Gamecock Football Attendance Plummets

By fitsnews • on November 1, 2009
Comment Print

williams brice empty seats

Empty seats … it’s “the Garnet Way.”

The 2009 season is poised to set a new low in attendance for the University of South Carolina football program during the Steve Spurrier era – indeed, in more than a decade of Gamecock football.  And that’s even if huge crowds attend USC’s final two home games against No. 1 Florida and arch-rival Clemson, which is no guarantee.

Through the first five home games of the 2009 season, USC is averaging only 73,542 fans per game – compared to an average of 80,529 per game a year ago.  That means South Carolina would need to draw at least 82,000 fans for the Florida and Clemson games to avoid setting a new home attendance low for the Spurrier era.

Two years ago, 82,410 attended Clemson’s 23-21 win over South Carolina, while 81,215 attended Florida’s 51-31 victory over the Gamecocks.  Meeting those attendance numbers could prove difficult this year, though.

For the first time since 2001, South Carolina failed to sell out Williams-Brice Stadium this year – which University officials blame on a struggling economy and a new SEC TV package that put more games on television.

Here at FITS, we blame the consistently mediocre product that the University puts on the football field – and the addition of a new seat license fee to USC’s already exorbitant ticket prices.

In 2004 – former head coach Lou Holtz’s final year at USC – South Carolina drew 482,200 fans to six home games, or 80,366 fans per game.  It was the fifth consecutive year that USC averaged over 80,000 fans a game – a feat it has accomplished just once (2008) under Spurrier.

The Holtz era also saw the top five crowds in Williams-Brice Stadium history, 85,000 (Clemson, 2001), 84,900 (Florida, 2001), 84,277 (Georgia 2002), 84,200 (Tennessee, 2000) and 83,987 (Clemson, 2003).

Since then, the fan support has gone downhill.

Here’s a look at the last decade of Gamecock football attendance …

Year (Record) – # Home Games – Head Coach – Total Attendance (Per Game) – Attendance Ranking

2009 (6-3) – 7 – Steve Spurrier – 367,709 (73,542) #??
2008 (7-6) – 7 – Steve Spurrier – 563,703 (80,529) – #17
2007 (6-6) – 7 – Steve Spurrier – 549,269 (78,467) #19
2006 (8-5) – 7 – Steve Spurrier – 529,412 (75,630) #19
2005 (7-5) – 7 – Steve Spurrier – 559,071 (79,867) #16
2004 (6-5) – 6 – Lou Holtz – 482,200 (80,366) NA
2003 (5-7) – 8 – Lou Holtz – 646,754 (80,844) #13
2002 (5-7) – 6 – Lou Holtz – 492,828 (82,138) #10
2001 (9-3) – 7 – Lou Holtz – 578,295 (82,614) #11
2000 (8-4) – 6 – Lou Holtz – 491,425 (81,904) #11
1999 (0-11) – 6 – Lou Holtz – 469,635 (78,273) #14
1998 (1-10) – 6 – Brad Scott – 448,463 (74,744) #15

When Spurrier arrived on campus five years ago, USC’s athletics department had big dreams – both on the football field and with respect to the facilities surrounding it.

USC officials were looking to add an upper deck to the north end zone, which would have boosted Williams-Brice Stadium’s capacity by another 13,500 seats.  That would have raised the stadium’s capacity to 96,000, and made it possible to squeeze as many as 100,000 inside for big games.

That goal now seems like a pipe dream, particularly after only 68,278 fans showed up for an SEC match-up against Kentucky earlier this season.  That was the smallest crowd to watch a USC game in over a decade.

Also remember that these are “announced” crowds, not necessarily the number of “butts in seats.”

Of course the lack of demand for a stadium expansion hasn’t stopped USC from pouring millions into Williams-Brice.

USC spent $4 million prior to this season to upgrade the locker room and “recruiting area” beneath the West stands, which includes the addition of a giant Gamecock that players rub for luck before taking the field.  Prior to the 2008 season, the stadium’s training room also received a multimillion-dollar makeover.

fitsfinger

Comments

By weighing in on November 1st, 2009 at 5:23 pm

While one could agree the product is part of the reason, there are several other factors:

-All Games on TV (even FAU an SC State)
-Seat Licenses
-Down Economy
-Disposable Income is way way down

You did touch on these, but I think it’s truly a combination of them all. Florida, UGA, and UT are all experiencing the same problems, and they’ve had their licenses in place for years. Their drop off is not as great, but they have had an chance to allow fans to become used to the ticket costs.

In 3 years the stadium will be full again, and with the ESPN/SEC deal, they are still gonna make more money.

By HE-MAN on November 1st, 2009 at 7:19 pm

The reason attendance is down is because of the economy of course and the fact that its not about football anymore its about how much USC can make in a fiscal year. This is college football not the pros. Its all about whos owns the best parking place, the biggest condo, the box seats at the game. The need to rename downtown columbia USC Town they own just about everything there as it is.

By countryboy on November 1st, 2009 at 8:17 pm

TV income must be way, way up, since it looks as if all the games will be on TV this season.

By flipnut on November 1st, 2009 at 11:34 pm

USC has ended yet another coaches career. The next coach would be well advised to stay anonymous like the Stig on Top Gear.

