking 87th in rushing offense).
Spurrier’s defenders point to the evolution of quarterback Stephen Garcia and USC’s stockpile of young talent on both sides of the football. His detractors say that the game has passed him by and that USC should already be competing at an SEC championship level.
So … what’s your take?
What does Spurrier have to do over the next three – possibly four – games to save his job? Or is his job even in jeopardy?
Vote in our poll below …







Comments
By Jon on November 1st, 2009 at 11:46 am
Don’t over think it.
It is the Chicken Curse.
By Groundball on November 1st, 2009 at 11:49 am
Nothing like a bunch of political geeks commenting on sports. I’m sure that Lindsay Graham, Henry McMaster, and Andre Bauer will somehow be blamed for last night’s loss that included a loss of individual liberty.
It was Sanford’s fault though.
By Jim Hennigan on November 1st, 2009 at 12:28 pm
You assume that it’s about winning games or even winning titles.
It’s about putting fannies in seats and keeping people excited. Spurrier does that…alas, because of the winning that he did in Florida. As long as the AD and President are confident that the seats will be filled next season, the job is his.
What I need to know to answer the poll is what has attendance been like?
By justsaynotojoe on November 1st, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Once again the Chickens choke when I have a house full of Clemson and Vol fans and not enough 00 buck to go around.
By USC Fanbase on November 1st, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Beat KKKlimpson & all is forgiven.
By CNSYD on November 1st, 2009 at 11:34 pm
USC Fanbase, beat Clemson and all is forgiven? What could beating Clemson possibly mean? All we hear is how they don’t have the talent USC has, their coach is an ex salesman and USC’s coach has won a national championship, USC has the better school, Clemson is nothing but farmers, Clemson cheats, USC is as pure as the driven snow, USC has the better fanbase, etc. So why is your goal to beat such a low rated school as Clemson?
By Calhoun Fawls on November 2nd, 2009 at 5:41 am
If we fire Spurrier, no one will want the job. Tis the danger of hiring a legend.
By Old Bike Dude on November 2nd, 2009 at 8:12 am
Get ready for Joe Paterno. Or maybe Bobby Bowden.
By Jeffy on November 2nd, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Who would we get if Spurrier gets fired. Dan Devine? Knute Rockne? 6-6. Nothing we can do
about it.
By Toyota Kawaski on November 2nd, 2009 at 3:50 pm
Fits you will go up in flames before SOS does. Oh never mind you already are flaming!!!!!
By OhNoNotAgain on November 2nd, 2009 at 10:58 pm
The Clemson fan turns the argument around that is used so often with them.
The simple fact is, Clemson football coaches these days live and die by the result of the Carolina-Clemson game.
Bowden got 10 years out of being able to beat USC but never ever get another division title or league championship. They are the ones who say USC is such an inferior school, yet Dabo Swinney was rewarded for beating USC once again.
Don’t know what it is about you guys, but you know how to beat us. Every time you’ve beaten us in the past 20 years, you haven’t always been the better team. But you certainly play that one game better than all.
If Clemson in the past 20 had played all its games the way it plays the Carolina game, it would have another national championship, and this one wouldn’t be tainted by recruiting violations that, if the nCAA hadn’t chickend out, would have been a death penalty for Death Valley.
By flipnut on November 3rd, 2009 at 1:26 am
A short message from Clemson fans everywhere, WE LOVE SPURRIER !!!
By CNSYD on November 3rd, 2009 at 10:01 am
OhNoNotAgain, In the same 10 years of the Bowden era, how many division and/or league titles did USC win? It can’t be zero with the Hall of Fame coaches that they had, can it?
By fromupstate on November 3rd, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Here’s the bottom line folks…. It aint about Steven Spurrier or Lou Holtz. It’s about the conference you joined. S. Carolina is trying to climb Mt. Everest with a 10 speed bicycle…..
Here’s the deal….. S. Carolina has 3 “hump” games every year. Those are Georgia, Tennessee and Florida. S. Carolina has to be able to win 2 out of 3 in those matchups and make it the rest of the way with only one other conference loss. That’s an incredibly difficult task that any Tiger fan will admit. As far as the money….. joining the SEC was the best thing that ever happened to USC football….as far as success???? It sealed the deal on mediocrity for 20 years. See below.
S. Carolina vs. ___________ (since 2002)
University of Florida – 1 win 6 losses =16%
University of Georgia- 1 win 7 loses = 14%
University of Tennessee- 2 wins! 6 losses = 33%
combined winning percentage = (4/19) = 21%
Worth Noting…. The Gamecocks actually have a better combined winning percentage against these teams than they do against that other little school in the state of South Carolina.
Clemson University – 1 win 6 losses =16%
Success by association does NOT Exist in college sports, so stop waiving the SEC flag like it’s a crown because it has been a curse (other than the money). I know that a Gamecock would never admit it…. but you should have never left the ACC.
You have a good football team, but you are not LSU, UGA, UT, UF, or Alabama and you know what else…… neither is Clemson. The difference is that Clemson doesn’t have to play those guys year in year out.
Oh by the way…..in response to (OhNoNotAgain)… if the NCAA handed out the Death Penalty for Clemson’s violations from 1978-1980, Alabama and Georgia (among others) would not have football programs either. Get your facts straight. I would kindly ask that any rebuttals to this post include a few verifiable facts sprinkled in there with the commentary just as I have done.