Comments on: More “Sic” Exposure Coming …

By: bummer

bummer — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:49:14 +0000

Well, they didn’t post my comments on their site. Atleast Sic Willie let’s everyone’s voice be heard on his site.

By: I got the money

I got the money — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:55:25 +0000

All that $80k is in my pockets. I have been ‘fronting’ as Sic and taken the money and running. Thanks!

By: Ynot

Ynot — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:05:36 +0000

Keep on keepin on Sic.
Step on more toes.
Want some help??

By: reprobate

reprobate — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:43:51 +0000

Sounds to me like it’s STFU. Shut the Folks up. They cain’t do it.

By: BIN News Editorial Staff

BIN News Editorial Staff — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:29:24 +0000

Could it be? The Boys From Charlotte? BIN News “broke” the story that the “Boys From Charlotte” were keeping up with sic(k) willie over a year ago.

Actually, it was our Funding Editor who “broke wind” after reading one of sic(k) willie’s moronic posts. It smelted like sic(k) willie.

Actually, “The Boys From Charlotte” came to our Funding Editor in a dream after a Metamucil overdose.

She loves her evening cocktail. Three ounces of Metamucil and a triple shot of Jack, Crown, or anything brown.

By: Skidmarks

Skidmarks — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:16:43 +0000

Oh, there is what’s called right-of-reply that pretty much negates any defamation suits.
Keep replying, FITS.
I think you’re in dreamland as far as taking the GOP back to its Goldwater-Rockefellow past.
But I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to speak as a socially liberal, fiscally conservative Democrat.

By: Todd

Todd — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:00:25 +0000

Win or lose, be sure to appeal the court decision, Sic. I want to be there when Jean Toal has to face you in her Star Chamber.

By: Punky

Punky — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:33:36 +0000

Will,

The new site is not aimed at you, but at someone that will be mentioned in an “off handed way”.

You are not be the target, just convenient. At least, that is what I hear. The “boy in DC” plays all sides of the fence. Friend one day, foe the next.

The Punkster

By: Jonny D

Jonny D — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:28:51 +0000

Fits, it’s true, you have indeed been careful in trying not to cross the line against yourself. But I do think you have the elements of a prima facie case of defamation, which would be a case on its face in the absence of a defense. And you most likely could even withstand a summary judgement motion, as I doubt that it could be successfully argued that there are no material facts in question, and that you are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. I know that you and your lawyers could make the case that you have been a victim of defamation, which is defined as a defamatory statement concerning you, published by a third party which understands the statement’s defamatory nature, which has resulted in damage to your reputation. In summary, you have been the recipient of more than enough “dirt” to file the “John Doe” lawsuit, and to get those subpoenas out to the web hosts and get this individual’s identity. But I hate to be a party pooper. I really don’t want to see you “out” yourself. I would much rather you put your energy into making “What the Folks?” and “Who the Folks?” the best possible sites that they can be.

By: fitsnews

fitsnews — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:57:08 +0000

JD-

Yeah, we’ve collected all this information on ourselves in order to discredit ourselves.

The site(s) has thusfar been very careful not to cross the line against Sic, of course crossing the line against a public figure is very difficult to do.

-FITS