By Calhoun Fawls on November 2nd, 2009 at 5:40 am

Longtime fans like myself were told thank you for your loyalty, now prove it again by giving us your first born child to hold onto to your tickets and parking space from last year.

By Andrew on November 2nd, 2009 at 9:23 am

Yet these are still the best 4.5 years of USC football, based on wins, in program history.

So, it’s a combination of poor economy, unfriendly customer service, and fan apathy in the best years of USC football history.

By justsayin' on November 2nd, 2009 at 9:59 am

The economy and product are not the answer…. Over the last 30 years that I have attended games, we have had economic downturns, we have had 0-11 seasons, we have been on TV for every major game… what has destroyed the attendance numbers and the Gamecock Club is the Garnet Way and those behind it. They are creating excuses to spend money (Revenue Increases on annual basis over a year ago….seat license produced less than 5 million – net of 4 million in expenses, ESPN is producing an additional 6-8 million,,, that’s 11-13 million more on an annual basis)… a new coaches support building (housing the AD and his staff), the hallway that replicates the entrance to 2001 (build for recruiting before someone read the rule book and realized they could not use it), a “recruiting room” that has sofas and video games for recruits at the stadium, etc. etc. and – of course Todd’s contract! Loyalty… forget it. What’s in your bank account?

By utah on November 2nd, 2009 at 10:47 am

The hallway simulating 2001 is not a recruiting violation. The only violation occurred when a staff member blew smoke at the end of it while recruits were walking through.

Also, I believe we are ranked nationally in approximately the same place this year as last year, with likely the two biggest games for attendance coming up. So while there may be empty seats, when you compare what’s happened elsewhere, it’s not a big deal. When you add in the fact that the athletic dept. initiated the seat fees and you realize we remained in basically the same spot, it’s a total non-issue.

By Willy Mac on November 2nd, 2009 at 11:53 am

You sure about that Clemson 2003 attendance figure? You wouldn’t know it if you’d been there…

By Darkseid616 on November 2nd, 2009 at 2:06 pm

As a USC grad (like my dad,grand dad and great grand dad) I try to attend several USC games a year. This year I’ve stayed home; not because of ticket prices or parking issues, but because of one thing $$$$. With the price of gas going up and the economy tanking faster Obama’s poll numbers I’ve decided like many USC fans I know to stay home. But it’s not just for Carolina games, I live in Florence and for me and my son we use to get away to Columbia,Myrtle Beach,Atlanta for a long weekend.Not this year (and as long as that jack***) Obama is in office we may stay home and sit on our money.But things will turn around and when they do I’ll be back for a long weekend in Columbia and at Carolina. As for the loss to Tennessee,remember great teams are not made over night or even in a year or two. Florida,Miami,FSU have had struggles in the past. Even the much storied programs like Michigan and Notre Dame have had less than medicore years,true fans support their team not because of a single program but out of love of the University. That’s why our blood is Garnet and Black and we are one nation–the Gamecock Nation. GO COCKS!!!

By justsayin' on November 2nd, 2009 at 2:13 pm

Utah – you work for the athletic department? Glad you’re not in charge of my checkbook. Couple hundred thousand for a 15 foot hallway – that was done for recruiting, with built-in equipment to bloow smoke, and Spurrier voice-over – what’s it matter… it is not your money.
Total non-issue when they head back to Chapel Hill.

By really???? on November 2nd, 2009 at 2:26 pm

Every game I have been to at Clemson has been the same this year. Although it has rained every home game this year. People were trying to get tickets for the home opener but no one was scalping and there were a ton of empty seats inside the stadium.

By CNSYD on November 2nd, 2009 at 3:54 pm

The true measure is the number of season tickets sold. That is what to compare the present year against. Walk ups and single game purchases are nice but that is not what the budget is built upon.

By Toyota Kawaski on November 2nd, 2009 at 4:00 pm

Same thing all over the country.Whole upper deck was empty in Knoxville Saturday.Even where i sat down low there were empties

By utah on November 2nd, 2009 at 5:27 pm

justsayin’:

No, I don’t work for the athletic department. I’m just more informed than you.

By PalmettoCPA on November 2nd, 2009 at 10:07 pm

Guess you didn’t see the huge sections of empty seats in Knoxville. This is not a problem local to USC.

As far as the YES program goes; What USC did was just take the profit out of scalping, so many of the “great fans” who eBayed a couple pairs of tickets to subsidize their own were unable to continue to do so. They also tiered the pricing of the seat licenses by location, which was long overdue. You can’t tell me that all the seats in W-B deserve the same pricing. You pay a premium for premium seats, otherwise you sit in the nosebleeds and pay face value. Simple as that.

By SnakeMD on November 8th, 2009 at 2:22 am

It is happening all over. I just got back from Jacksonville, Florida and the Jaguars stadium attendance was pathetic. They have giant tarps stretched over the end zones to force people to sit together so when the cameras pan the seats it appears to be a full crowd. There seems to be a dark mood across the land. It is about money, don’t kid yourself. Bigger is not always better.

By El Jefe` on November 19th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

I find it funny that the writer leaves out this years attendance ranking. It’s readily available on the NCAA website. USC is currently 18th in the nation, higher than Clemson, and has a higher percent of capacity than Clemson.

Leave a Comment